Abstract
Purpose
- To study the immediate and delayed complications of stapling devices within one year of the surgeries.
- To study the safety of stapling devices in elective and emergency surgeries.
- To study the efficacy of stapling devices in elective and emergency surgeries.
Method: Patients were selected for anastomosis using stapled or hand sewn randomly and the outcomes were evaluated and significant associations were determined using statistical tests and these associations were compared to different similar studies done aroun the globe
Conclusion: Stapled anastomosis were found to be superior in terms of reduced operative time , reduced blood loss and reduced time to start oral diet and these finding were compared and found to corroborate with similar studies done previously although further study and trials need to be done for further analysis
Keywords: Stapler selection, mechanical stapler , hand sewn, anastomosis
References
- Surgery Today, Volume 34, Number 2/ February 2004.
- McGuire J, Wright IC, Leverment JN. Surgical staplers: a review, J R Coll surg Edinb. 1997 Feb; 42(1):1-9.
- Buriev IM, Knazev MV. Stapling techniques in operations on the gastrointestinal tract, Mastery of surgery, Vol.1, Web only chapters, 5th www.masteryofsurgery.com
- Non-suture methods of vascular anastomosis, British Journal of Surgery, 19th Feb 2003: Volume 90, Issue 3, Pages 262-271.
- Picardi N. History of mechanical sutures in digestive system surgery, Ann Ital Chir. 2002 Han-Feb; 73 (1):1-10.
- Attigah N, Schafer M. Surgical Staplers, Atlas of Gastro-intestinal and Hepato-pancreato-billiary Surgery: springerlink.com
- Anselmi A, Salvini P, Crozzoli L, Manenti F, Papotti R, Sallusti M et al. Comparison of mechanical and manual anastomoses in emergency gastric resection. G Chir 1991: 12:81-3.
- Scher KS, Scott-Conner C, Jones CW, Leach M. A comparison of stapled and sutured anastomoses in colonic operations. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1982; 155: 489-93.
- Kusunoki M, Ikeuchi H, Yanagi H, Shoji Y, Yamamura T. A comparison of stapled and hand-sewn anastomoses in Crohn’s disease. Dig Surg 1998; 15: 679-82.
- Choy PY, Bissett IP, Docherty JG, Parry BR, Merrie AE. Stapled versus hand sewn methods of ileocolic anastomoses. Cochrane Database syst Rev. 2007 Jul 18; (3): CD004320.
- Beitler AL, Urschel JD. Comparison of stapled and hand-sewn esophagogastric anastomosis. Am J surg. 1998 Apr; 175 (4): 337-40.
- Urschel JD, Blewett CJ, Bennett WF, Miller JD, Young JE. Hand-sewn or stapled esophagogastric anastomoses after esophagectomy for cancer: meta-analysis of randomized controlled trails. Dis Esophagus. 2001; 14 (3-4): 212-7.
- Brundage SI, Jurkovich GJ, Hoyt DB, Patel NY, Ross SE, Marburger R et al. stapled versus sutured gastrointestinal anastomoses in the trauma patient: a multicenter trial. WTA Multi-institutional Study Group. Western Trauma Association. J Trauma 2001; 51: 1054-61.
- Docherty JG, McGregor JR, Akyol AM, Murray GD, Galloway DJ. Comparison of manually constructed and stapled anastomoses in colorectal surgery. West of Scotland and Highland Anastomosis Study Group. Ann Surg 1995; 221: 176-84.
- Ravitch MM, Steichen FM. Techniques of staple suturing in the gastrointestinal tract. Ann Surg 1972; 175: 815-37.
- Lustosa SA, Matos D, Atallah AN, Castro AA. Stapled versus hand sewn methods for colorectal anastomosis surgery: A systematic review of randomized controlled trails, sao Paulo Med J. 2002 Sep 2; 120 (5): 132-6.
- Catena f, La Donna M, Gagliardi S, Avanzolini A, Taffurelli M. Stapled versus hand-sewn anastomoses in emergency intestinal surgery: results of a prospective randomized study, Surg Today. 2004; 34 (2): 123-6.
- Negro G, Di Blasio V, Arciero G, Fumo F, De Blasio RA. Manual and stapled sutures in digestive surgery; a comparative evaluation, G Chir. 1992 Apr; 13 (4): 186-8.
- McManus KG, Ritchie AJ, McGuigan J, Stevenson HM, Gibbons JR. Sutures, staplers, leaks and strictures. A review of anastomoses in oesophageal resection at Royal Victoria Hospital, Eur J Cardiothoracic Surg 1990; 4: 97-100.
- Izbicki JR, Gawad KA, Quirrenbach S, Hosch SB, Breid V, Knoefel WT et al. Is the stapled suture in visceral surgery still justified? A prospective controlled randomized study of cost effectiveness of manual and stapler suture, Chirurg 1998 Jul; 69 (7): 725-34.
- Cerraldi CM, Rypins EB, Monahan M, Chang B, Sarfeh IJ. Comparison of continuous single layer polypropylene anastomosis with double layer and stapled anastomoses in elective colon resection. Am Surg 1993; 59: 168-71.
- Yamamoto T, Bain IM Mylonakis E, allan RN, Keighley Mr. Stapled functional end-to-end anastomosis versus sutured end-to-end anastomosis after ileocolonic resection in Crohn’s Disease. Scand J Gastroenterol 1999; 34: 708-13.
- Luukkonen P, Jarvinen H. Stapled vs. Hand-sutured ileoanal anastomosis in restorative proctocolectomy. A prospective, randomized study. Arch Surg 1993; 128: 437-40.
- Fingerhut A, Elhadad A, Hay Jm, Lacaine f, Flamant Y. Infraperitoneal colorectal anastomosis: hand-sewn versus circular staples. A controlled clinical trial. French associations for Surgical Research. Surgery 1994; 116: 484-90.
- Chassin JL (1978) esophagogastrectomy: data favoring end-to-side anastomosis. Ann Surg 188:22-27.
- Griffen FD, Jnight CD Sr, Whitaker JM, Knight CD Jr. The double stapling technique for low anterior rsection. Results, modifications and observations. Ann Surg. 1990 Jun; 211 (6): 745-51; discussion 751-2.
- Jameson L Chassin, M D, Kenneth M. Rifkind, M. D, Barry Sussman, M. D, Barry Kassel, M.D, Arnold Fingaret, M. D, Sharon Dragor, M.D, Pamela Chassin. Ann Surg 00358:0111, 27 December 1977.
- Mr.W.G.Everett, P.J.Friend, J. Forty. Comparison of stapling and handsuture for left-sided large bowel anastomosis. British journal of surgery, volumes 73, 5; 345-348.
Corresponding Author
Dr Ali Zaid Anwar
DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.18535/jmscr/v6i7.170
