Abstract
Cancer cervix is the second most common cancer worldwide. It is more prevalent in low resource settings. But it is a preventable disease that’s why in developed countries its incidence has decreased due to effective screening programmes. A study was done in AIMSR Bathinda to compare different screening methods that are VIA, Pap smear and Colposcopy. Results showed that VIA is a good screening method, simple test with low cost and high sensitivity in comparison to Pap smear. It can be easily used in low resource settings. Sensitivity of VIA is 89.4% as compared to 79% for PAP with less specificity. So VIA is a simple objective test. Its results are available immediately allowing further investigations in the same visit. To conclude VIA has a good role in screening programme in low resource settings and can become an alternative screening tool.
References
- Ferley J, Shin HR, BrayF, Forman D, Mathers C, Parkin DM. Estimates of worldwide burden of cancer in 2008. GLOBOCAN 2008. Int J Cancer 2010; 127:2893-917
- Aswasthy S, Mariya Amin Quereshi , Beteena Kurian, Leelamoni K. Cervical cancer screening: current knowledge & practice among women in rural population of Kerela, India. Indian J Med Res 2012; 136(2):205-10.
- Johnson C. Conventional cytology. In: Apgar BS, Brotzman GL, Spitzer M(eds). Colposcopy principles and practice. An integerated Text book and atlas. Philadel-phia, WB. Sounders Company 2002; 52-6.
- Saraiya U. Relevance of cytology services in India today. J Obstet Gynacol India 1986; 36:379-84.
- Arbyn Mar, Sankaranarayanan Rengas-wamy, Munwongs Richard, Keita Namory, Dolo Amandou. Pooled analysis of the accuracy of five cervical cancer screening tests assessed in eleven studies in Africa and India. Int J Cancer 2008; 123:153-60.
- Khan MA, Raja FY, Ishfaq G, Tahir F, Subhan F, Kazi BM et al. PAP screening for precancerous conditions of the cervical cancer. Pak J Med Res 2005; 44:111-3, back to cited text no 3.
- Sankaranarayanan R, Esmy PO, Rajkumar R, Muwonge R, Swaminathan R, Sanyhakumari S, et al. Effect of visual screening on cervical cancer incidence and mortality in Tamil Nadu, India: a cluster randomized control trial. Lancer 2007; 370:398-406[Pub Med]
- Catterina F, Julia G. Critical Review. In: Visual inspection of the uterine cervix with acetic acid (VIA): A critical review and selected articles. Washington DC. Pan American Health Organisation (PAHO) 2003:8.
- Dukes University. Evaluation of cervical cytology. Rockville, Md. Department of health and Human Services. Public Health Service, Agency for Health Care Policy and Research, 1999; AHCPR publication #99, E101.
- Gaffikin, Lynne DrPH. Performance of visual inspection with acetic acid for cervical cancer screening: a qualitative summary of evidence to date. Obstet Gynaecol Surv 2003; 58(8).
- Doh AS. Visual Inspection with acetic acid and cytology as screening methods for cervical lesions in Cameroon. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2005:89.
- Shankarnarayanan R, Mahe C. Cervical cancer control in developing world. Indian J Gynaecol Oncol 2004; 4:5-13.
- Goel A, Gandhi G, Batra S. Visual Inspection of the cervix with acetic acid for cervical intraepithelial lesions. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2005; 88:25-30.
- Singh Kavita N, More Shefali. Visual Inspection of cervix with acetic acid (VIA) in early diagnosis of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) and early cancer cervix. J Obstet Gynaecol India 2010; 60: 55-60.
- Hend S. Saleh. Can Visual inspection with acetic acid be used as an alternative to PAP smear in screening cervical cancer? Middle East Fertility Society Jounal 2014;19:187-191.
- Bharani Bharti, Phatak Satish R. Acetic acid visualisation of the cervix an alternative to colposcopy in evaluation of cervix at risk.J Obstet Gynecol India 2005; 55(6):530-533.
Corresponding Author
Goyal Ritu
Assistant professor, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology
AIMSR, Bathinda, Punjab, India
DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.18535/jmscr/v5i11.10
