Abstract
Purpose: To compare the merits and demerits of stapled skin closure when compared to conventional sutures skin closure in elective general surgical cases.
Material and Methods: Total of 100 patients (50 in stapler and 50 in suture group) were selected. They underwent closure of skin incision after general surgical procedures (Like open cholecystectomy, appendectomy, modified radical mastectomy, inguinal hernia repair). According to their assigned growth with either nylon (in suture group) or stainless skin staples (in stapler group). Both the groups were compared and analysed for speed of closure, pain on removal, patient comfort, wound related complications and aesthetic outcome i.e. resulting scar.
Results: The mean incision length in suture group was 7.2±1.2 cm while in stapler group was 7.4±1.1 cm which was statistically insignificant. The mean time of closure was 48 seconds in suture group while in stapler group was 295 seconds which was statistically highly significant (p<0.001).
Conclusion: It was concluded that skin staples are better alternative to conventional sutures in general surgical procedure as they lead to faster wound closure with better aesthetic outcome and patient comfort with low wound complication rates.
References
- Earley M.: Wounds, tissue repair and Scar: Williams NC, Bulstrode CJK, O’Connell PR.(Eds.) Bailey & Love Short Practice of Surgery.26th Boca Raton: CRC Press 2013; p.24-5.
- Cotran R, Kumar, V, Collins T. Robbins pathological basis of disease.9th Philadelphia, W.B. Sauders 2014; p114-126.
- Leong M, Phillips LG.: Wound healing: Townsend Jr CM, Beauchamp RD, Evers BM, Mattox KL(Eds.) Sabiston text book of surgery.19th Philadelphia: WB Saunders 2012; p.167-8.
- Barbul A, Efron DT, Kavalukas SL.: Wound healing: Brunicardi FC, Andrson DK, Dunn DL, Hunter JG, Matthew JB, Pollock RE(Eds.) Schwartz principles of surgery 10th New York: McGraw Hill 2010; p.241-44.
- Halsted WS.: Ligature and suture material the employment of fine silk in preference to catgut and the advantages of transfixion of tissues and vessels in control of hemorrhage also an account of the introduction of gloves, gutta-percha tissue and silver foil. JAMA1913;60(15): p.1119-26.
- Mackeen AD, Schuster M, Berghella V. Suture versus staplers for skin closure after caesarean: A metaanalysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2015;212(5):621/e-10.
- Slade Shantz JA, Vernon J, Morshed S, Leiter J, Stranges G. Sutures versus staples for wound closure in orthopaedic surgery: a pilot randomized controlled trial. Patient Saf Surg. 2013;7(1):6.
- Smith TO, Sextan D, Mann C, Donell S. Sutures versus staples for skin closure in orthopaedic surgery. metaanalysis. BMJ 2010;340:c1199.
- Oswal S, Borle R, Bhola N, Jadhav A, Surana S, Oswal R. Surgical staples: A superior alternative to sutures for skin closure after neck dissection- A Single Blinded Prospective Randomized Clinical Study. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2017;75(12):2707e1-e6.
- Merritt K, Hitchins VM, Neale AR. Tissue colonization from implantable biomaterials with low numbers of bacteria. J Biomed Mater Res. 1999;44(3):261-65.
- Eldrup J, Wied U, Anderson B. Randomised trial comparing Proximate stapler with conventional skin closure. Acta Chir Scand 1981;147(7):501-2.
- Lavazzo C, Gkegkes ID, Vouloumanou EK, Mamais I, Peppa G, Falagas ME. Sutures versus staplers for management of surgical wounds: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Am Surg. 2011;77(9):1206-21.
- Khan AA, Majeed S, Shahzadi M, Hussain SM, Ali MZ, Siddique K. Polyprophylene suture versus skin staples for securing mesh in Lichtenstein inguinal hernioplasty. J Coll Physic & Surg Pak. 2014;24(2):88-90.
- Rousseau JA, Girard K, Turcot-Lemay L, Thomas N. A randomized study comparing skin closure in caesarean sections: Staples vs subsubcuticular sutures. Am J Obsetet Gynecol. 2009;200(3):265e1-4.
- O'Neill JK, Robinson P, Giddins GE. Staplers for intaroperative skin retraction in hand surgery. Journal of Hand and Microsurgery. 2014;6(2):100-101.
Corresponding Author
Chauhan A
Associate Professor, Department of Surgery,
Gajra Raja Medical College, Gwalior (M.P.) India – 474001
DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.18535/jmscr/v6i6.54
