Details
Category: Volume 08 Issue 07 July 2020
Hits: 971

Title: A Parallel Prospective Open Label Comparative study between the Characteristics of Unilateral Spinal and Paravertebral Blockade in Patients Undergoing Inguinal herniorrhaphy

Authors: Dr Purbasha Roy MBBS, MD, Dr Amartya Das MBBS, MD, DNB, IDRA

 DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.18535/jmscr/v8i7.88

Abstract

Introduction: Inguinal hernia repair can be performed under satisfactory anaesthetic conditions using general, regional and peripheral nerve block anaesthesia. The paravertebral block, being segmental in nature, provides some advantages regarding haemodynamic stability, early ambulation and prolonged duration of analgesia and may be a viable alternative to unilateral spinal anaesthesia.

Methods: Seventy consenting male patients aged between 18-65 years, of ASA Grade I & II status, undergoing elective unilateral inguinal hernia repair were randomised into two groups, 35 patients each to receive  either the four segment  (T10-L1) paravertebral  block (Group P) or  unilateral  spinal anaesthesia (Group S) respectively. There after intra-operative and post-operative parameters were recorded and compared between these two groups using standardized statistical methods.

Results: Patients in Group P had lesser rescue analgesic requirement, longer duration of sensory block, no motor block leading to early ambulation, better haemodynamic stability, lesser side effects than patients in Group S. However the block performance time and time to onset of anaesthesia was significantly higher in Group P.

Conclusion: Paravertebral block is advantageous in respect to post operative analgesia and early ambulation compared to unilateral spinal anaesthesia.

References

  1. Baskerville PA, Jarret PEM. Day case inguinal hernia. Ann R Coll Surg Engl.1983;65:224–5.
  2. Young DV. Comparison of local, spinal and general anaesthesia for inguinal hernia repair. Am J Surg.1987;153:560-3.
  3. J. Wood, J.W. Lloyd, R.E.S. Bullingham, B.J. Britton, D.R.A. Finch. Postoperative analgesia for day-case herniorrhaphy patients. Anaesthesia.1981; 36: 603-610.
  4. Oosterlee J, Dudley Haf.Surgery in outpatients. British Medical Journal. 1979; 2: 1459-60.
  5. Cwik J. Postoperative considerations of neuraxial anesthesia. Anesthesiol Clin. 2012;30:433-43.
  6. Aklaya F. Postoperative complications and nausea vomiting. Turkiye Klinikleri J Anest Reanim-Special Topics.2008; 1:112-6.
  7. Isil CT, Cinar ASO, Oba S, Isil RG. Comparison of spinal anaesthesia and paravertebral block in unilateral inguinal hernia repair. Turk J Anaesthesiol Reanim. 2014; 42: 257-263.
  8. Sinha SK, Brahmchari Y, Kaur M, Jain A.The comparative evaluation of safety and efficacy of  unilateral  paravertebral  block  with  conventional  spinal  anesthesia  for  inguinal hernia repair. Indian J Anaesth. 2016; 60: 499-505.
  9. Mishra M, Mishra SP, Singh SP. Comparison of spinal with paravertebral block for elective open inguinal hernia repair. World J Med Res. 2016;5:1–6.
  10. Ozgun H, Kurt MN, Kurt I, Cevikel MH. Comparison of local, spinal and general anesthesia for inguinal herniorrhaphy. Eur J Surg. 2002;168:455-9.
  11. Yilmazlar A, Bilgel H, Donmez C, Guney A, Yilmazlat T, Tokat O. Comparison of ilioinguinal-iliohypogastric nerve block versus spinal anesthesia for inguinal herniorrhaphy. South Med J. 2006; 99:48-51.
  12. Gupta A, Axelsson K, Thörn SE, Matthiessen P, Larsson LG, Holmström B et al. Low dose bupivacaine plus fentanyl for spinal anesthesia during ambulatory inguinal herniorrhaphy: a comparison between 6 mg and 7.5 mg of bupivacaine. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2003;47:13-9.
  13. Kehlet H, Dahl JB. Spinal anesthesia for inguinal hernia repair? Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2003; 47:1-2.
  14. Salinas FV, Liu SS. Spinal anesthesia: Local anesthetics and adjuncts in the ambulatory setting. Clin Anaesthesiol. 2001; 16:195-210.
  15. Mulroy MF: Ambulatory surgery. A practical approach to regional anaesthesia 4th ed. Mulroy MF, Bernards CM, McDonald SB, Salians FV. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, a Wolters Kluwer. 2009; 311.
  16. Weltz CR, Klein SM, Arbo JE, Greengrass RA. Paravertebral block anesthesia for inguinal hernia repair. World J Surg. 2003; 27: 425-9.
  17. Lonnqvist P.A. Paravertebral blockade: Failure rate and complications. Anaesthesia. 1995; 50: 813-15
  18. Wassef M.R, Randazzo T, Ward W. The paravertebral nerve root block for inguinal herniorraphy-a comparison with the field block approach. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 1998; 23(5):451-6
  19. Klein S, Pietrobon R, Nielsen K. Paravertebral somatic nerve block compared with peripheral nerve block for outpatient inguinal herniorrhaphy. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2002; 27: 476-80
  20. Hadzic A, Kerimoglu B, Loreio D, Karaca PE, Claudio RE, Yufa M, et al. Paravertebral blocks provide superior same-day recovery over general anesthesia for patients undergoing inguinal hernia repair. Anesth Analg. 2006; 102: 1076-81.
  21. Naja ZM, Raf M, Rajab M, Daoud N, Ziade FM, Tannir MA, Lonnqvist PA. A comparison of nerve stimulator guided paravertebral block and ilio-inguinal nerve block for analgesia after inguinal herniorrhaphy in children. Anaesth. 2006; 61: 1064-1068.

Corresponding Author

Dr Amartya Das MBBS, MD, DNB, IDRA

Junior Consultant, Dept of Anaesthesiology, ILS Hospitals, Dum Dum