Abstract
Introduction: The role of Multidetector Computerized Tomography (MDCT) in gastric carcinoma evaluation and management is a matter of debate. Early and accurate detection, staging and management significantly improve the prognosis.
Aim of the Study: To evaluate the efficacy of MDCT in comparison with the surgical and histopathological findings in gastric carcinoma.
Materials and Methods: 50 patients with diagnosed gastric adenocarcinoma were evaluated with MDCT. Staging was done and correlated with surgical and histopathological findings which were the gold standard. Various statistical calculations and significance are assessed.
Results: The sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values and accuracy of MDCT were calculated with regards to T staging, N staging, regional infiltration and metastases.
Conclusions: There was statistically significant correlation between MDCT and histopathological findings in T staging and N staging. Sensitivity was more in advanced carcinoma. The limitations in T staging were in differentiating T3 and T4 and in assessing regional infiltration. This was most probably due to the reduced intraabdominal fat in thin, cachexic patients. The incidence of micro metastases in normal sized lymph nodes and reactive enlargement of lymph nodes were the limitations in N staging. MDCT can reliably rule out metastases. Overall, MDCT is a highly reliable tool in accurate staging of gastric carcinoma, which helps in accurate management and improves prognosis.
Keywords: multidetector computerized tomography, gastric carcinoma.
References
1. Jemal A, Bray F, Center MM, Ferlay J, Ward E, Forman D. Global cancer statistics. CACancer J Clin 2011; 61: 69_90. doi: 10.3322/ caac.20107. PMid: 21296855.
2. Davies J, Chalmers AG, Sue-Ling HM, et al. Spiral computed tomography and operative staging of gastric carcinoma: a comparison with histopathological staging. Gut. 1997; 41:314–9.
3. Martin RC 2nd, Jaques DP, Brennan MF, Karpeh M. Extended local resection for advanced gastric cancer: increased survival versus increased morbidity. Ann Surg 2002; 236(2):159–165.
4. Yan-Quiroz EF, Díaz-Plasencia JA, Burgos-Chávez OA, et al. Five-year survival prognosis factors in patients with resectable advanced serosa exposed gastric carcinoma. Rev Gastroenterol Peru 2003; 23(3):184–191.
5. Nitti D, Marchet A, Mammano E, et al. Extended lymphadenectomy (D2) in patients with early gastric cancer. Eur J Surg Oncol 2005;31(8):875–881.
6. Carter KJ, Schaffer HA, Ritchie WP Jr. Early gastric cancer. Ann Surg 1984; 199(5):604–609
7. Moss AA, Schnyder P, Marks W, Margulis AR. Gastric adenocarcinoma: a comparison of the accuracy and economics of staging by computed tomography and surgery. Gastroenterology. 1981; 80:45–50.
8. Dehn TCB, Reznek RH, Nockler IB, White FE. The preoperative assessment of advanced gastric cancer by computed tomography. Br J Surg. 1984; 71:412–7.
9. 9. Vallgren S, Hedenbro J, Götberg S, Walther B. Preoperative computed tomography for evaluation of tumor growth patients with gastric cancer . Acta Chir Scand. 1985; 151(6):571–3.
10. Frasier J, Nash R, James DC. Computed tomography in gastric cancer (letter). Br J Surg. 1985; 72:249.
11. Cook AO, Levine BA, Sirinek KR, Gaskill HV. Evaluation of gastric adenocarcinoma: abdominal computed tomography does not replace celiotomy. Arch Surg. 1986; 121: 603–6.
12. AEM Hameed, AH Ghazal Diagnosis of gastric cancer with Multidetector CT: correlation with surgical and histopathologic findings .Bull. Alex Fac med.45 No.3, 2009
13. Zhong BY, Liu YX, Huang WF, Liu QQ, Liu SQ, Liu Y. [Clinical value of 64-slice spiral 3-phase CT enhanced scanning for preoperative TNM staging assessment of gastric carcinoma]. Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2012 Jul; 15(7):706-9.
14. Zompetta C, Catarci M, Polettini E [Diag-nostic accuracy of computerized tomography. Preoperative staging of gastric cancer] Clin Ter. 1995 Dec; 146(12):825-41.
15. Kim JW, Shin SS, Heo SH, Choi YD, Lim HS, Park YK, Park CH, Jeong YY, Kang HK. Diagnostic performance of 64-section CT using CT gastrography in preoperative T staging of gastric cancer according to 7th edition of AJCC cancer staging manual. Eur Radiol 2012; 22: 654-662 [PMID: 21965037 DOI: 10.1007/s00330-011-2283-3]
16. Kwee RM, Kwee TC. Imaging in assessing lymph node status in gastric cancer. Gastric Cancer 2009; 12: 6-22 [PMID: 19390927 DOI: 10.1007/s10120-008-0492-5]
17. Grenacher L, Hansmann J. [Radiological imaging of the upper gastrointestinal tract. Part II. The stomach]. Radiologic. 2007 Jan; 47(1):71-88.
18. Chen CY, Hsu JS, Wu DC, Kang WY, Hsieh JS, Jaw TS, Wu MT, Liu GC. Gastric cancer: preoperative local staging with 3D multi-detector row CT--correlation with surgical and histopathologic results. Radiology 2007; 242: 472-482 [PMID: 17255419 DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2422051557]
19. F. D'Elia, A. Zingarelli, D. Palli, M. Grani Hydro-dynamic CT preoperative staging of gastric cancer: correlation with pathological findings. A prospective study of 107 cases European Radiology November 2000, Volume 10, Issue 12, pp 1877-1885
20. Chamadol N , Wongwiwatchai J, Bhudhisawasd V, Pairojkul C Accuracy of spiral CT in preoperative staging of gastric carcinoma: correlation with surgical and pathological findings J Med Assoc Thai. 2008 Mar; 91(3):356-63.
21. Bang-Bin Chen, Po-Chin Liang, Kao-Lang Liu, Jong-Kai Hsiao, Preoperative Diagnosis of Gastric Tumors by Three-dimensional Multidetector Row CT and Double Contrast Barium Meal Study: Correlation with Surgical and Histologic Results [J Formos Med Assoc 2007;106(11):943–952].
DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.18535/jmscr/v5i4.69
