Abstract
Background: Giant vesical calculus is rare nowadays. The purpose of this case report is to highlight the difficulty in its detection and consequence of misdiagnosis in an adolescent female.
Case: A 14-year-old female presented with progressively increasing lower abdominal lump, and was misdiagnosed sonographically as having teratoma. The mystery was unraveled by CECT and MRI and treated by cystolithotomy. Summary and
Conclusion: Careful sonographic examination needs to be done due to small uterus and ovaries in an adolescent female when presenting with calcified pelvic lesion, to avoid any undue surgical procedure.
References
1. Becher RM, Tolia BM, Newman HR. Giant vesical calculus. JAMA 1976; 239: 2272-3.
2. Besiland C, Anderson M. Giant urinary bladder stone. Tideskr Nor Laegeloren. 2000; 120: 573-4.
3. Schwartz BF, Stoller MZ. The vesical calculus. Urol Clin North Am 2000; 27: 333-46.
4. Pomerantz PA. Giant vesical calculus formed around arterial graft incorporated into bladder. Urology 1989; 33: 57-8.
5. Athanasopoulos A, Perimenis P, Giannitsas K, et al. The relationship between the perineal length measurements and urodyanamic stress incontinenece. Int Urol Nephrol. 2005; 37 (4):701-5.
6. Kalis V, Chaloupka P, Turek J, et al. The perineal body length and injury at delivery. Ceska Gynekol 2005; 70(5):355-61.
7. Harrison JH, et al. Campbell's Urology. 4th ed., Philadelphia WB Saunders Co. 1978; 853-4.
8. Staskin et al;khan and Wilkinson ;mahazan;chow et al,Maskey et al. Schwartz and Stoller, Demirci et al Campbell”s Urology 10th ed.
Corresponding Author
Dr Shivi Jain
G-11, Lal Bahadur Shastri Nagar Colony, Karaundi, Varanasi-221005
Email: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.; Mobile number: 91-9450964146
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18535/jmscr/v3i9.56
