Title: Obstructed Labor at a Tertiary Hospital in Nigeria: A Six-Year Review

Authors: Dr Bernard. O. Ewuoso, Dr Olalekan. D Awonuga,  Dr Taofeek. A. Ogunfunmilayo,  Dr Adesoji. S. Adebayo, Dr Olaide. R. Adenaya, Dr Olufemi. M Badmus

 DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.18535/jmscr/v12i08.08

Abstract

Introduction: Unlike most developed countries, obstructed labor with a dead fetus is still a reality in many developing countries, and it is a well-known cause of maternal and perinatal morbidity and mortality.

Objective: To highlight the characteristics of patients presenting with obstructed labor at a tertiary hospital and determine fetomaternal outcomes.

Methodology: A retrospective descriptive study of 45 cases of obstructed labor that were managed in a tertiary hospital from January 2009 to December 2014. Relevant information was extracted from patients’ case files, and the data obtained were analyzed.

Results: Obstructed labor constituted 0.75% of all deliveries. All patients were referred in, and thirty (2/3) of them were nulliparous, while 25 (55.6%) were between the ages of 16 and 25. Forty-one (91.1%) of the patients were delivered by emergency caesarean section, while four patients had exploratory laparotomy with uterine repair and bilateral tubal ligation. Thirty-eight (84.5%) of the babies weighed between 2.6-4kg and five (11.1%) weighed more than 4kg. Most of the patients, 91.1%, had prolonged hospital stay with 25% staying over 3 weeks postpartum before being discharged. Eight (17.8%) suffered severe birth asphyxia, and there were five perinatal and two maternal mortalities. The commonest complication was puerperal sepsis.

Conclusion: The study showed obstructed labor remains a cause of perinatal and maternal morbidity and mortality. Effective use of partographs in the peripheral centers, where all the women came from, would ensure early referral before labor became obstructed.

References

  1. Obed SA. Obstructed labor. In: Kwawukume EY, Emuveyan EE,(Eds). Comprehensive Obstetric in the tropics. Asante and Hilttescher, Dansoman, Accra.2002:77-85.
  2. Rahimi S. Obstetric Fistula in a Global Context. In: Shirazian T, Gertz E, (Eds). Around the globe for woman’s health. A practical guide for the health care provider. Springer Science and Business Media, New York. 2013:52-81.
  3. Esuen MI, Oronsaye AU. Obstructed labor. A four year survey at University of Benin Teaching Hospital, Benin City. J. Obstet. Gynaecol.1981;1:81-85.
  4. Konje JC. Nutrition and Obstructed Labor. Am J Clin Nutr.2000; 72(1):291-297.
  5. World Health Organization. Reduction of Mortality. A joint WHO/UNFPA/UNICEF/WORLD BANK STATEMENT 1999.
  6. Melah GS, EL-Nafaty AU, Massa AA, Audu BM. Obstructed labor: a public health problem in Gombe, Gombe State, Nigeria. J Obstet Gynaecol. 23(4): 2003;pp.369-73.
  7. Beazley J M. Dystocia Caused by passage or passenger. In: Whitfield CR (ED) Dewhurst’s textbook of obstetrics and gynecology for Postgraduate 5th edition, Blackwell Scientific Publications, Oxford. 1995;333-345
  8. Orhue AAE. Problem of labor. In: Agboola A, (ED). Textbook of Obstetrics and Gynaecology for Medical Students. Second edition Heinemann Educational Books, Ibadan.2006:442-471.
  9. Hudson CN. Obstructed Labor and its sequelae. In: Lawson JB, Harrison KA and Bergstrom S(Eds). Maternity Care in Developing Countries. RCOG Press, London.2001;201-214.
  10. Fantu S, Segni H and Alemseged F. Incidence, causes and outcome of obstructed labor in Jimma University Specialized Hospital. Ethiop J Health Sci.2010;20(3): 145-151
  11. Shaikh S, Shaikh AH, Shaikh SAH, Isran B. Frequency of obstructed labor in teenage pregnancy. NJOG.2012;7(3):37-40.
  12. Jeremiah I, Nwagwu V. The pattern of obstructed labor among parturients in a tertiary hospital in southern Nigeria. AJOL.2012. Vol 6 No 1.
  13. Dutta D.C. Injuries to the birth canal. In: Hiralal K, (Ed). C. Dutta’s textbook of obstetrics.7th edition. New central book agency, Delhi. 2013; 28:426.

Corresponding Author

Dr Bernard. O. Ewuoso