Abstract
Background: The most common congenital abnormality of urinary tract is duplex kidney but horseshoe kidney (HSK) represent the most common congenital renal fusion anomaly.1 Pelvi-ureteric junction obstruction (PUJO) is a relatively common finding during urological investigation. The combination of HSK and PUJO occurs in 15-33% of patients. Surgical treatment can be challenging in such cases. Herein, we report our experience of management of PUJO in HSK.
Materials and Methods: In between July 2012 and April 2017, fourteen patients were identified with the horseshoe kidney having PUJO. There demographic, diagnostic, and procedural data were recorded. All cases were investigated with renal ultrasonography, computed tomography (CT) and renal scintigraphy. Surgical repair of PUJO by pyeloplasty was done in nine cases. Hellstrom repair was done in three cases and two cases underwent nephrectomy. Treatment outcome was assessed in terms of quality of life, recurrence and complications.
Results: Median age of presentation was 30.78 years (9-51 years) . At a mean follow-up of 22 months all were symptomatic free. Out of fourteen, ten patients presented with flank pain. Incidental hydronephrosis was detected in two patients, and two had a recurrent febrile urinary tract infection. Out of nine patients who underwent pyeloplasty, Anderson-Hynes dismembered pyeloplasty was performed in five and foley y-v plasty was performed in four patients. Hellstrom repair was done in three cases and two patients underwent nephrectomy. Laparoscopy surgey was done in two patients each of Anderson-Hynes dismembered pyeloplasty and Hellstrom repair. Nephrectomy was done in one patient by laparoscopy who developed chyluria later on and was managed conservatively. No complications were detected in others during follow-up and all had a good quality of life.
Conclusions: PUJO in horseshoe kidneys is a surgical challenge. Treatment should be individualized depending upon the clinical profile of patient.
Keywords: Horseshoe kidney (HSK); Pelvi-ureteric junction obstruction (PUJO); Pyeloplasty; Laparoscopy.
References
- Singh S, Das P, Vikas V, Soni J. Foley Y-V Plasty in the Management of the Lower Pole Pelvi-ureteric Junction Obstruction in Incomplete Duplicated System. JMSCR. 2017 May; 5(5) : 22587-90.
- Yoshinaga K, Kodama K, Tanii I et al. Morphological study of a horseshoe kidney with special reference to the vascular system. Anat Sci Int 1999; 15: 230–233.
- Schuster T, Dietz HG, Schütz S. Anderson-Hynes pyelolasty in horseshoe kidney in children: Is it effective without symphysiotomy? Pediatr Surg Int 1999; 15: 230–233.
- Margreiter M, Hernandez DJ, Lang EK et al. Horseshoe kidney with giant hydronephrosis secondary to ureteropelvic junction obstruction. J Urol 2010; 183: 329.
- Bove P, Ong AM, Rha K et al. Laparo-scopic management of ureteropelvic junction obstruction in patients with upper urinary tract anomalies. J Urol 2004; 171: 77–79.
- Al-Shamsi A, Abudaia J, Al-Sabban E et al. Horseshoe kidney with hydronephrosis secondary to ureteric stenosis: Construction of a ureter from the renal pelvis. BJU Int 1999; 83: 146–147.
- Donohue PF. Division of horseshoe kidney for relief of junction disease uretero-pelvic junction obstruction. J Urol 1932; 27: 59–72.
- Shimkus EM, Mekhanna I. Hydronephrosis in a horseshoe Pediatr 1990; 31: 87–91 kidney. Urol Nefrol (Mosk) 1993; 3: 48–51.
- Dewan PA, Ng KP, Ashwood PJ. Pelviureteric junction obstruction: age of presentation versus pathology. J Paed Child Health 1998; 34: 384–6.
- Yohannes P, Smith AD. The endouro-logical management of complications associated with horseshoe kidney. J Urol2002; 168: 5–8.
- Perlmutter AD, Retik AB, Bauer SB. Anomalies of the upper urinary tract. In: Walsh PC, Gittes RF, Perlmutter AD, Stamey TA, editors. Campbell's Urology. 5th ed. Philadelphia: WB Saunders Co; 1986. pp. 1686–92.
- Lampel A, Hohenfellner M, Schultz-Lampel D, Lazica M, Bohnen K, Thürof JW. Urolithiasis in horseshoe kidneys: Therapeutic management. Urology. 1996;47:182–6.
- Das S, Amar AD. Ureteropelvic junction obstruction with associated renal anomalies. J Urol. 1984;131:872–4.
- Pitts WR, Jr, Muecke EC. Horseshoe kidneys: A 40-year experience. J Urol. 1975;113:743–6.
- Sharma SK, Bapna BC. Surgery of the horseshoe kidney — An experience of 24 patients. Aust N Z J Surg. 1986;56:175–7.
