Abstract
Aims and Objective: To assess the relief of symptoms and analyse the surgical outcomes of women with pelvic organ prolapse (POP)
Material and Methods: A total of 100 women participated in the study. 17 patients were excluded as they were lost to follow-up and the data from the remaining 83 patients was analysed. Vaginal hysterectomy was done in all cases. Site specific repair was done according to the defect present. Patients were followed post operatively with regard to symptom relief and anatomical correction was analysed at 6 months using Pelvic Organ Prolapse-Quantification (POP-Q) System.
Results: The highest incidence of POP was between 61 to 70 years of age and in multiparous women with parity more than 4. 67.47% had stage III prolapse when measured using the POPQ classification. Vaginal bulge was the commonest complaint seen in 95.18% of the patients. Low back ache was The least relieved symptom at follow-up. However, the improvement of all symptoms was significant (p value<0.05). The mean length of Point Ba preoperatively was +0.67 (Range: -3 to +6, SD: 2.46) and postoperatively was -2.79 (Range: +2 to +3, SD: 0.78). The mean length of Point Bp preoperatively was +1.11 (Range: -3 to +5, SD: 2.38) and postoperatively was -2.76 (Range: +4 to -3, SD: 0.96). The mean length of point C preoperatively was -2.43 (Range: -8.5 to +10, SD: 5.17) and postoperatively was -7.93 (Range: -4 to -10, SD: 2.54). There was significant anatomical restoration of all POP-Q parameters postoperatively (p-value<0.05).
Conclusion: There is significant anatomical restoration and symptom relief after surgery.
Keywords: Pelvic organ prolapse, Pelvic organ prolapse quantification.
References
- American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Pelvic organ prolapse. ACOG Technical Bulletin. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 1996; 52:197–205.
- Barber MD, Maher C Epidemiology and outcome assessment of pelvic organ prolapse. Int Urogynecol J. 2013;24:1783-90
- Bump RC, Mattiasson A, Bø K, et al. The standardization of terminology of female pelvic organ prolapse and pelvic floor dysfunction. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1996; 175:10–17.
- Haylen BT, De Ridder D, Freeman RM, et al. An International Urogynecological Association (IUGA)/ International Continence Society (ICS) joint report on the terminology for female pelvic floor dysfunction. Int Urogynecol J. 2010; 21:5–26.
- Dhama V, Chaudhary R, Singh S, Singh M. Evaluation of pelvic organ prolapse by standardized pop q system for vaginal hysterectomy. Int J Reprod Contracept ObstetGynecol 2017; 6:2584-8.
- Hall AF, Theofrastous JP, Cundiff GW, Harris RL, Hamilton LF, Swift SE, Bump RC. Inter observer and intraobserver reliability of the proposed International Continence Society, Society of Gynecologic Surgeons, and American Urogynecologic Society pelvic organ prolapse classification system. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1996 Dec; 175(6):1467-70; discussion 1470-1. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9378(96)70091-1. PMID: 8987926.
- Swift S, Woodman P, O’Boyle A, et al.: Pelvic Organ Support Study (POSST): the distribution, clinical definition, and epidemiologic condition of pelvic organ support defects. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2005;192(3):795–806
- Urvashi Mishra, Poonam, Umakant Prasad. Pelvic organ prolapse - four years review from IGIMS, Patna. International Journal of Contemporary Medical Research 2019; 6(10):J1-J4.
- Olsen AL, Smith VJ, Bergstrom JO, Colling JC, Clark AL. Epidemiology of surgically managed pelvic organ prolapse and urinary incontinence. Obstet Gynecol. 1997 Apr; 89(4):501-6.
- Smith F, Holman C, Moorin R, Tsokos N. Lifetime risk of undergoing surgery for pelvic organ prolapse. ObstetGynecol2010; 116: 1096–1100.
- Lowenstein E, Ottesen B, Gimbel H. The incidence and lifetime risk of pelvic organ prolapse surgery in Denmark from 1977 to 2009. Int Urogynecol J 2015; 26: 49–55.
- Hove SMC, Al PG, Eijkemans MJ, Steegers- Theunissen RP, Burger CW, Vierhout ME. The prevalence of pelvic organ prolapse symptoms and signs and their relation with bladder and bowel disorders in a general female population. Int Urogynecol. J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2009; 20(9):1037-45.
- Janani GD, Jaya V, Lalitha D, A prospective study using POP-Q classification to analyse the outcome of vaginal hysterectomy with pelvic floor repair. Indian J ObstetGynecol Res 2017; 4 (4): 84-388.
- Dhama V, Chaudhary R, Singh S, Singh M. Evaluation of pelvic organ prolapse by standardized pop q system for vaginal hysterectomy. Int J Reprod Contracept ObstetGynecol 2017; 6:2584-8.
- Trutnovsky G, KamisanAtan I, Martin A, Dietz HP. Delivery mode and pelvic organ prolapse: a retrospective observational study. BJOG 2016; 123:1551-1556.
