Abstract
Antral follicle count (AFC) has been labeled as the most accurate biomarker to assess female fecundity. Unfortunately, no baseline Indian data exists, and we continue using surrogate values from the Western literature (inferred from studies on women, grossly different than Indian women in morphology and genetic makeup).
Aims: To establish the role of AFC as a function of ovarian reserve in fertility‑proven and in subfertile Indian women. To establish baseline cut‑off AFC values for Indian women.
Materials and Methods: Thirty patients undergoing workup for infertility were included and compared to equal number of controls (women with proven fertility). The basal ovarian volume and AFC were measured by endovaginal. USG the relevant clinical data and hormonal assays were charted for every patient.
Statistical Analysis Used: SPSS platform was used to perform the Student’s t‑test and Mann-Whitney U‑test for intergroup comparisons. Correlations were determined by Pearson’s ranked correlation coefficient.
Results: Regression analysis revealed the highest correlation of AFC and age in fertile and infertile patients with difference in mean AFC of both the groups. Comparison of the data recorded for cases and controls showed no significant difference in the mean ovarian volume.
Conclusions: AFC has the closest association with chronological age in normal and infertile Indian women. The same is lower in infertile women than in matched controls. Baseline and cut‑off values in Indian women are lower than that mentioned in the Western literature.
Key words: Antral follicle count; infertility; ovarian reserve.
References
1. Aubuchon M, Burney RO, Schust DJ, Yao MW. Infertility and assisted reproductive technology. In: Berek JS, Berek DL editors. Berek and Novak’s Gynecology, 15th ed. New Delhi: Wolters Kluwer India Pvt Ltd; 2012. p. 1133‑88.
2. Broekmans FJ, Faddy MJ, Scheffer G, te Velde ER. Antral follicle counts are related to age at natural fertility loss and age at menopause. Menopause 2004;11:607‑14.
3. Scheffer GJ, Broekmans FJ, Looman CW, Blankenstein M, Fauser BC, de Jong FH, et al. The number of antral follicles in normal women with proven fertility is the best reflection of reproductive age. Hum Reprod 2003;18:700‑6.
4. LassA, Skull J, McVeigh E, Margara R, Winston RM. Measurement of ovarian volume by transvaginal sonography before ovulation induction with human menopausal gonadotrophin for in‑vitro fertilization can predict poor response. Hum Reprod 1997;12:294‑7.
5. Tomas C, Nuojua‑Huttunen S, Martikainen H. Pretreatment transvaginal ultrasound examination predicts ovarian responsiveness to gonadotropins in in‑vitro fertilization. Hum Reprod 1997;12:220‑3.
6. Ng EH, Yeung WS, Fong DY, Ho PC. Effects of age on hormonal and ultrasound markers of ovarian reserve in Chinese women with proven fertility. Hum Reprod 2003;18:2169‑74.
7. Bancsi LF, Broekmans FJ, Eijkemans MJ, de Jong FH, Habbema JD, te Velde ER. Predictors of poor ovarian response in in vitro fertilization: A prospective study comparing basal markers of ovarian reserve. Fertil Steril 2002;77:328‑36.
8. Pache TD, Wladimiroff JW, de Jong FH, Hop WC, Fauser BC. Growth patterns of nondominant ovarian follicles during the normal menstrual cycle. Fertil Steril 1990;54:638‑42.
9. van Santbrink EJ, Hop WC, van Dessel TJ, de Jong FH, Fauser BC. Decremental follicle‑stimulating hormone and dominant follicle development during the normal menstrual cycle. Fertil Steril 1995;64:37‑43.
10. Syrop CH, Willhoite A, Van Voorhis BJ. Ovarian volume: A novel outcome predictor for assisted reproduction. Fertil Steril 1995;64:1167‑71.
11. Block E. Quantitative morphological investigations of the follicular system in women; variations at different ages. Acta Anat (Basel) 1952;14:108‑23.
12. Sills ES, Alper MM, Walsh AP. Ovarian reserve screening in infertility: Practical applications and theoretical directions for research. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2009;146:30‑6.
13. Rosen MP, Johnstone E, Addauan‑Andersen C, Cedars MI. A lower AFC is Associated with Infertility. Fertil Steril 2011;95:1950‑4.
14. Almog B, Shehata F, Shalom‑Paz E, Tan SL, Tulandi T. Age‑related normogram for antral follicle count: McGill reference guide. Fertil Steril 2010;95:663‑6.
15. Faddy MJ, Gosden RG, Gougeon A, Richardson SJ, Nelson JF. Accelerated disappearance of ovarian follicles in mid‑life: Implications for forecasting menopause. Hum Reprod 1992;7:1342‑6.
16. Muttukrishna S, McGarrigle H, Wakim R, Khadum I, Ranieri DM, Serhal P. Antral follicle count, anti‑Müllerian hormone and inhibin B: Predictors of ovarian response in assisted reproductive technology? BJOG 2005;112:1384‑90.
17. Maseelall PB, Hernandez‑Rey AE, Oh C, Maagdenberg T, McCulloh DH, McGovern PG. Antral follicle count is a significant predictor of livebirth in in vitro fertilization cycles. Fertil Steril 2009;91:1595‑7.
18. Hsu A, Arny M, Knee AB, Bell C, Cook E, Novak AL, et al. Antral follicle count in clinical practice: Analyzing clinical relevance. Fertil Steril 2011;95:474‑9.
DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.18535/jmscr/v5i1.160
