Abstract
Introduction: IUGR complicates up to 10%of pregnancies. Cerebroplacental ratio (CPR-MCA PI/ Umbilical artery PI) is emerging as a good tool for the prediction of perinatal adverse outcomes in IUGR babies. We attempted to study the sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive value of CPR in predicting adverse perinatal outcome.
Materials and Methods: It is a prospective study done in the Dept of O&G at Govt Medical College, Thiruvananthapuram. 65 cases of clinically detected ultrasound confirmed cases of IUGR in third trimester were the subjects. Serial Doppler measurements of the umbilical artery, middle cerebral artery at 1-3 weeks interval were recorded till a decision for termination of pregnancy was taken. Last measurement values were taken for statistical analysis. Based on these measurements patients were classified into 3 groups.
Group 1-IUGR with normal Doppler velocimetry in all 3 vessels
Group 2-IUGR with abnormal UA PI alone, CPR <1
Group 3-IUGR abnormal MCA and UA PI, CPR>1.
Results: Pregnancy outcome measures included gestational age at delivery, mode of delivery, birth weight, Apgar scores, presence of meconium staining of amniotic fluid and need for NICU admissions more than 24 hours. Data was compared among 3 groups. All outcome measures showed a statistically significant difference among groups (p<.05) except mode of delivery (p>.05). CPR had a sensitivity of 54.5%, specificity of 87.5%, +predictive value of 81.8 % and negative predictive value of 65% in predicting adverse perinatal outcome.
References
- The Investigation and Management of the Small–for–Gestational–Age Fetus Green–top Guideline No. 31 2nd Edition | February 2013 | Minor revisions – January 2014
- Asma Khalil, Basky Thilaganathan. Progression of Doppler abnormalities in intrauterine growth restriction, Role of uteroplacental and fetal Doppler in identifying fetal growth restriction at term Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2008; 32: 160–167
- J. Sebire. Umbilical artery Doppler revisited: pathophysiology of changes in intrauterine growth restriction revealed Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2003; 21: 419–422
- Greggory R. De Vore, The importance of the cerebroplacental ratio in the evaluation of fetal well-being in SGA and AGA foetuses expert review, ajog.2015.05.024
- Ebbing, S.Ramussen, T.Kiserud. Middle cerebral artery blood flow velocities and pulsatility index and the cerebroplacental pulsatility ratio: longitudinal reference ranges and terms for serial measurements. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2007; 30: 287–296.
- Baschat, A. A. and Gem Bruch U. The cerebroplacental Doppler ratio revisited. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2003, 21: 124–127.
- Murata, S., Nakata, M., Sumie, M. and Sugino, N. (2011), The Doppler cerebroplacental ratio predicts non-reassuring fetal status in intrauterine growth restricted fetuses at term. Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology Research, 37: 1433–1437.
- Ray O. Bahado-Singh, Ertug Kovanci, Andrea Jeffres, Giancarlo Mari. The Doppler cerebroplacental ratio and perinatal outcome in intrauterine growth restriction,American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Vol 180, Issue 3, 750 - 756
- Karen Flood, Julia Unterscheider, Sean Daly, Michael P. Geary, Mairead M. Kennelly, Fionnuala M. The role of brain sparing in the prediction of adverse outcomes in intrauterine growth restri-ction: results of the multi centre PORTO Study Am J Obstet Gynecol 2014; 211:288.e1-5.
- Gilbert WM1, Danielsen B Pregnancy outcomes associated with intrauterine growth restriction..Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2003 Jun; 188(6):1596-9; discussion 1599-601.
Corresponding Author
Dr. Rajeena Babu R
Asst. Professor, Dept of OBG, SATH,
Govt. Medical College, Trivandrum
DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.18535/jmscr/v5i11.178
