Functional Outcome of Patients with Comminuted Femoral Shaft Fractures Treated By Interlocking Intra Medullary Nailing

Title: Functional Outcome of Patients with Comminuted Femoral Shaft Fractures Treated By Interlocking Intra Medullary Nailing

Authors: Dr Manoj Kumar R, Dr Jayachandran N, Dr Sabarisree M

DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.18535/jmscr/v5i7.06

Abstract

Background-Evaluation of functional outcome of those patients admitted with comminuted femoral shaft fractures treated by interlocking intra medullary nailing

Materials and Methods: Patients attending Govt Medical College, Thiruvananthapuram from June, 2004 to September, 2006 are selected. Open fractures are not included. Those cases with ipsilateral fractures in the lower limb in addition to comminuted femoral shaft fracture (like fracture of neck of femur, fracture of tibia, fracture of patella) are also excluded. Type II III and IV comminuted femoral shaft fractures (Winquist and Hansan classification) are taken for study.

Results: Excellent results are obtained in all cases of Type II comminuted towards of femoral shaft. Excellent to good results are obtained in Type III comminuted fractures.

Good to fair results are obtained in Type IV comminuted fractures.

Conclusion: Interlocking intra medullary nailing is a very good mode of treatment of comminuted fractures of the femoral shaft. Closed nailing and static locking is a technically demanding procedure. Risk of exposure to radiation is there. This method offers the possibility of maintenance of length, alignment and rotational, stability in comminuted fractures of the femoral shaft while preserving the biological environment of fracture healing.

Keywords: comminuted fracture of femur, intramedullary interlocking femoral nail.

References

1. Kenneth D. Johnson, MD: Mark Green berg, MD: Comminuted femoral shaft fractures: The Orthopaedic Clinics of North America volume 18/ Number 1 January 1987.

2. Winquist RA, Hansan ST, Clawson DK: closed intramedullary nailing of femoral fractures: A report of five Hundred and twenty cases. J Bone Joint Surg.66:529, 1984.

3. Closed interlocking nailing of femoral shaft fractures : Assessment of technical complications and functional outcome. J. Orthopaedic trauma 1993; 7(2): 118-22.

4. Reamed versus undreamed femoral nailing L A randomized prospective trial. M.G ciatworth et al. JBJS vol 80-B No.3 May 1998.

5. IM nailing : Case Reports: Berg, Engene E; Journal of Trauma 1994 May 36 (5) 749-751.

6. The effects of dynamisation on healing of femoral shaft fracture after interlocking nailing: J. of Trauma 1997 August; Dept. of

7. Orthopaedics; 43(2) 263-7 Chang Gung Memorial Hospital Taiwan, China.

8. Controversies in IM nailing of femoral shaft fractures. Wolinky eta I: JBJS (Am),2001;83: 1404-1415.

9. Ao/ASIF Instruments and implants A Technical manual; Second Edition, 1995.

10. Concepts in IM nailing: David seligson; distributed by Grunne and Stratton, New York, 1984.

11. Rockwood and Green's actures in Adults 6th Edition; Lippin cott Williams ofWilkins, Philadelphia, U.S.A.

12. Browneer BP pitfalls, errors and complications in use of locking nails Clin Orthop 1986 212: 192-208.

13. Johnson DWC, Parker b Committed femoral shaft fracture. JBJS (Am) 1984 66-a; 1222-35.

14. Kempf, Gross A, Beck G; Closed intramedullary nailing; its application to communited. Fractures of femoral shaft; Jbjs(am) 1985;67-1 709-20.

15. Kessler SB; Hall Feldt KKJ The effects of reaming and intrameduallry nailing In fracture healing. Clin orthop 1986 212; 18-25.

16. Rokannen; closed and open intramedullary nailing of femoral shaft fractures, a comparison with conservatively treated cases. JBJS(BR) 1969; 51-b;313-23.

17. Thoresen BO; interlocking nailing in femoral shaft fracture- a report of forty eight cases. JBJS (Am) 1985;67-a; 1313-20.

18. Winquist RA. Communited frature of femoral shaft treated by intrameduallry nailing. Orthop Clin. North Am 1980;11;6333-48.

19. Bucholz and Jones; current concepts review-fractures of femur shaft. JBJS;73a: 1566,1991.

20. Decision making errors with interlocking fixation : J Bone Joint surgery (Am) 1989 June 71(5) 790-1 Brumback RJ; Reilly-JP, Bathon G1.

21. Fracture healing with static interlocking fixation Brumback-RJ, Uwaige-ER, Lakatos-RP J Bone- Joint. Surg(Am) 1988 Dec.; 70 (10)1453-62.

22. Effects of static interlocking fixation, Brumback -R.J; Ethison J.S; Bursess-AR. J Bone-Joint surg (Am) 1992 Jan.74 (1). P 106-12.

23. Interlocking nailing. Dr. DD Thanna; 2nd Edition.

24. Comminuted and rotationally unstable fractures of the femur treated with an interlocking nail Wiss-DA Fleming-CH; Matta- JM. Clin-Orthop.1986 Nov (212( 35-47.

25. Interlocked nailing for treatment of segmented fractures of the femur. Wiss-DA; Brien-WW; Steson.WB J-Bone-Joint Surg (Am) 1990 June; 72(5); 724-8.

26. Biomechanical characteristics of interlocking femoral nails. Kyle RF; schaffhansen-J.M; Bechtold-JE Clin-Orthop. 1991 (June) 267 P1 69-73.

27. Closed interlocking nailing of femoral shaft fractures. Assessment of technical complications and Functional outcomes : Benirschke SK; Melder I; Henley MB; Chapman JR J Orthop Tramma 7(2), 1993 p (118-22).

28. AO manual of internal fixation, 111 edition, 1995.

Abstract

References

Corresponding Author

Call For Paper Volume 12 Issue 10 November 2024

JMSCR Menu

Impact Factor SJIF 2024: 7.892

Crossref - DOI

Editorial Policy

Frequency of Publication

Submission of Articles

Search

Abstract

Call For Paper Volume 12 Issue 10 November 2024

JMSCR Menu

Impact Factor SJIF 2024: 7.892

Crossref - DOI

Editorial Policy

Frequency of Publication

Submission of Articles