Role of Prophylactic Antibiotics to Prevent the Surgical Site Infections

Title: Role of Prophylactic Antibiotics to Prevent the Surgical Site Infections - A Study in A Tertiary Care Hospitals

Authors: Ilangovan Muthu Karuppaiah, Raj Kumar Krishnasamy

DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.18535/jmscr/v5i6.149

Abstract

Introduction: Surgical site infections are the third most common nosocomial infection, which constitute 38% of surgical infections. So, the selection of an appropriate antimicrobial agent depends on the identification of the most likely pathogens that are associated with a specific surgical procedure. The administration of antibiotic prophylaxis is considered to be optimal if it is given between 30 and 60 min before skin incision.

This study was performed to evaluate the use of perioperative prophylactic antibiotics in clean surgeries

Materials and Methods: The objective of the study was to compare the frequencies of patients developing postoperative wound infection in two groups of patients (study group and control group) undergoing clean elective general surgery operations. Patients in study group were given perioperative prophylactic antibiotics while patients in control group were not given perioperative prophylactic antibiotics.

It was an experimental prospective study. The study was conducted in general surgical ward in our unit in our hospital from June 2011 to June 2012. Only those patients undergoing clean elective general surgery operations were included.

Observation and Results: Out of 50 patients in study group, 26 patients underwent hernia surgery, 12 patients underwent neck surgeries, 7 patients underwent breast surgeries and remaining 5 patients underwent scrotal surgeries. Out of 50 patients in control group, 25 patients underwent hernia surgery, 11 patients underwent neck surgeries, 8 patients underwent breast surgeries and remaining 6 patients underwent scrotal surgeries.

Regarding age distribution, in study group, 18 patients were of age <40 years, 8 patients were >60 years and the remaining were between the age group of 40-60 years. In control group, 20 patients were of age <40 years, 3 patients were >60 years and the remaining 27 patients were between the age group of 40-60 years.

Regarding sex distribution of patients, 37 numbers of patients in study group were male and the remaining 13 were female in study group. In control group, 34 were male and 16 were female patients.

None of the patients either in study or control group developed organ or space infection. Patients developed only incisional surgical site infection which was either superficial or deep seated (redness, erythema, hematoma, purulent discharge). And the isolates from purulent discharge were mostly staphylococcus aureus (2 in study group and 3 in control group). One patient in each group developed Escherichia coli.

Conclusion: we come to a conclusion that for a clean an uncontaminated surgery, the use of antibiotics prophylactically does cause a significant reduction in the rate of surgical site infection Also literature, it is not established that prophylactic antibiotic for surgeries in general surgery reduce the infection rate as in contaminated and contaminated surgeries where its role is extension studied and its reduction in rate of surgical site infection is established.

Thus to conclude, according to this study performed prophylactic antibiotics, unless warranted, has no significant role clean elective surgeries.

Key Words: Infection, Prophylaxsis, Antibodies.

References

1. Koch A, Zippel R, Marusch F, Schmidt U, Gastinger I, Lippert H: Prospective multicenter study of antibiotic prophylaxis in operative treatment of appendicitis. Dig Surg. 2000, 17: 370-378. 10.1159/0000-18881.

2. Dellinger EP, Gross PA, Barrett TL, Krause PJ, Martone WJ, McGowan JE, Sweet RL, Wenzel RP: Quality standard for antimicrobial prophylaxis in surgical procedures. Infectious Diseases Society of America. Clin Infect Dis 1994,18:422-427.

3. Gyssens IC, Geerligs IE, Nannini-Bergman MG, Knape JT, Hekster YA, van der Meer JW: Optimizing the timing of antimicrobial prophylaxis in surgery: an intervention study. J Antimicrob Chemother. 1996, 38: 301-308.

4. Silver A, Eichorn A, Kral J, Pickett G, Barie P, Pryor V, Dearie MB: Timeliness and use of antibiotic prophylaxis in selected inpatient surgical procedures. The Antibiotic Prophylaxis Study Group. Am J Surg. 1996, 171: 548-552. 10.1016/S0002-9610(96)00036-0.

