Abstract
Aim: To evaluate the usefulness of laparoscopic colorectal surgeries as safe, oncologic, operative approach versus open colorectal surgeries. Our study intends to analyze & review the current role of laparoscopy in colorectal malignancy in comparison to open surgery
Materials and Method: A total of 40 patients were operated for colorectal malignancies, 25 by open technique and l5 by laparoscopic technique.. Based on the site of tumour, standard surgical procedures were performed either by laparoscopic or by open technique. Patients were followed up periodically and details with regard to hospital stay, post-operative complications, oncological clearance & recurrence were recorded. Patients were followed up for a mean period of 3-24 months.
Conclusion: Laparoscopy has undoubtedly surpassed open surgery with its benefits of smaller incision, reduced postoperative pain, decreased post op narcotic requirement, shorter hospital stay & quicker recovery.
Keywords: laparoscopic colorectal surgery, open colorectal surgery, and colorectal malignancy.
References
- Bailey and love, 25ft edition, Short practice of surgery
- Manigot's abdominal operations- 11'h edition
- Nyhus, Mastery of surgery- 5ft edition
- Sabiston- textbook of surgery, 18s edition
- Schwarlz Principle of surgery, 9ft edition
- Skandalakis- Surgical anatomy
- Zollinger's atlas of surgical operations 8tr'edition
- Art of laparoscopic surgery, Textbook and atlas by Dr.C.Palanivelu
- Laparoscopic surgery of the abdomen, by Bruce Mac Fadyen
- Ravi j. Chokshi et al. Surgical management of colorectal cancer. A review of literature. Indian Joumal of Surgery (nov -dec 2009), 71:350-355
- Sergio Huedo et al.Current evidence based options in the management of adenocarcinoma of the rectum. Indian Jour:nal of Surgery ( nov- dec 2009), 7l:356-362
- J. Shukla et al.Current status of laparoscopic surgeries in gastrointestinal malignancies. Indian Joumal of Sugery (oct- dec 2008),70:261-264
- Biondo et al, Quality of mesorectum after laparoscopic resection for rectal cancer - results of an audited teaching programme in Spain. The Authors. Joumal Compilation, j.1463-1318, 2008. 01720.x
- Braga et al, Randomised clinical trial of laparoscopic versus open left colonic resection, British Joumal of Surgery 2010, 97:1 180-1 186.
- M .G. Tltherleigh et al, Management of early rectal cancer, British Joumal of Surgery, 2008, 95: 409-423.
- Pascual et al, Randomized clinical trial comparing inflammatory and angiogenic response after open versus laparoscopic curative resection for colorectal cancer. British joumal of Surgery, 2010.97 :1 638-1 645.
- G. Jayne et al, Five years follow up of the Medical Research Council CLASICC trial of laparoscopically assisted versus open surgery for colorectal cancer. Bristish Joumal of Surgery, 2010; 97:1638-1645.
- Seiichiro Yamomoto et al, Phase II trial to evaluate laparoscopic surgery for stage 0/1 rectal carcinoma. Japan Joumal of clinical oncology 2008; 38 (7) 497 -500.
- Karl Y. Bilimoria et al, Use & outcomes of laparoscopic assisted colectomy for cancer in the united states , Archives of Surgery, vol 143 (no.9), Sep 2008.
- Short term endpoints of conventional versus laparoscopic assisted surgery in patients with colorectal cancer (MRC CLASICC trial), Multicentre, randomized controlled trial. Lancet 3 65 : 17 18 -l 7 26, 200 5.
- Colon and rectum cancer staging by American Joint Committee on Cancer, 7s ed.
- C. Koopman, et al, Laparoscopic and minimally invasive resection of malignant colorectal diseases. Surgical clinics of North America.88 (2008) 1047-t072.
- Wilkinson et al. Surgical therapy for colorectal Adenocarcinoma. Gastroenterology clinics of North America,3T (2008) 253-267.
- Kenneth L. Meredith et al, The multidisciplinary management of rectal cancer. Surgical clinics of North America. 89 (2009) 177-215.
- A comparison of laparoscopically assisted and open colectomy for colon cancer, N Engl J Med 2004; 350 (20):2050-2059.
- History of laparoscopic surgery by Garth H. Ballantlare.
Corresponding Author
Dr N.Junior Sundresh
Professor, Department of Surgery, R.M.M.C.H, Annamalai University
DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.18535/jmscr/v7i7.23
