Title: Anthropometric study of hip joint characteristics in the Kashmir valley with Computed Tomography

Authors: Muhammad bin Abdul Hamid, Nadia Rashid, Omar Khursheed

 DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.18535/jmscr/v8i7.03

Abstract

Background: An understanding of anthropometric measurements of the hip joint, in any given population has important clinical and logistical implications in the orthopaedic setting. A study of this nature, utilizing computed tomography, has not been conducted on the Kashmiri population, and this study aims to bridge that gap.

Materials and Methods: The study evaluated 80 individuals, with otherwise normal hips to be included in the study. All of these patients had CT of the abdomen/pelvis done for unrelated reasons, and anthropometric data for the hip was obtained from examining these sections. Parameters studied were the CE angle. acetabular angle, acetabular version, neck shaft angle, and the vertical diameter of the femoral head.

Results: The following were the mean values obtained: Acetabular angle: 39.2°, acetabular version: 18.8°, CE angle (of Wiberg): 33.9°, neck-shaft angle: 139.5°, vertical femoral head height: 45.3mm

Conclusion: The hip joint parameters measured in our study were comparable to other studies conducted on Indian, as well as western population. The neck shaft angle in our study was higher than that studied in the western population.

References

  1. Tönnis D. Normal values of the hip joint for the evaluation of X-rays in children and adults. Clin Orthop. 1976 Sep; (119): 39–47.
  2. Lequesne M, Malghem J, Dion E. The normal hip joint space: variations in width, shape, and architecture on 223 pelvic radiographs. Ann Rheum Dis. 2004 Sep; 63(9):1145–51.
  3. WIBERG G. Studies on dysplastic acetabula and congenital subluxation of the hip joint. Acta Chir Scand [Internet]. 1939 [cited 2020 Jun 16]; 83(58). Available from: https://ci.nii.ac.jp/naid/10010933620/
  4. Murray DW. The definition and measurement of acetabular orientation. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1993 Mar;75(2):228–32.
  5. Saikia K, Bhuyan S, Rongphar R. Anthropometric study of the hip joint in Northeastern region population with computed tomography scan. Indian J Orthop. 2008;42(3):260–6.
  6. Khan DrJM, Banday Dr MI, Muzaffar Dr J. A study of measurement of acetabular diameter radiologically in northern Indian population of Jammu region. Int J Orthop Sci. 2018 Jul 1;4(3.1):78–81.
  7. Mandal S, Bhan S. The centre-edge angle of Wiberg in the adult Indian population. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1996 Mar;78(2):320–1.
  8. Sharp IK. Acetabular dysplasia. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1961 May 1;43-B(2):268–72.
  9. Nakamura S, Ninomiya S, Nakamura T. Primary osteoarthritis of the hip joint in Japan. Clin Orthop. 1989 Apr;(241):190–6.
  10. Hoaglund FT, Low WD. Anatomy of the femoral neck and head, with comparative data from Caucasians and Hong Kong Chinese. Clin Orthop. 1980 Oct;(152):10–6.
  11. Reikerås O, Bjerkreim I, Kolbenstvedt A. Anteversion of the acetabulum and femoral neck in normals and in patients with osteoarthritis of the hip. Acta Orthop Scand. 1983 Feb;54(1):18–23.
  12. Asala SA, Mbajiorgu FE, Papandro BA. A comparative study of femoral head diameters and sex differentiation in Nigerians. Acta Anat (Basel). 1998;162 (4):232–7.
  13. Chauhan R, Dhaon B. Anatomical Parameters Of North Indian Hip Joints – Cadaveric Study. 2002;

Corresponding Author

Muhammad bin Abdul Hamid

Junior Resident, Deptt of Orthopaedic Surgery, Government Medical College, Srinagar, India