1.      Chen S.S., Greenlee G.M., Kim J.E., Smith C.L., Huang G.J.: Systematic review of self-ligating brackets. Am. J. Orthod. Dentofac. Orthop. 2010, 137, 726.e1–e18. 


2.      Rinchuse D.J., Miles P.G.: Self-ligating brackets: present and future. Am. J. Orthod. Dentofac. Orthop. 2007, 132, 216–222. 


3.      Harradine N.: The history and development of self-ligating brackets. Semin. Orthod. 2008, 14, 5–18.

4.      Berger, J. L. & Byloff, F. K. (2001). The clinical efficiency of self-ligated brackets. Journal of Clinical Orthodontics, Vol. 35, No. 5, pp. 304–308, ISSN 1147-5540.


5.      Damon, D.H. The Damon low-friction bracket: A biologically compatible straight-wire system. (1998). Journal of Clinical Orthodontics, Vol. 32, No. 11, pp. 670-680, ISSN  1038-8398.


6.      Keim, R. G.; Gottlieb, E. L.; Nelson, A. H. & Vogels, D. S. (2008). Study of orthodontic diagnosis and treatment procedures. Part 1: results and trends. Journal of Clinical Orthodontics, Vol. 42, no. 11, pp. 625–640, ISSN 1907-5377.

7.      keim, R. G.; Gottlieb, E. L.; Nelson, A. H. & Vogels, D. S. (2002). Study of orthodontic diagnosis and treatment procedures. Part 1. Results and trends. Journal of Clinical Orthodontics, Vol. 36, No. 1, pp. 553-568, ISSN 0168-0786.

8.      Megat Abdul Wahab R., Idris H., Yacob H., Zainal Ariffin S.H.: Comparison of self- and conventional-li- gating brackets in the alignment stage. Eur. J. Orthod. 2011, Advance Access published April 8, 2011. [Epub ahead 
of print].

9.      Pandis N., Eliades T., Partowi S., Bourauel C.: Forces exerted by conventional and self-ligating brackets during simulated first- and second-order corrections. Am. J. Orthod. Dentofac. Orthop. 2008, 133, 738–742.

10.  Rinchuse D.J., Miles P.G.: Self-ligating brackets: present and future. Am. J. Orthod. Dentofac. Orthop. 2007, 132, 216–222. 


11.  Harradine N.W.T.: Self-ligating brackets: where are we now? J. Orthod. 2003, 30, 262–273. 



12.  Baccetti T., Franchi L., Camporesi M., Defraia E.: Orthodontic forces released by low-friction versus conven- tional systems during alignment of apically or buccally malposed teeth. Eur. J. Orthod. 2011, 33, 50–54.

13.  Brauchli L.M., Senn C., Wichelhaus A.: Active and passive self-ligation – a myth? Angle Orthod. 2011, 81, 312–318.

14.  Voudouris J.C.: Interactive edgewise mechanisms: form and function comparison with conventional edgewise brackets. Am. J. Orthod. Dentofac. Orthop. 1997, 111, 119–140. 


15.  Harradine N.W.: Self-ligating brackets and treatment efficiency. Clin. Orthod. Res. 2001, 4, 220–227.

16.  Fleming P.S., DiBiase A.T., Sarri G., Lee R.T.: Efficiency of mandibular arch alignment with 2 preadjusted edge-wise appliances. Am. J. Orthod. Dentofac. Orthop. 2009, 135, 597–602.

17.  Fleming P.S., Johal A.: Self-ligating brackets in orthodontics. A systematic review. Angle Orthod. 2010, 80,575–584.

18.  Eberting J.J., Straja S.R., Tuncay O.C.: Treatment time, outcome, and patient satisfaction comparisons of Damon and conventional brackets. Clin. Orthod. Res. 2001, 4, 228–234.

19.  Proffit W.R., Fields H.W. Jr, Sarver D.M.: Zasady mechaniki w kontroli sił ortodontycznych. In: Ortodoncja Współczesna. Wyd. IV. Tom II. Eds.: Komorowska A. Elsevier Urban & Partner, Wrocław, 2010, 31–66. 


20.  Miles P.G.: SmartClip versus conventional twin brackets for initial alignment: is there a difference? Aust. Orthod. J. 2005, 21, 123–127. 


21.  Ong E., McCallum H., Griffin M.P., Ho C.: Efficiency of self-ligating vs conventionally ligated brackets during initial alignment. Am. J. Orthod. Dentofac. Orthop. 2010, 138, 138.e1–e7. 


22.  Pandis N., Polychronopoulou A., Eliades T.: Self-ligating vs. conventional brackets in the treatment of mandibular crowding: a prospective clinical trial of treatment duration and dental effects. Am. J. Orthod. Dentofac. Orthop. 2007, 132, 208–215. 


23.  Fleming P.S., DiBiase A.T., Sarri G., Lee R.T.: Mandibular arch dimensional changes with 2 preadjusted edge-wise appliances. Am. J. Orthod. Dentofac. Orthop. 2009, 136, 340–347.

24.  ScottP.,DiBiaseA.T.,SherriffM.,CobourneM.:AlignmentefficiencyofDamon3self-ligatingandconventional orthodontic bracket systems: a randomized clinical trial. Am. J. Orthod. Dentofac. Orthop. 2008, 134, 471–478. 


25.  Pandis N., Nasika M., Polychronopoulou A., Eliades T.: External apical root resorption in patients treated with conventional and self-ligating brackets. Am. J. Orthod. Dentofac. Orthop. 2008, 134, 646–651. 


26.  Pellegrini P., Sauerwein R., Finlayson T., McLeod J., Covell D.A. Jr, Maier T., Machida C.A.: Plaque re- tention by selfligating vs elastomeric orthodontic brackets: quantitative comparison of oral bacteria and detection with adenosine triphosphate-driven bioluminescence. Am. J. Orthod. Dentofac. Orthop. 2009, 135, 426.e1–e9. 


27.  Pandis N., Vlachopoulos K., Polychronopoulou A., Madianos P., Eliades T.: Periodontal condition of the mandibular anterior dentition in patients with conventional and self-ligating brackets. Orthod. Craniofac. Res.2008, 11, 211–215. 


28.  Fortini A., Lupoli M., Cacciafesta V.: A new low-friction ligation system. J. Clin. Orthod. 2005, 39, 464–471. 


29.  Papageorgiou; et al. (2014). "Clinical effects of pre-adjusted edgewise orthodontic brackets: a systematic review and meta-analysis.". Euro J orthod. 124 (4): 350–363. doi:10.1093/ejo/cjt064. PMID 24062378.