Abstract
Background: Neonates are subjected to frequent painful procedures. Neonates can perceive pain which can affect neurodevelopmental outcome. It is necessary to assess and manage pain during various procedures.
Objective: To compare the effect of oral 25% dextrose and placebo in reducing neonatal pain after venepuncture.
Methods: A randomised control study was done in a tertiary care hospital. Neonates were randomised into a placebo group using sterile water and intervention group using 25% dextrose. Two ml of test solution was administered to neonate two minutes before the procedure. Neonatal pain response was assessed at 0 – 30 sec, 1 -1½ min, 3 – 3½ min, 5 -5½ min after venepuncture using PIPP score. Cry time after venepuncture was recorded.
Results: Mean PIPP scores at 0 – 30 sec, 1 -1½ min, 3 – 3½ min, 5 -5½ min after venepuncture were 11.475, 10.125, 9.125, 7.575 in placebo group; 8.55, 7.225, 6.0, 4.5 in 25% dextrose group respectively. Mean cry time was 105.65 sec in placebo group and 60.85 sec in 25% dextrose group.
Conclusion: Oral 25% dextrose significantly reduced neonatal pain compared to placebo after venepuncture.
Keywords: 25% dextrose, PIPP, Venepuncture.
Abbreviations: 25% D - 25% dextrose, PIPP – Premature Infant Pain Profile, sec – seconds, min – minutes.
References
- Hockenberry, M., & Wilson, D. (2012). Wong's essentials of paediatric nursing (9th ed). Mospy Elsevier: 174.
- Clifford, G. (2008). Pain management considerations in the neonatal patient. Topics in Pain Management, 23(7): 1–7.
- Krishnan L. Pain relief in neonates. J neonatal Surg [Internet]. 2013;2(2):19.
- Lago P, Garetti E, Merazzi D, et al. Guidelines for procedural pain in the newborn. ActaPaediatr. 2009; 98(6): 932–9.
- Eric C Eichenwald et al. Preventing and treating Pain and Stress among Infants in the Newborn Intensive Care Unit. Cloherty and Stark’s Manual of Neonatal Care.8th Edition:1021 – 25.
- Sahoo J et al. Expressed Breast Milk vs 25% Dextrose in procedural pain in neonates: A Double Blind Randomised Controlled Trial. Indian Pediatr. 2013; 50: 203–7.
- Witt N, Coynor S, Edwards C, Bradshaw H.A Guide to Pain Assessment and Management in the Neonate. Curr Emerg Hosp Med Rep. 2016;4:1-10.
- Pillai Riddell R, Racine N, Gennis H, Turcotte K, Uman L, Horton R, et al. Non-pharmacological management of infant and young child procedural pain. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2015;(12).
- Stevens B, Yamada J, Ohlsson A, Haliburton S, Shorkey A. Sucrose for analgesia in newborn infants undergoing painful procedures. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2016, Issue 7. Art. No.: CD001069.DOI: 10.1002/ 14651858. CD001069.
- Kassab M, Sheehy A, King M, Fowler C, Foureur M. A double-blind randomised controlled trial of 25% oral glucose for pain relief in 2-month old infants undergoing immunisation. Int J Nurs Stud. 2012;49(3):249–56.
- Bueno et al. Breast Milk and Glucose for Pain Relief in Preterm Infants: A Noninferiority Randomized Controlled Trial. Pediatrics 2012; 129: 664
- Costa MC, Eckert GU, Fortes BG, Fortes Filho JB, Silveira RC, Procianoy RS. Oral glucose for pain relief during examination for retinopathy of prematurity: a masked randomized clinical trial. Clinics. 2013;68(2):199-203.
- Ramesh Agarwal et al. Pain and Developmental Supportive Care. AIIMS Protocols in Neonatology. 1st 2015;378 – 380.
- Foo H, Mason P. Analgesia accompanying food consumption requires ingestion of hedonic foods. J Neurosci. 2009;29(41): 13053–62.
- Marin Gradin et al. Feeding and Glucose – additive effects on pain reduction in newborns. Early Human Development. 2004;77: 57 – 65.
- Fusun Okan et al. Analgesia in preterm newborns: the comparative effects of sucrose and glucose. Eur J Pediatr 2007 Oct: 166(10): 1017–1024.
- Ballanntyne M, Stevens B, McAllister M, Dionne K, Jack A. Validation of the premature infant pain profile in the clinical setting. Clin J Pain. 1999;15: 297-303.
Corresponding Author
Abinaya .S
Postgraduate, Department of Paediatrics,
Rajah Muthiah Medical College and Hospital, Chidambaram, Tamilnadu
DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.18535/jmscr/v5i11.140