- Diez-Itza I, Arrue M, Ibanez L. Influence of mode of delivery on pelvic organ support 6 months portpartum. GynecolObstet Invest. 2011; 72:123-129.
- Handa VL, Nygaard I, Kenton K, et al. Pelvic organ support among primiparous women in the first year after childbirth. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2009; 20:1407-1411.
- Pradhan et al. Pelvic Organ Prolapse Assessment by POP-Q Technique.NJOG 2013 Jul- Dec;8(2):26-29
- Verma D. Factors associated with pelvic organ prolapse: a prospective study in a tertiary care hospital in Northern India. Int J Reprod Contracept ObstetGynecol 2016; 5:1862-4.
- UustalFornell E, Wingren G, Kjolhede P. Factors associated with pelvic floor dysfunction with emphasis on urinary and fecal incontinence and genital prolapse: an epidemiological study. Acta Obstet GynecolScand 2004; 83:383-9.
- Jelovsek JE, Maher C, Barber MD, Pelvic organ prolapse. Lancet 2007; 369:1027-38.
- Hendrix SL, Clark A, Nygaard I, Aragaki A, Barnabei V, McTiernan A. Pelvic organ prolapse in the Women’s Health Initiative: gravity and gravidity. Am J ObstetGynecol 2002; 186:1160-6.
- Awotunde OT, Fehintola AO, Ogunlaja OA, Olujide LO, Aaron OI, Bakare B et al. An audit of uterovaginal prolapse in Ogbomoso, south-west Nigeria. Res J Health Sci. 2016;4(1):31-6.
- Abdul Hakeem Jokhio, Raheela Mohsin Rizvi, Christine MacArthur. Prevalence of pelvic organ prolapse in women, associated factors and impact on quality of life in rural Pakistan: population-based study;BMC Women's Health (2020) 20:82.
- Ucar MG, Ilhan TT, Sanlikan F, Celik C. Sexual functioning before and after vaginal hysterectomy to treat pelvic organ prolapse and the effects of vaginal cuff closure techniques: a prospective randomized study. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2016;206:1-5.
- Ulrich D, Dwyer P, Rosamilia A, Lim Y, Lee J. The effect of vaginal pelvic organ prolapse surgery on sexual function. NeurourolUrodyn 2015; 34:316-21.
- Glavind K, Larsen T, Lindquist AS. Sexual function in women before and after surgery for pelvic organ prolapse. Acta ObstetGynecolScand 2015; 94:80-5.
- Thakar R, Chawla S, Scheer I, Barrett G, Sultan AH. Sexual function in following pelvic floor surgery. Int J GynaecolObstet 2008; 102:110-4.
- Occhino JA, Trabuco EC, Heisler CA, Klingele CJ, Gebhart JB. Changes in vaginal anatomy and sexual function after vaginal surgery. Int Urogynecol J 2011; 22:799-804.
- Helstrom L, Nilsson B. Impact of vaginal surgery on sexuality and quality of life in women with urinary incontinence or genital descensus. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2005;84:79-84.
- Barber MD, Brubaker L, Nygaard I, et al. Defining success after surgery for pelvic organ prolapse. Obstet Gynecol. 2009;114(3):600-609.
- Bradley CS, Zimmerman MB, Wang Q, Nygaard IE. Vaginal decent and pelvic floor symptom in post-menopausal women: a longitudinal study. Obstet Gynecol. 2008; 111;1148-53.
- Digesu GA, Chaliha C, Salvatore S, Hutchings A, Khullar V. The relationship of vaginal prolapse severity to symptoms and quality of life. Int J ObstetGynaecol. 2005;112:971-6.
- Marijke C, Hove S, Annelies L, Goudzwaard P, Marinus JC, Regine PM, et al. The prevalence of pelvic organ prolapse symptoms and sign and their relation with bladder and bowel disorder in a general female population. Int Urogynecol J. 2009; 20(9):1037-45.
- Swift SE, Tate SB, Nicholas J. Correlation of symptoms with degree of pelvic organ support in a general population of women: what is pelvic organ prolapse? Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2003; 189:372-9.
- Yuvaraj TP, Mahale AR. Assessment of prolapse by Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification (POP Q) System. Indian J Basic Appl Med Res. 2014;3:324- 30.
- Krissi H, Eitan R, Ram E, Peled Y (2012) How Accurate Is Preoperative Evaluation of Pelvic Organ Prolapse in Women Undergoing Vaginal Reconstruction Surgery? PLoS ONE 7(10): e47027. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0047027
- Gil Levy, Anat Beck, Anat From, et al. Preoperative Stratification in Pelvic Organ Prolapse: Can POP-Q Measurements Predict Surgical Outcome?.
Corresponding Author
Satyabhama Marandi
Professor, Dept of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, IMS and SUM Hospital, Bhubaneswar, India
DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.18535/jmscr/v9i2.18
