Abstract
Optimal nutrition during the neonatal period is essential for growth and development throughout infancy and into childhood. Nutrients can be provided either parenterally or enterally but the aim in all infants to use full enteral feeding as soon as it is safe to do so. Because of poor co-ordination sucking and swallowing, very low birth weight infants (VLBW) are fed by gavage and are unable to regulate their own enteral intake. Therefore the rate at which feeding to be advanced must be determined by caregivers. Based largely on retrospective studies, there is concern that advancing feeding too rapidly may increase the risk of Necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC). It is thought that one possible way to prevent this condition is to limit the amount of milk feeds that infants receive each day for the first few weeks after birth. On the other hand there are potential disadvantages associated with slowing the advancement of enteral feed volumes, such as establishment of full enteral nutrition are delaying. So, controversy exists regarding role of advancement of eneral feeding. So the review has discussed the effect of slow versus rapid rates of advancement of enteral feeding volume in VLBW infants.
References
- Brown EG, Sweet, AY. Preventing necrotizing enterocolitis in neonates. JAMA. 1978;240 (22):2452–4.
- Uauy RD, Fanaroff AA, Korones SB, Phillips EA, Phillips JB, Wright, LL. Necrotizing enterocolitis in very low birth weight infants: biodemographic and clinical correlates. National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Neonatal Research Network, Journal of Pediatrics. 1991;119 (4):630–8.
- Henderson G, Craig S, Brocklehurst P, McGuire W. Enteral feeding regimens and necrotising enterocolitis in preterm infants: a multicentre case-control study. Archives of Disease in Childhood, Fetal and Neonatal Edition. 2009;94 (2):120–3.
- Morgan J, Young L, McGuire W. Slow advancement of enteral feed volumes to prevent necrotising enterocolitis in very low birth weight infants. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2013;3:CD001241.
- Rayyis S, Ambalavanan N, Wright L, Carlo WA. Randomized trial of “slow” versus “fast” feed advancements on the incidence of necrotizing enterocolitis in very low birth weight infants. J Pediatr. 1999;134:293-97.
- Caple J, Armentrout D, Huseby V, Halbardier B, Garcia J, Sparks JW, et al. Randomized, controlled trial of slow versus rapid feeding volume advancement in preterm infants. Pediatrics. 2004;114:1597–600.
- Salhotra A, Ramji S. Slow versus fast enteral advancement in very low birth weight infants:a randomized controlled trial. Indian Pediatr. 2004;41:435- 41.
- Krishnamurthy S, Gupta P, Debnath S, Gomber S. Slow versus rapid enteral feeding advancement in preterm newborn infants 1000-1499g: a randomized controlled trial. Acta Paediatr. 2010;99:42-46.
- Karagol BS, Zenciroglu A, Okumus N, Polin RA. Randomized controlled trial slow vs rapid enteral feeding advancements on the clinical outcomes of preterm infants birth weight 750-1250 g. Journal of Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition. 2012;XX (X):1-6. Retrieved January 13, 2013, from http://pen.sagepub.com/cont ent/early/2012/06/13/0148607112449482
- WHO 2012, ‘Born too soon: the global action report on preterm birth’, World Health Organization, Geneva.
- WHO & UNICEF 2004, ‘Low birth weight: Country, regional and global estimates’, World Health Organization and United Nations Children’s Fund, Geneva.
- Bangladesh Bureau of Statistics 2004, National Low Birth Weight Survey of Bangladesh, 2003-2004, UNICEF.
- Lawn, JE, Cousens, S & Zupan, J 2005, ‘4 million neonatal deaths: when? Where? Why?’, Lancet, vol. 365, no. 9462, pp. 891–900.
- Fryer, JG & Ashford, JR 1972, ‘Trends in perinatal and neonatal mortality in England and Wales 1960–69’, British Journal of Preventive and Social Medicine, vol. 26, no. 1, pp. 1–9.
- Lau, C, Smith, EO &Schanler, RJ 2003,‘ Coordination of suck-swallow and swallow respiration in preterm infants, Acta Paediatr, vol. 92, pp. 721–7.
- Cavell, B 1982,‘Reservoir and emptying function of the stomach of the premature infant’, Acta PaediatrScand Suppl, vol. 296, pp. 60–1.
- Berseth, CL 1996, ‘Gastrointestinal motility in the neonate’, Clin Perinatol, vol. 23, pp. 179–90.
