Abstract
Background: Our study is to evaluate the prevalence of Allergic Fungal Rhinosinusitis in nasal polyposis in a tertiary care hospital and to compare the clinical features of chronic rhinosinusitis patients with nasal polyposis of fungal and non fungal aetiology.
Materials and Methods: The study was conducted in the Department of ENT and Department of Pathology, Medical College, Thiruvananthapuram during the period February 2009 to January 2010. 100 successive cases were taken into consideration. These were patients with nasal polyposis and chronic rhinosinusitis who were admitted to undergo surgery for the condition. The study design is a cross- sectional study.
Conclusion: AFRS in nasal polyposis is common in adults in the age group of 21-40. Nasal polyps without AFRS was also common in the above age group. The condition occurs more in males than in females with a male: female ratio of 1.75:1.The presenting complaints are the same as in chronic sinusitis. Nasal obstruction was the commonest complaint. The prevalence of allergic fungal sinusitis in nasal polyposis was found to be 11% in Medical College Hospital, Thiruvananthapuram.
Keywords: Allergic fungal rhinosinusitis, Nasal polyposis, chronicrhinosinusitis.
References
1. Vancil ME. A historical survey of treatment for nasal polyposis Laryngoscope. 1969; 79 : 435-445.
2. Bent JP, Kuhn FA. Diagnosis of Allergic Fungal Sinusitis. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1994,; 111: 580.
3. Drake-Lee AB. Nasal polyps. Scott Brown's Otolaryngology. 1997; 4 (Chapter 10): 1-14.
4. Allphin AL, Strauss M, Abdul Kanin FW. Allergic Fungal sinusitis: problem in diagnosis and treatment. Laryngoscope. 1991; 101 (8) : 815- 20.
5. Cody DT 2nd , Neel HN3rd, Ferreiro JA, Roberts GD, Allergic fungal sinusitis. The Mayo Clinic experience. Laryngoscope. 1994; 104 (9): 1074-9.
6. De Shazo RD, Swain RE, Diagnosistic criteria foe Allergic Fungal Sinusitis. J Allergy Clin Immunol.1995;6:24Blitzer A. Surgery of paranasal sinuses 2nd Edition.
7. Manning SC, Holman M. Further evidence for allergic pathophysiology in AFRS. Laryngoscope. 1998; 108 : 1485-96.
8. Kinsella JB, Bradfield JJ, Goulery WK et al. Allergic fungal sinusitis. Clinical Otolaryngology and Allied science. 1996; 21(5) : 389 - 392.
9. Waxman TE, Spector JG, Sale SR. Allergic Aspergillus Sinusitis: Concepts in diagnosis and treatment of a new clinical enitity, Laryngoscope 1987; 97:261-266Milosev B, Mahgoub ES, Abdel A. Primatyaspergillosis of the PNS in Sudan. A review of 17 cases. Br. J.surg.1969;56:132-37.
10. Torres C, Ro JY, El-Naggar AK et al. Allergic Fungal Sinusitis. A clinocopathological study of 16 cases. Human Pathology. 1996; 27(8) : 793-799.
11. Al Dousary SH. Allergic Fungal Sinusitis, Radiological and Microbiological features of 59 cases. Ann Saudi Med. 2008; 28:17-21.
12. Francis T. K. Ling, Stilianos E. Kountakis. Important Symptoms in patients undergoing Functional Endoscopic Sinus Surgery for Chronic Rhinosinusitis. Laryngoscope. June 2007; 117(6) : 1090-1093.
13. .Isekh K.R.: Makusidi M. Rhinosinusitis, a retrospective analysis of clinical pattern and outcome in North Western Nigeria. Annals of African Medicine. Jan 2010; 9(1): 20-26.
14. Wanlong, Shi Nong, Wang Yuanyuan, Liu Zheng, Cui Yonghua. Symptomatic Characteristics of Chronic Rhinosinusitis patients and Symptoms - Specific Outcomes after Endoscopic Sinus Surgery. Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology, Head and neck surgery. Sept 2009; 23 (17): 781-783.
15. Manning SC, Merkel M, Kriesel K et al. Computed Tomography and magnetic resonance diagnosis of Allergic Fungal sinusitis. Laryngoscope. 1997; 107 : 170.
16. Loidolt D, Ginter G. Mycologic analyses of house dust in patients with mycotic infection of the PNS and in healthy probands. Head & Neck Otolaryngology [Article in German]. 1988; 36(4) : 150-3
17. Laila M Telmesani. Prevalence of Allergic Fungal Sinusitis among patients with nasal polyps. Ann Saudi Med. 2009; 29(3) : 212-214.
18. Deshpande RV, Shukla A, Kirtane MV. Allergic Fungal Sinusitis: incidence and pathological features of seven cases. J Assoc Physicians India. 1995; 43(2): 98-100.
DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.18535/jmscr/v5i7.59
