Title: Clinicopathological Features and Outcome of Varicose Veins -  A Prospective Study

Authors: Dr Aravindhan.M, Dr Kabalimurthy.J, Dr Sundar Prakash.S, Dr Jospin Amala A, Dr Kamal Kumar, Dr Mary Prescilla

 DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.18535/jmscr/v8i11.06

Abstract

Background: The study was conducted to study the various etiological, anatomical and pathological factors for varicose veins. To study the clinical patterns of varicose veins and comparing their occurrence with etiological factors and to study the relevance of various investigative modalities for varicose veins.

Materials and Methods: This study was conducted in 52 patients diagnosed with varicose veins who were admitted in the department of General Surgery, Rajah Muthiah Medical College from October 2018 to September 2020.

Results: Out of 52 patients, those who presented with C4 classification are highest. Primary etiology was much common than secondary. Pathologically, reflux type was common then obstructive type. Anatomically GSV and perforator combination was more common.

Conclusion: In this study, Clinical presentations in varicose veins ranged from mild to severe varicosities, with ulcer and lipodermatosclerosis being the most severe forms. At present, Duplex ultrasound scanning is the most reliable investigative tool in making diagnosis of varicose veins. Treatment includes conservative management, sclerotherapy and surgery. Surgical intervention has been revolutionized by the development of endovenous techniques like radiofrequency abalation, laserabalation, foamsclerotherapy and subfacial endoscopic perforator surgery.

Keywords: Varicose veins, GSV, perforator, Doppler, trendelenberg.

References

  1. De Takatas G. Varicose veins and their sequelae. JAMA 1929; 92(10):775-783. doi:10.1001/jama.1929.02700360013005Masuda E.M., Kistner R.L., Prospective comparision of Duplex scanning and descending venography in assessment of venous in sufficiency. Am J Surg. 1992 Sep; 164(3):254-9.
  2. Shami S.K., Sarin S, Cheatle T.R., Scurr J.H., Coleridge Smith P.D., “Venous ulcers and the superficial system”. Journal of Vascular Surgery.1993:17:487-490.
  3. Bergam JJ, Yao JST. Edition Surgery of Veins. New York: Grune and Stratton, 1985.
  4. Bergan JJ, Yao JST. Venous Disorder. Phiiladelphia: W.B. Saunders, 1991.
  5. Bradybury AW, Murie JA, Ruckley CV. Role of leucocyte in the pathogenesis of vascular disease. Br. J Surg, 1993:8: 1503-12.
  6. Browse NZ, Burnand KG, and Lea Thomas M. Diseases of the Veins: Pathology, diagnosis and treatment. London: Arnold, 1988
  7. Dodd H, Cockett FB, The pathology and surgery of the veins of the lower limbs. Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone, 1976.
  8. David J. Tibbs Venous disorders, Oxford Textbook of Surgery.
  9. Gardener AMN, Fox RH. The return of Blood to Heart : Venous pumps in Health and Disease, London :john Libbey, 1989
  10. John H. Scurr, Venous Disorder, Bailey and Love’s Short Practice of Surgery.
  11. Lea Thomas M. Phelebography of lower limbs. Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone, 1982.
  12. Negus D. Leg Ulcers. Oxford: Butterworth – Heinemann Ltd., 1991.
  13. Nicolaides AN, Christopoulors D, Vasdekis S. Progress in the investigations of chronic venous insufficiency. Ann Vasc Surg, 1989:3:278-92.
  14. Tibbs DJ. Varicose veins and related disorders. Oxford: Butterworth Heinemann Ltd., 1992.
  15. Hanahan LM, Araki CT, Rodriguez AA. Et al: Distribution of valvular incompetence in patients with venous stasis ulceration. J Vasc Surg 13:805-512, 1991.
  16. Shami SK, Sarin S, Cheatle TR, et al: Venous ulcers and the superficial venous system. J Vasc Surg 17:487 – 490, 1993.
  17. Walsh JC, Bergen JJ, Beeman S, et al : Femoral venous reflux abolished by greater saphenous vein stripping. Ann Vasc Surg 8:566-570, 1994.

Corresponding Author

Dr Aravindhan.M

Junior Resident, Department of General Surgery, Rajah Muthiah Medical college and Hospital, Annamalai University, Tamil Nadu, India