- Culp OS, Winterringer JR. Surgical treatment of horseshoe kidney: Comparison of results after various types of operations. J Urol. 1955;73:747–56.
- Salem YH, Majd M, Rushton HG, Belman AB. Outcome analysis of pediatric pyeloplasty as a function of patient age, presentation and differential renal function. J Urol. 1995;154:1889–93.
- Kehagias DT, Gouliamos AD, Vlahos LJ. Horseshoe kidney associated with anomalous inferior vena cava. Eur Radiol. 1999;9:935–6.
- Siqueira TM Jr, Nadu A, Kuo RL, Paterson RF, Lingeman JE, Shalhav AL. Laparoscopic treatment for uretero-pelvic junction obstruction. Urology 2002; 60: 973–8.
- Jabbour ME, Goldfischer ER, Stravodimos KG, Klima WJ, Smith AD. Endopyelo-tomy for horseshoe and ectopic kidneys. J Urol1998; 160: 694–7.
- Nakamura K, Baba S, Tazaki H. Endopyelotomy in horseshoe kidneys. J Endourol1994; 8: 203–6.
- Bellman GC, Yamaguchi R. Special considerations in endopyelotomy in a horseshoe kidney. Urology1996; 47: 582–6.
- Bauer JJ, Bishoff JT, Moore RG, Chen RN, Iverson AJ, Kavoussi LR. Laparosc-opic versus open pyeloplasty: assessment of objective and subjective outcome. J Urol1999; 162: 692–5.
- Janetschek G, Peschel R, Altarac S, Bartsch G. Laparoscopic and retroperito-neoscopic repair of ureteropelvic junction obstruction. Urology1996; 47: 311–6.
- Hsu TH, Presti JC Jr. Anterior extraper-itoneal approach to laparoscopic pyeloplasty in horseshoe kidney: a novel technique. Urology2003; 62: 1114–6.
- Sung GT, Gill IS, Hsu TH. Robotic-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty: a pilot study. Urology1999; 53: 1099–103.
- Hellstrom J, Giertz G, Lindblom K: Pathogenesis and treatment of hydronep-hrosis. J Belge Urol. 1951; 20: 1-6.
- Gundeti MS, Reynolds WS, Duffy PG, Mushtaq I: Further experience with the vascular hitch (laparoscopic transposition of lower pole crossing vessels): an alternate treatment for pediatric ureterovascular ureteropelvic junction obstruction. J Urol. 2008; 180: 1832-6; discussion 1836.
- Meng MV, Stoller ML: Hellström technique revisited: laparoscopic management of ureteropelvic junction obstruction. Urology. 2003; 62: 404-8; discussion 408-9.
- Simforoosh N, Javaherforooshzadeh A, Aminsharifi A, Soltani MH, Radfar MH, Kilani H: Laparoscopic management of ureteropelvic junction obstruction in pediatric patients: a new approach to crossing vessels, crossing vein division, and upward transposition of the crossing artery. J Pediatr Urol. 2010; 6: 161-5.
- Jarrett TW, Chan DY, Charambura TC, Fugita O, Kavoussi LR. Laparoscopic pyeloplasty: the first 100 cases. J Urol2002; 167: 1253–6.
- Nguyen DH, Aliabadi H, Ercole CJ, Gonzalez R: Nonintubated Anderson-Hynes repair of ureteropelvic junction obstruction in 60 patients. J Urol. 1989; 142: 704-6.
- Persky L, Krause JR, Boltuch RL: Initial complications and late results in dismembered pyeloplasty. J Urol. 1977; 118: 162-5.
- Lallas CD, Pak RW, Pagnani C, Hubosky SG, Yanke BV, Keeley FX, et al.: The minimally invasive management of ureteropelvic junction obstruction in horseshoe kidneys. World J Urol. 2011; 29: 91-5.
- Preminger GM, Clayman RV, Nakada SY, Babayan RK, Albala DM, Fuchs GJ, et al.: A multicenter clinical trial investigating the use of a fluoroscopically controlled cutting balloon catheter for the management of ureteral and ureteropelvic junction obstruction. J Urol. 1997; 157: 1625-9.
- Shalhav AL, Giusti G, Elbahnasy AM, Hoenig DM, McDougall EM, Smith DS, et al.: Adult endopyelotomy: impact of etiology and antegrade versus retrograde approach on outcome. J Urol. 1998; 160: 685-9.
- O’Brien J, Buckley O, Doody O, Ward E, Persaud T, Torreggiani W. Imaging of horseshoe kidneys and their complications. J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol. 2008;52:216–26.
Corresponding Author
Priyabrata Das
RNRA-27, Rajiv Gandhi Nagar, Medical college PO, Trivandrum-695011
Phone no: 9497366747, Email: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.18535/jmscr/v5i8.89
