Functional Outcomes of Total Knee Arthroplasty in Primary Osteoarthrits Knee Using HSS Scoring System

Title: Functional Outcomes of Total Knee Arthroplasty in Primary Osteoarthrits Knee Using HSS Scoring System

Authors: Dr Shiekh Ajaz, Dr A.R.Badoo, Dr Muhammad, Dr Irfan Andleeb, Dr Parvaiz

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18535/jmscr/v4i9.75

Abstract

References

Corresponding Author

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Knee pain is one of the most common complaints that brings a patient to the doctor. Knee pain is caused by a wide spectrum of disorders, ranging from traumatic injuries to the soft tissue, disruption of ligaments or menisci, infections, rheumatoid arthritis, and degenerative conditions of the joint. Patients (often athletes) with traumatic injuries present in the acute setting, often with a history of antecedent trauma to the extremity, resulting in damage to ligaments, menisci, and bones. Occasionally, rheumatoid arthritis starts in the knee as a chronic mono-articular synovitis. Sooner or later, however, other joints become involved. Osteoarthritis is a chronic joint disorder in which there is progressive softening and disintegration of articular cartilage accompanied by new growth of a bone at the joint margins & capsular fibrosis. It differs from simple wear &tear in several ways: is asymmetrically distributed & often localized to one part of a joint & is related to abnormal loading rather than frictional wear^[1].

References

1. Solomon L., Warwick D. J., Nayagam S. Osteoarthitis. Apley’s System of Orthopa-edics and Fractures. 8th ed. p77 – 86

2. Dabov G. D. Miscellaneous Nontraumatic Disorders. Campbell’s Operative Orthopa-edics. 11^th ed. P999 – 1019 ;Crockarell JR jr, Guyton JL. Arthroscopy of the Knee. Campbell’s Orthopaedics. 11^thed. P 241-299.

3. Turek S. L. The Knee. Orthopaedics Principles & their Applications. 4th ed. P1367.

4. Ingemar F Petersson, TorstenBoegård, Tore Saxne, Alan J Silman, Björn Svensson: Radiographic osteoarthritis of the knee classiﬁed by the Ahlbäck and Kellgren & Lawrence systems for the tibiofemoral joint in people aged 35–54 years with chronic knee pain. Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases 1997;56:493–496

5. P. Weinrauch, N Myers, et al: Comparison of early postoperative rehabilitation outcome following total knee arthroplasty using different surgical approaches and instrumentation. Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery 2006;14(1):47-52

6. Emerson et al., 1999. Emerson RH, Ayers C, Higgins LL: Surgical closing in total knee arthroplasty. ClinOrthopRelat Res 1999; 368:176.

7. Husted and Toftgaard Jensen, 2005. Husted H, Toftgaard Jensen T: Influence of the pneumatic tourniquet on patella tracking in total knee arthroplasty: a prospective randomized study in 100 patients. J Arthroplasty 2005; 20:694

8. Insall, 1971. Insall J: A midline approach to the knee. J Bone Joint Surg 1971; 53A:1584

9. Insall, 1993. Insall JN: Surgical techniq-ues and instrumentation in total knee arthroplasty. In: Insall JN, ed. Surgery of the knee, New York: Churchill Livingstone; 1993.

10. Simmons et al., 1991. Simmons ED, Sullivan JA, Rackemann S, et al: The accuracy of tibial intramedullary alignment devices in total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 1991; 6:45.

11. Whiteside, 1999. Whiteside LA: Selective ligament release in total knee arthroplasty of the knee in valgus. ClinOrthopRelat Res 1999; 367:130.

12. Whiteside and Arima, 1995. Whiteside LA, Arima J: The anteroposterior axis for femoral rotational alignment in valgus total knee arthroplasty. ClinOrthopRelat Res 1995; 321:168.

13. DeWeese FT, Akbari Z, Carline E. Pain Control after Knee Arthroplasty: Intra-articular Versus Epidural Anesthesia. ClinOrthop 2001; 392: 226-

14. Orest MR. Total Joint Replacement Literature Review. Acute Care Perspectives 2004; Spring: 8-10

15. Hughes K, Kuffner L, Dean B. Effect of weekend physical therapy treatment on postoperative length of stay following total hip and total knee arthroplasty. Physiother Can 1993; 45: 245-249.

16. Shoji H, Solomonow M, Yoshino S, D'Ambrosia R, Dabezies E. Factors affecting postoperative flexion in total knee arthroplasty. Orthopedics 1990; 13: 643-649.

17. Hurley MV. Quadricepes weakness in osteoarthritis. CurrOpin Rheumatology 1999; 10:246-50.

18. Avramidis K, Strike PW et al. Effectiveness of electrical stimulation of the vastusmedialis muscle in rehabilitation of patients after total knee arthroplasty. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2003; 84: 1850-1853.

19. Cem Coskun AVCI, Deniz GULABI, et al: Minimal invasive midvastus versus standard parapatellar approach in total knee arthroplasty. Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc 2013; 47(1):1-7

20. Daniel Hernandez-Vaquero, Jose Manuel, et al: Total Knee Arthroplasty in the Elderly. Is there an age limit? The Journal of Arthroplasty, April 2006, Vol.21(3) :358-361

21. P. L. S. Li, J. Zamora et al: The results at ten years of the Insall-Burstein II total knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 1999;81-B:647-53.

22. Julian A., John Bartlett, et al: Patellar Resurfacing versus Retention in total knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 1996;78-B:226-8

Abstract

References

Corresponding Author

Call For Paper Volume 12 Issue 10 November 2024

JMSCR Menu

Impact Factor SJIF 2024: 7.892

Crossref - DOI

Editorial Policy

Frequency of Publication

Submission of Articles

Search