Abstract
Objective: To determine the histomorphological changes associated with various types ofinterface dermatitis (ID) and to correlate the clinical features with the histological diagnosis.
Methods: This was a observational study. A total of 100 patients were included in the study. Nail clippings for fungal culture, skin biopsy for histopathology, pus for culture and sensitivity were also recorded as and when required. A dermatologist examined all of the patients for examination of the skin, hair, nail, and mucosal tissues. Culture and biopsy of the lesions were done if needed. Pathologic examinations were done on specimens with hematoxylin-eosin staining.
Results: Most of the patients were in the age band of 21-30 (39%). More than half of patients were females (67%). Epidermis hyperkeratosis was most common (76%). Lichen planuspilaris was diagnosed in 18.0% patients. Oral Lichen planus was diagnosed in 6% patients.
Conclusion: It is concluded that histopathology is a dependable tool for identifying the underlying cause in lichenoid eruptions, for an early diagnosis and the appropriate treatment.
Keywords: Interface dermatitis, Dermatology, Histomorphological,
References
- Crowson AN, Magro CM, Mihm MC Jr. Interface Dermatitis. Arch Pathol Lab Med 2008 Apr; 132 (4) : 652-66.
- Le Boit PE. Interface Dermatitis. How specific are its histopathologic features? Arch Dermatol 1993; 129:1324-28.
- Virendra Sehgal, G Srivastava et al. Lichenoid tissue reaction/Interface derm-atitis: Recognition, classification, etiology & clinicopathological overtones. Indian Journal of Dermatology ,venerology and Leprology 2011; Vol 77: Issue 4:418-430.
- Tilly JJ, Drolat BA, Esterley NB et al. Lichenoid eruptions in Children. J Am Acad Dermato;2004;51:606-24.
- Rajiv Joshi. SYMPOSIUM DERMATOPATHOLOGY. Indian Journal of Dermatology, Venereology &Leprology 2013;79:3: 349-59.
- Le Boit P E , Interface dermatitis: A method based on epidermal changes , university of California San Francisco , 2013
- Tilly JJ, Drolat BA, Esterly NB. Lichenoid eruptions in children. J Am AcadDermatol 2004;51:606-24.
- Hegde VK, Khadilkar UN. A clinicopathological study of interface dermatitis. IJPM. 2014 July;57(3):386-9.
- Mahesh Kumar U, Balasaheb Ramling Yelikar, Arun C Inamadar, Swaroopa Umesh, Amrita Singhal, Anirudha V Kushtagi. J ClinDiagn Res. 2013 Feb;7(2):312-31.
- Bereston ES, Lichenoid dermatitis- observation of two hundred cases from the dermatology section, medical branch, dewitt general hospital, auburn California, J of investigative dermatology 1946: 69-83.
- Salim T, Shenoi SD, Balachandran C, Mehta VR. Lichen amyloidosus: A study of clinical, histopathologic and immunofluorescence findings in 30 cases. Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol 2005;71:166-9.
- Sehgal VN, Rege V, Lichen planus: An appraisal of 147 cases Ind J Dermat 1974 40(3):104-07.
Corresponding Author
Dr Vivek Gupta
HOD, Department of Pathology, Hind Institute of Medical Sciences,
Safedabad, Barabanki
DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.18535/jmscr/v6i2.201
