MRCP Vs ERCP in Evaluation of Obstructive Jaundice

Title: MRCP Vs ERCP in Evaluation of Obstructive Jaundice

Authors: Dr Anil Kumar, Dr Veena, Dr Shivani Gogi, Dr Surender Alwala, Dr Hanumath Prasad, Dr Shanthi Sree

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18535/jmscr/v4i10.10

Abstract

References

Corresponding Author

Abstract

Background & Objective: Patients with obstructive jaundice constitute significant proportion of patients presenting with jaundice at our hospital. In present study it is proposed to investigate primarily the diagnostic accuracy of MRCP and ERCP in defining etiology, level of obstruction in obstructive jaundice.

Methods: A prospective study conducted on 25 adult patients excluding paediatric population. A total of 17 male, 8 female subjects were evaluated in mean age group of 22 to 79 years. MRCP followed by ERCP was done in all patients.

Results: The study group was defined into 3 groups: Stone – group I, Neoplastic – Group II, Non- neoplastic- Group-III. MRCP and ERCP had a success rate of 100% & 83% respectively to identify calculi in group-I, 100% & 73% respectively to identify neoplastic disease process in group-II 100%& 75% respectively for identifying non–neoplastic cause in group-III.

Conclusion: Diagnostic accuracy of MRCP and ERCP are comparable while MRCP scores over ERCP in failed ERCP cases..MRCP has 100% sensitivty and 100% specificity in stone disease and can be used as noninvasive alternative to ERCP. ERCP has more therapeutic value compared to MRCP.

Keywords: Endoscopic retrogradecholangiopancreatography (ERCP), Magnetic resonance cholangiopan-creatography (MRCP),calculi, stricture, obstructive jaundice.

References

1. WallNER bk Schumacher KA, Weidenmaier W, et al. Dilated biliary tract: evaluation with MR cholangiog-raphy with a T2 weighted contrast enhan-ced fast sequence. Radiology 1991; 181 : 805 – 808.

2. Lee MG, Jeong YK, Kim MW, et al. MR cholangiopancreatography of the pancreto-biliary diseases: Comparison of single shot RARE and multi slice Haste sequences. AM J Roentgenol. 1998 ; 171: 1539-1545.

3. L. Khandelwal N. Suri S, Kataria S. et al. Ultrasound in obstructive jaundice Indian J. Gastroente-rology , 1990 ; 9: 51-53.

4. Staki K, Cho K, Tatsumi S, et al. Evaluation of cholangiographic procedures in diagnosis of obstructive jaundice. Am. Surg. 1981 ; 47 : 387-392.

5. Hall Craggs M, Allen C, Owens C, et al. MR cholangiography : Clinical evaluation in 40 cases. Radiology. 1993; 189:423-427.

6. Soto A. Barish AM. Yucel EK, et al. MR cholangiography comparison with ERCP. Gastroenterology. 1996 ; 110:589-597.

7. Ta Sen Yeh, Yi-Yin Jan, Jeng Hwer Tseng et al Malignant perihilar biliary obstruction Magnetic Resonance cholangiographic findings. Am J of Gastroenterology 2000; 95 ( 2): 432.

8. Alcaraz MJ, De la Morenene EJ, Polo A et al. A comparative study of magnetic resonance cholangiography and direct cholangiography Rev Exp Enferm Dig 2000 July; 92 (7) 423-42.

9. Cappeliez O, Delhaye M, Deviere J, et al. Chronic pancreatitis ; evaluation of pancreatic exocrine function with MR pancreatography after secretin stimulation. Radiology 2000 ; 215 : 358-64.

10. Fulcher AS, Capps GW, Turner MA. Thoracopancre-atic fistula ; clinical and imaging findings. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1999; 23 : 181-7.

11. Fulcher AS, Turner MA. HASTE MR cholangiography in the evaluation of hilar cholangiocarcinoma. AJR 1997; 169: 1501-5.

12. Fulcher As, Turner MA, Capps GW, Zfass AM, Baker KM. Half-Fourier RARE MR cholangiopancreatography in 300 subjects Radiology 1998 ; 207 : 21-32.

13. Fulcher AS, Turner MA, Franklin KJ, et al. Evaluation of primary sclerosing cholangitis with magnetic resonance cholangiography : a case control study. Radiology 2000 ; 215 : 71-80.

14. Heverhagen JT, Muller D, Battmann A, et al. MR hydrometry to assess exocrine function of the pancreas ; initial results of noninvasive quantification of secretion. Radiology 2001 ; 218 : 61-7.

15. Lopera JE, Soto JA, Munera F. Malignant hilar and perihilar biliary obstruction : use of MR cholangiography to define the extent of biliary ductal involvement and plan percutaneous interventions. Radiology 2001 ; 220 : 90-6.

16. Manfredi R, Costamagna G, Brizi MG, et al. Severe chronic pancretitis versus sus-pectted pancreatic disease; dynamic MR cholangiopancreatography after secretin stimulation. Radiology 2000; 214: 849-55.

17. Reinhold C, Taourel P, Bret P, et al. Choledocholithiasis; evaluation of MR cholangiography for diagnosis. Radiology 1998 ; 209 : 435-42.

18. Sica GT, Braver J, Cooney MJ, et al. Comparison of endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiography with MR cholangiopa-ncreatography in patients with pancreatitis. Radiology. 1999 ; 210 : 605-10.

19. Soto JA, Barish MA, Alvarez O, et al. Detection of choledocholithiasis with MR cholangiography; comparison of three-dimensional fast spin-echo and single –and multisection half-Fourier rapid acquisition with relaxation enhancement sequences. Radiology. 2000 ; 215 : 737-45.

20. Masci E, Toti G, Mariani A, et al. Complications of diagnostic and therape-utic ERCP; a prospective multi-centre study. Am J Gastroentrol 2001;96: 417-23.

21. Laing FC. The gall bladder and bile ducts. In : Rumack CM, Wilson SR, Charboneau JW, editors. Diagnostic ultrasound. 2^nd edition. St. Louis : Mosby-Year Book ; 1998.p. 175-223.

22. Mitchell SE, Clark RA. A comparison of computed tomography and sonography in choledocholithiasis. AJR 1984 ; 142 : 729-33.

23. Cohen SA, Siegel JH, Kasmin FE. Complications of diagnostic and therapeutic ERCP. Abdom Imaging 1996 ; 21 : 385-94.

24. Cotton PB, Chong WK. Complications of endoscopic retrograde cholangiography and theraphy. In : Silvis SE. Rohrmann CA, Ansel HY, editors. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. New York : Igaku-Shoin ; 1995. p. 446-50.

25. Sherman S, Lehman GA. ERCP – and endoscopic sphincterotomy induced pancreatitis. Pancreas 1991 ; 6 : 350-67.

26. Frey CF, Burbige EJ, Meinke WB, et al. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancre-atography. AM J Surg 1982 ; 144 : 109-14.

27. MacCarty RL, LaRusso. NF, Wiesner RH, et al. Primary sclerosing cholangitis; findings on cholangiography and pancr-eatography. Radiology. 1983 ; 149 : 39-44.

28. Takehara Y, Ichijo K, Tooyama N, et al. Breath-hold MR cholangiopancreato-graphy with a long-echo-train fast spin-echo sequence and a surface coil in chroni-c pancreatitis. Radiology. 1994; 192: 73-8.

Abstract

References

Corresponding Author

Call For Paper Volume 12 Issue 12 December 2024

JMSCR Menu

Impact Factor SJIF 2024: 7.892

Crossref - DOI

Editorial Policy

Frequency of Publication

Submission of Articles

Search