Title: Comparison of Taylor Approach vs Lumbar Approach of Spinal Anaesthesia in Terms of Difficulty to Perform in Patients Undergoing Transuretheral Resection of Prostate

Authors: Dr Kamini Randhawa, Dr Meenakshi Rana

 DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.18535/jmscr/v9i6.17

Abstract

 

Taylor modified paramedian approach (Taylors approach) which is reliable and less traumatic alternative in difficult spine. The purpose of the present study was to compare taylor approach vs lumbar approach of spinal anaesthesia in terms of difficulty to perform in patients undergoing transuretheral resection of prostate. 30 patients (Group C) received SPA by a L4/5 approach and 30 patients by Taylor’s approach (Group T). Bupivacaine dose did not differ between groups. we observed total number of attempts in each group. The mean number of attempts per successful block in Group C and Group T was 1.13 ± 0.3 and 1.5 ± 0.6 respectively. The p value was 0.003 which was found to be statistically significant. (p value less than 0.005). So, taylors approach of spinal anesthesia is difficult to perform as compared to conventional approach and require expertise.

Editorial Policy

Authors should prepare their manuscripts according to the instructions given in the authors' guidelines. Manuscripts which do not ..

Read More.....

Frequency of Publication

JMSCR is published as monthly journal with 12 issues per year. Special editions are also planned subjected to the scope and need....

Read more...

Submission of Articles

Authors are invited to submit their research articles, review papers, Case Report properly formatted as per the author guidelines.........

Read more...