5. Bedouch P, Labarere J, Chirpaz E, Allenet B, Lepape A, Fourny M, Pavese P, Girardet P, Merloz P, Saragaglia D, Calop J, Francois P: Compliance with guidelines on antibiotic prophylaxis in total hip replacement surgery: results of a retrospective study of 416 patients in a teaching hospital. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2004, 25: 302-307. 10.1086/502396.

6. Pons-Busom M, Aguas-Compaired M, Delas J, Eguileor-Partearroyo B: Compliance with local guidelines for antibiotic prophylaxis in surgery. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2004, 25: 308-312. 10.1086/502397.

7. Dahms RA, Johnson EM, Statz CL, Lee JT, Dunn DL, Beilman GJ: Third-generation cephalosporins and vancomycin as risk factors for postoperative vancomycin-resistant enterococcus infection. Arch Surg. 1998, 133: 1343-1346. 10.1001/archsurg.133.12.1343.

8. Lau WY, Fan ST, Chu KW, Suen HC, Yiu TF, Wong KK: Randomized, prospective, and double-blind trial of new beta-lactams in the treatment of appendicitis. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1985, 28: 639-642.

9. Liberman MA, Greason KL, Frame S, Ragland JJ: Single-dose cefotetan or cefoxitin versus multiple-dose cefoxitin as prophylaxis in patients undergoing appendectomy for acute nonperforated appendicitis. J Am Coll Surg. 1995, 180: 77-80.

10. Andersen BR, Kallehave FL, Andersen HK: Antibiotics versus placebo for prevention of postoperative infection after appendicectomy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2005, 3: CD001439-

11. National Nosocomial Infections Surveillance (NNIS) System Report, data summary from January 1992 through June 2004, issued October 2004. Am J Infect Control. 2004, 32: 470-485. 10.1016/j.ajic.2004.10.001.

12. Hale DA, Molloy M, Pearl RH, Schutt DC, Jaques DP: Appendectomy: a contemporary appraisal. Ann Surg. 1997, 225: 252-261. 10.1097/00000658-199703000-00003.

13. Soderquist-Elinder C, Hirsch K, Bergdahl S, Rutqvist J, Frenckner B: Prophylactic antibiotics in uncomplicated appendicitis during childhood – a prospective randomised study. Eur J Pediatr Surg. 1995, 5: 282-285.

14. Nguyen BL, Raynor S, Thompson JS: Selective versus routine antibiotic use in acute appendicitis. Am Surg. 1992, 58: 280-283

15. Gorecki P, Schein M, Rucinski JC, Wise L: Antibiotic administration in patients undergoing common surgical procedures in a community teaching hospital: the chaos continues. World J Surg. 1999, 23: 429-432. 10.1007/PL00012319.

16. Owens WD, Felts JA, Spitznagel EL: ASA physical status classifications: a study of consistency of ratings. Anesthesiology. 1978, 49: 239-243.

17. Culver DH, Horan TC, Gaynes RP, Martone WJ, Jarvis WR, Emori TG, Banerjee SN, Edwards JR, Tolson JS, Henderson TS, Hughes JM, the National Nosocomial Infections Surveillance System, Atlanta, Georgia: Surgical wound infection rates by wound class, operative procedure, and patient risk index. National Nosocomial Infections Surveillance System. Am J Med. 1991, 91 (3B): 152S-157S. 10.1016/0002-9343(91)90361-Z.

18. Razavi SM, Ibrahimpoor M, Sabouri KA, Jafarian A: Abdominal surgical site infections: incidence and risk factors at an Iranian teaching hospital. BMC Surg. 2005, 5: 2-10.1186/1471-2482-5-2.

19. Hernandez K, Ramos E, Seas C, Henostroza G, Gotuzzo E: Incidence of and risk factors for surgical-site infections in a Peruvian hospital. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2005, 26: 473-477. 10.1086/502570.

20. Kaye KS, Schmit K, Pieper C, Sloane R, Caughlan KF, Sexton DJ, Schmader KE: The effect of increasing age on the risk of surgical site infection. J Infect Dis. 2005, 191: 1056-1062. 10.1086/428626.

21. Sohn AH, Parvez FM, Vu T, Hai HH, Bich NN, Le Thu TA, Le Hoa TT, Thanh NH, Viet TV, Archibald LK, Banerjee SN, Jarvis WR: Prevalence of surgical-site infections and patterns of antimicrobial use in a large tertiary-care hospital in Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2002, 23: 382-387. 10.1086/502070.