- .Edmond, K &Bhal, R 2006, ‘Optimal feeding of the low birth weight infants: Technical Review’, World Health Organization, pp 1-130.
- Schanler, RJ 2012, ‘Enteral nutrition for high risk neonates’, in Gleason CA & Devaskar SU (eds), Avery's Diseases of the Newborn, 9th edition, Philadelphia: WB Saunders, pp. 952-62.
- Berseth, CL 1990, ‘Neonatal small intestinal motility: the motor responses to feeding in term and preterm infants’, Journal of Pediatrics, vol. 117, no. 5, pp. 777–82.
- Fildel-Rimon, O, Friedman, S, Lev, E, Juster-Reicher, A, Amitay, M & Shinwell, ES 2004, ‘Early enteral feeding and nosocomial sepsis in very low birth weight infants’, Arch Dis Child, vol. 89, no. 4, pp 289-92.
- Flidel-Rimon, O, Branski, D & Shinwell, ES 2006, ‘The fear of necrotizing enterocolitis versus achieving optimal growth in preterm infants--an opinion’, Acta Paediatrica, vol. 95, no. 11, pp. 1341–4.
- Boyle, EM, Menon, G, Elton, R & McIntosh, N 2004, ‘Variation in feeding practice in preterm and low birth weight infants in Scotland’, Early Human Development, vol. 77, pp. 125–6.
- Patole, S & Muller, R 2004, ‘Enteral feeding of preterm neonates: a survey of Australian neonatologists, Journal of Maternal- Fetal & Neonatal Medicine, vol. 16, pp. 309-14.
- Hay, WW Jr 2008, ‘Strategies for feeding the preterm infant’, Neonatology, vol. 94, pp. 245–54.
- Klingenberg, C, Embleton, ND, Jacobs, SE, O’Connell, LAF &Kuschel, CA 2012, ‘Enteral feeding practices in very preterm infants: an international survey’, Archives of Disease in Childhood, Fetal and Neonatal Edition, vol. 97, no. 1, pp. 56–61.
- Morgan, J, Young, L & McGuire, W 2011, ‘Delayed introduction of progressive enteral feeds to prevent necrotising enterocolitis in very low birth weight infants’, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, no.3, CD001970.
- Patole, SK & de Klerk, N 2005, ‘Impact of standardised feeding regimens on incidence of neonatal necrotising enterocolitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies’, Archives of Disease in Childhood, vol. 90, no. 2, pp. 147-51.
- Book, LS, Herbst, JJ & Jung, AL 1976, ‘Comparison of fast and slow feeding rate schedules to the development of necrotizing enterocolitis’, J Pediatr, vol. 89, pp. 463– 466.
- McKeown, RE, Marsh, TD, Amarnath, U, Garrison, CZ, Addy, CL, Thompson, SJ, et al. 1992, ‘Role of delayed feeding and of feeding increments in necrotizing enterocolitis’, J Pediatr, vol. 121, pp. 764– 770.
- Wright, LL, Uauy, RD, Younes, N, Fanaroff, AA, Korones, SB & Joseph, B 1993, ‘Rapid advances in feeding increase the risk of necrotizing enterocolitis in very low birth weight infants’, Pediar Res, vol. 33, pp. 313A.
- . Guillet, R, Stoll, BJ, Cotton, CM, Gantz, M, McDonald, S, Poole, WK, et al 2006, ‘Association of H2- blocker therapy and higher incidence of necrotizing enterocolitis in very low birth weight infants’, Pediatrics, vol.117, no. 2, pp. 137-42.
- Bisquera, JA, Cooper, TR &Berseth, CL 2002, ‘Impact of necrotizing enterocolitis on length of stay and hospital charges in very low birth weight infants’, Pediatrics, vol. 109, pp. 423-428.
- Stoll, BJ, Hansen, NI, Adams-Chapman, I, Fanaroff, AA, Hintz, SR, Vohr, B, et al. 2004, ‘Neurodevelopment and growth impairment among extremely low-birth-weight infants with neonatal infection’, JAMA, vol. 292, pp. 2357-65.
Corresponding Author
Dr Firoz Ahmed
Resident Physician, Department of Paediatrics, Sher-e-Bangla Medical College Hospital, Barisal, Bangladesh
Contact: 01716527431, Email: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.18535/jmscr/v6i10.83
