Title: Comparison between the Efficacy of Conservative Management and Ultrasound Guided Pigtail Catheter Drainage of Uncomplicated Amoebic Liver Abscess

Authors: Dr K Phani Jotsna, Dr Aachi. Srinivas, Dr Vinodh Varada

 DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.18535/jmscr/v8i7.46

Abstract

Liver abscess is the most common condition associated with right upper quadrant pain and fever. It is a common disease of the tropical region. Liver abscess is broadly classified into the amoebic and pyogenic liver abscess. Colonic amoebae are mainly responsible for the development of an abscess. The uncomplicated amoebic liver abscess has been managed conservatively with amoebicidal and antibiotics alone or in combination with ultrasound-guided pigtail catheter or pigtail catheter alone too. According to the review of literature, the smaller the amoebic liver abscess successful was the conservative management, whereas the larger sized abscess or complicated abscess  (ruptured, pressure effect)required either open or closed drainage. An objective criterion for the management of uncomplicated liver abscess is established in the present study. Through this study, it is possible t know the mode of treatment to a particular patient with reference to the severity of the disease. 40 patients admitted from June 2018 to January 2020 with uncomplicated amoebic liver abscess were included in the present study.they were divided into two study groups 1) conservatively managed 2) PCD (pigtail catheter drainage). The success rate was measured in terms of clinical improvement, reduction of abscess cavity, need for the redo procedure. In the present study, it has been observed that the resolution of uncomplicated amoebic liver abscess is faster and easier with pigtail catheter drainage than who were managed conservatively. From this study, we can conclude that the pigtail catheter is a better modality of treatment for abscess measuring >6cm  and conservative management for those measuring <6cm

Keywords: Uncomplicated liver abscess, antibiotic therapy, USG guided drainage –pigtail catheter.

References

  1. Seeto RK, Rockey DC. Pyogenic liver ab Changes in etiology, management, and outcome. Medicine (Baltimore). 1996;75(2):99-113.
  2. Krige JE, Beckingham IJ. ABC of diseases of liver, pancreas and biliary system: liver abscesses and hydatid disease. BMJ 2001;322(7285):53
  3. Farges O, Leese T, Bismuth H. Pyogenic liver abscess: an improvement in prognosis Br J Surg. 1988;75:862-5        
  4. Barbour G. L. and Juniper K. A clinical comparison of amebic and pyogenic abscess of the liver in sixty- six patients. Am J Surg. 1972;53:323-34
  5. Ochsner A, DeBakey Amebic hepatitis and abscess (an analysis of 181  cases with review of literature).  Surgery 1943; 13: 612-49. Petri Jr WA,  Singh U. State of the art clinical article- Diagnosis and Management of Amoebiasis. Clin Infect Dis 1999; 29: 1117-25.
  6. Salles MJ, Moraes AL, salles CM. Hepatic amebiasis. Braz  J Infect Dis 2003;7:1-2
  7. Shabot MJ, Patterson M. Amebic liver abscess: 1966-1976. Dig Dis 1978;23:110-18.
  8. Petri Jr WA, Singh U. State of the art clinic article- Diagnosis and Management of Amoebiasis. Clin Infect Dis 1999; 29:1117-25.
  9. Gandhi BM, Irshad M, Acharya SK, Tandon BN. Amebic liver abscess and Circulating immune complexes of Entamoeba Histolytica portiens . Am J Trop Med hyg 1988; 39:440-44.
  10. Lodhi S, Sarwari AR, Muzamil M, Salam A, Smego A, Smego RA. Features distinguishing amoebic from pyogenic liver abscesses: a review of 577 adult cases. Trop Med Int Health 2004;9: 718-23.
  11. Mathur S, Gehlot SR, Mohta A, Bhargava N. Clinical profile of amoebic liver abscess. J Ind Acad Clin Med 2002; 3: 367-73.
  12. Khanna S, Chaudhary O, Kumar A, Vij JC Experience with aspiration in amoebic liver abscess. Report from an endemic area. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 2005;24: 428-30
  13. Sharma MP, Dasarathy S, Verma N, saksena S, Shukla KD. ProGnostic markers in Amebic liver abscess: a prospective study Am J Gastroenterol 1996; 91: 2584- 88.
  14. Lamont NM, Pooler NR. Hepatic amoebiasis.A study of 250 cases. Quart J Med New Ser 1958; 27: 389-441.
  15. Ramachandran S, Goontiallke HD, Induruwa PAC. Syndromes in amoebic liver Abscess. Br J Surg 1976; 63:220-25
  16. Blessmann J, Binh Duy Hung Manh 0, Tannich E, Burchard G. Treatment of Amoebic liver abscess with metronidazole alone or in combination with ultrasound Guided needle aspiration: a comparative, prospective, and randomized study.Trop Med Int Heaith 2003; 8: 1030-34.
  17. Allan Van JR, Katz OM, Johnson BM, Laine AL, Liu Y, Ralls WP. Uncomplicated amebic liver abscess: a prospective evaluation of percutaneous therapeutic aspiration. Radiology 1992; 183: 827-30.
  18. Kapadia S, Duttaroy D, Ghodgaonkar p, Maru S. Percutaneous catheter drainage of liver abscesses.Indian J Surgery 2002; 64: 516-19.
  19. Zafar A, Ahmed S. Amoebic liver abscess; a comparative study of needle aspiration versus conservative management. J Ayub Med Coli Abbottabad 2002;14:10-12
  20. Tsai Ho S. Experiences in the therapy of amebic liver abscess on Taiwan. Am J Trap Med Hyg 1973; 22: 24-9.

Corresponding Author

Dr K.Phani Jotsna

Postgraduate, Department of General Surgery, GEMS, Srikakulam