22. Tonz M, Schmid P, Kaiser G: Antibiotic prophylaxis for appendectomy in children: critical appraisal. World J Surg. 2000, 24: 995-998. 10.1007/s002680010161.

23. Charalambous C, Tryfonidis M, Swindell R, Lipsett AP: When should old therapies be abandoned? A modern look at old studies on topical ampicillin. J Infect. 2003, 47: 203-209. 10.1016/S0163-4453(03)00071-9.

24. Lau WY, Fan ST, Chu KW, Yip WC, Yiu TF, Yeung C, Wong KK: Cefoxitin versus gentamicin and metronidazole in prevention of post-appendicectomy sepsis: a randomized, prospective trial. J Antim-icrob Chemother. 1986, 18: 613-619.

25. al Dhohayan A, al Sebayl M, Shibl A, al Eshalwy S, Kattan K, al Saleh M: Comparative study of augmentin versus metronidazole/gentamicin in the preve-ntion of infections after appendicectomy. Eur Surg Res. 1993, 25: 60-64.

26. Horan TC, Gaynes RP, Martone WJ, Jarvis WR, Emori TG: CDC definitions of nosocomial surgical site infections, 1992: a modification of CDC definitions of surgical wound infections. Am J Infect Control. 1992, 20: 271-274. 10.1016/S0196-6553(05)80201-9.

27. ASHP Therapeutic Guidelines on Antimicrobial Prophylaxis in Surgery: American Society of Health-System Pharmacists. Am J Health Syst Pharm. 1999, 56: 1839-1888.

28. Mangram AJ, Horan TC, Pearson ML, Silver LC, Jarvis WR: Guideline for Prevention of Surgical Site Infection, 1999. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) Hospital Infection Control Practices Advisory Committee. Am J Infect Control. 1999, 27: 97-132. 10.1016/S0196-6553(99)70088-X.

29. Taylor E, Berjis A, Bosch T, Hoehne F, Ozaeta M: The efficacy of postoperative oral antibiotics in appendicitis: a randomized prospective double-blinded study. Am Surg. 2004, 70: 858-862.

30. Mui LM, Ng CS, Wong SK, Lam YH, Fung TM, Fok KL, Chung SS, Ng EK: Optimum duration of prophylactic antibiotics in acute non-perforated appendicitis. ANZ J Surg. 2005, 75: 425-428. 10.1111/j.1445-2197.2005.03397

31. Dellinger EP, Gross PA, Barrett TL, et al. . Quality standard for antimicrobial prophylaxis in surgical procedures, Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol , 1994, vol. 15 (pg. 182-8)

32. Scottish Intercollegiate Network Guidelines, Antibiotic prophylaxis in surgery, 2001 Available at: http://www.sign.ac.uk/guidelines/fulltext/45/index.html. Accessed 20 June 2006

33. Bratzler DW, Houck PM, Surgical Infection Prevention Guidelines Writers Workgroup. Antimicrobial prophylaxis for surgery: an advisory statement from the National Surgical Infection Prevention Project, Clin Infect Dis , 2004, vol. 38 (pg. 1706-15)

34. Van Kasteren ME, Gyssens IC, Kullberg BJ, Bruining HA, Stobberingh EE, Goris RJ. Optimizing antibiotics policy in the Netherlands. V. SWAB guidelines for perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis. Working Party on Antibiotic Policies (SWAB), Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd , 2000, vol. 144 (pg. 2049-55)

35. de Boer AS, Geubbels EL, Wille J, Mintjes-de Groot AJ. Risk assessment for surgical site infections following total hip and total knee prostheses, J Chemother , 2001, vol. 13 Spec 1(pg. 42-7)

Abstract

References

Corresponding Author

Call For Paper Volume 12 Issue 10 November 2024

JMSCR Menu

Impact Factor SJIF 2024: 7.892

Crossref - DOI

Editorial Policy

Frequency of Publication

Submission of Articles

Search

Abstract

Call For Paper Volume 12 Issue 10 November 2024

JMSCR Menu

Impact Factor SJIF 2024: 7.892

Crossref - DOI

Editorial Policy

Frequency of Publication

Submission of Articles