Abstract
Aim: To identify the various clinical presentations and the complications of upper 1/3rd Ureteric calculus, To study the most common type of stone in upper 1/3rd ureter(stone analysis). To study the difference and relative advantage of different treatment modalities so that an appropriate treatment regimen can be instituted for the patient and further complications may be prevented.
Materials and Methods: Prospective study of 100 patients diagnosed to have upper ureteric calculi at Kempegowda Institute Of Medical Sciences Hospital, Bangalore from October 2014 to August 2016 and of them 74 underwent operative procedure for upper ureteric calculi. Data was analysed using descriptive statistics and chi-square test.
Results: Results were analysed among who underwent operative procedure in different ascepts like, Age (mean age=43.59), Incidence (M>F), dietary habits (mixed diet> veg diet), site of pain (U/L>B/L), complications, need for ESWL(19), different operatives modalities followed by stone analysis.
Conclusion: the incidence of urolithiasis has increased drastically, probably due to modern lifestyle and dietary habits and shift in the age distribution of Urolithiasis in recent times. There is an increased number of patients suffering fromthis condition in younger age group. Shift in gender distribution of urolithiasis with age, especially in females in post-menopausal period.
References
- Romero V, Akpinar H, Assimos DG. Kidney stones: a global picture of prevalence, Incidence, and associated risk factors. Rev Urol 2010; 12:e86–96.
- Boyce CJ, Pickhardt PJ, and Lawrence EM, et al. Prevalence of urolithiasis in asymptomatic adults: objective determination using low dose noncontrast computerized tomography. J Urol 2010; 183:1017 21.
- Edvardsson VO, Indridason OS, Haraldsson G, et al. Temporal trends in the incidence of kidney stone disease. Kidney Int 2013; 83:146–52. Erratum in Kidney Int 2013; 83:972.
- Marshall V, White RH, Chaput de Saintonge M, et al. The natural history of renal and ureteric calculi. Br J Urol 1975; 47:117–24.
- Johnson CM, Wilson DM, O’Fallon WM, et al. Renal stone epidemiology: a 25-year study in Rochester, Minnesota. Kidney Int 1979; 16:624–31.
- McKane WR, Khosla S, Burritt MF, et al. Mechanism of renal calcium conservation with estrogen replacement therapy in women in early postmenopause—a clinical research center study. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 1995; 80:3458–64.
- Nordin BE, Need AG, and Morris HA, et al. Biochemical variables in pre- and postmenopausal women: reconciling the calcium and estrogen hypotheses. OsteoporosInt 1999; 9:351–7.
- Curhan GC, Willett WC, Rimm EB, et al. Body size and risk of kidney stones. J Am SocNephrol 1998; 9:1645–52.
- Taylor EN, Stampfer MJ, Curhan GC. Obesity, weight gain, and the risk ofkidney stones. JAMA 2005b; 293:455–62.
- Siener R, Glatz S, Nicolay C, et al. The role of overweight and obesity in calcium oxalate stone formation. Obes Res 2004; 12:106–13
- Negri AL, Spivacow R, Del Valle E, et al. Clinical and biochemical profile of patients with “pure” uric acid nephrolithiasis compared with “pure” calcium oxalate stone formers. Urol Res 2007; 35:247–51.
Corresponding Author
Dr Priya .S
Senior Resident, Dept of Surgery, Kempegowda Institute of Medical Sciences and Research Centre
K.R Road,VV Puram Bangalore Pin:560004
Email: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it., Phone: 9886601159
DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.18535/jmscr/v5i12.59
