References
1. Anderson ER, Gates S. Techniques and materials for closure of the abdominal wall in caesarean section. Cochran Database Syst Rev. 2004: CD004663.
2. Antonella Cromi Md. PHD et al Blunt expansion of the low transverse uterine incision at caesarean delivery: a randomized comparison of 2 techniques. America Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, Sept 2008; Vol. 199: Pg. 292-294.
3. Bujold E, Bujold C, Hamilton EF, Hanel F, Gauthier RJ. The impact of a single layer or double layer closure on uterine rupture Am J Obstet. Gynecol. 2002; 186: 1326-30.
4. Sood Atul Kumar. Exteriorisation of uterus at caesarean section. J Obstet Gynaecol, July/Aug 2003; Vol. 53. No. 4: pg. 353-358.
5. Coutinho IC, Ronios de Amorin MM, Katz L, Bandeira de Feraz AA. Uterine exteriorisation compared with in situ repair at caesarean delivery: a randomized controlled trial. Jr of Obstet Gynecol. 2008 Jul; 112(1): 183.
6. Ezechi OC, Kalu BK, Njokanma FO, Mwokoro CA, Okeke GC, Uterine incision closure at caesarean section : a randomised comparative study of intra peritoneal closure and closure after temporary exteriorisation. West Afr J Med, 2005 Jan-March, 24(1): 41-3.
7. MA Wahab, P Karantzis. A randomized controlled study of uterine exteriorisation and repair at caesarean section. British Journal Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 1999; Vol. 106, Issue 9, pg 913-916.
8. Edi Osagie EC, Hopkins RE, Ogdo V et al Uterine exteriorisation at caesarean section infiuence on maternal morbidity. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1998; 105: 1070-1078.
9. Orji Fo, Olaleye AO, Loto OM, Ogunniyn SO. A randomized controlled trial of Uterine exteriorisation and non-exteriorisation at caesarean section. Aust NZJ Obstet Gynaecol, 2008 Dec; 48(6): 570-4.
10. Colin A Walsh, Stewart R Walsh. Extraabdominal v/s intraabdominal uterine repair at caesarean delivery: a meta analysis. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, June 2009; 200(6): 625e1-625e8.
11. Mughina Siddiqui MD et al. Complications of Exteriorisation versus insitu uterine repair at caesarean section Canadian Journal of Anaesthesia, 2004: 52(139): 730-1000.
12. Nafisi S. Influence of uterine exteriorisation versus insitu repair on post caesarean maternal pain: a randomized trial. Int J Obstet Anesth. 2007 April. 16 (2): 135-8.
13. JC Carvalho. Siddiqui M, Goldszmidt E, Fallah S. Complications of exteriorisation compared with in situ uterine repair at caesarean delivery under spinal anaesth-esia: a randomised controlled trial. Obstet. Gynaecol, 2007 Sept; 110(3):570-5.
14. Ozbay K et al. Exteriorized versus in-situ repair of the uterine incision at caesarean delivery: a randomized controlled trial. Clin Exp Obstet Gynecol. 2011;38(2):155-8.
15. Dr. K.K. Das et al. Comparative Study between Exteriorization of Uterus during Caesarean Section versus Intraperitoneal or in-Situ Repair. Sch. J. App. Med. Sci., October 2015; 3(7D):2724-2728.
16. Hershey DW, Quilligan EJ Uterine exteriorisation at caesarean section. Obstet Gynaecol. 1978; 52: 189-92.
17. Xiong Quing et al: Uterine repair with exteriorisation or insitu at caesarean section: A randomized controlled trial. Chinese Journal of Evidence Based Medicine, 2004; 09-25, pg 615-619.