Title: Early Detection of Malignancy using Cytokeratin, HMB45 and Vimentin in OPD Patients with Marjolin’s Ulcer

Authors: Dr Saurabh Gupta, Dr Aarti B. Bhattacharya, Dr Rashmi Chaturvedi, Dr Sanjiv Bhatia

 DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.18535/jmscr/v8i4.04

Abstract

   

Objective: To study clinico-pathological features of Marjolin’s ulcer patients attending surgical clinics and to classify Marjolin’s ulcer using Cytokeratin, Vimentin and HMB45 expression.

Methods: A cross-sectional clinical correlation study was done on 39 patients who presented to surgical OPD with clinical diagnosis of Marjolin's ulcer arising from chronic skin conditions. Histopathological evaluation and Immunohistochemistry was performed in all cases. Statistics Chi square test and statistical package for social science software (SPSS) version 23. P value <0.05 was taken as statistically significant.

Results: Of the total 39 cases majority of the cases were in the age group of 41-50 years (30.76%) with mean age of 47.53 years. M:F ratio was 2:1. Burn was the most common lesion (66.67%) followed by trauma (30.80%) and surgical scar (2.60%). Foot was the most common site of lesion (28.20%) followed by leg (25.64%). Mean time interval taken was 13.12 years. Shortest time interval was 6 years, whereas longest time taken was 25 years. Well differentiated Squamous cell carcinoma was the most common histology type (79.48%) followed by moderately differentiated Squamous cell Carcinoma. One case of sarcomatoid carcinoma is also present (02.56%). 25.64% of cases had lymph node metastasis. Majority of the cases were positive for cytokeratin stain (97.43%) followed by one case positive for both Cytokeratin and Vimentin (2.56%).

Conclusion: Burn scar transformation into malignancy was more prominent than other causes. The grade of the tumor and presence of metastasis greatly influence the prognosis of the patient. By application of immunohistochemical stains, we were able to delineate the origin of the malignancy, being epithelial, mesenchymal or melanotic.

Keywords: Marjolin’s ulcer, Chronic Skin Conditions, Grade, Lymph Node Metastasis.

References

  1. Ochenduszkiewicz U, Matkowski1 R, Szynglarewicze B, Kornafel J: Marjolin’s ulcer: malignant neoplasm arising in scars. Rep Pract Oncol Radiother 2006, 11 (3):135-138v.
  2. Novick M, Gard DA, Hardy SB. Burn scar carcinoma: a review and analysis of 46 cases. J Trauma. 1977;17:809–17.
  3. Arons MS, Rodin AE, Lynch JB, Lewis SR, Blocker TG Jr: Scar tissue carcinoma. Part II: an experimental study with special reference to burn scar carcinoma. Ann Surg 1966, 163:445-460.
  4. Hayashi M, Tamura G, Kato N, Ansai S, Kondo S, Motoyama T. Genetic analysis of cutaneous squamous cell carcinomas arising from different areas. Path Inter. 2003; 53:602–7.
  5. Nagata S: Apoptosis by death factor Cell 88:355-365, 1997
  6. Lee SH, Shin MS, Kim HS. Somatic mutations of Fas (Apo-1/CD95) gene in cutaneous cell carcinomas arising from a burn scar. J Invest Dermatol. 1999; 114:122–6.
  7. Chun-Yuan Huang, Chung-Ho Feng, Yen-Chang Hsiao, Shiow Shuh Chuang & Jui-Yung Yang (2010) Burn scar carcinoma, Journal of Dermatological Treatment, 21:6, 350-356
  8. Soo HB, Dong KJ, Chang JH. Clinical Study of Marjolin’s Ulcer. Yonsei Medical Journal. Vol 31, No. 3, 1990
  9. Hill B.B., Sloan D.A., Lee E.Y. Marjolin's ulcer of the foot caused by non burn trauma. South Med J. 1996;89(7):707–710
  10. Phillipo L Chalya1*, Joseph B Mabula1; Marjolin’s ulcers at a university teaching hospital in North-western Tanzania: a retrospective review of 56 cases Chalya et al. World Journal of Surgical Oncology 2012, 10:38
  11. Challa VR, Deshmane V, Reddy BMA. A Retrospective Study of Marjolin's Ulcer Over an Eleven Year Period. J Cutan Aesthet Surg. 2014 Jul-Sep; 7(3): 155–159
  12. Mohammad Sadegh Fazeli, Amir Hosein Lebaschi Marjolin's ulcer: clinical and pathologic features of 83 cases and review of literature Med J Islam Repub Iran. 2013 Nov; 27(4): 215–224
  13. Kowal-Vern A, Criswell B.k. Burn scar neoplasms: A literature review and statistical analysis. Burns. 2005;31 (4):403–13.
  14. Giblin T, Pickell K, Pitts W, Armstrong D. Malignant Degeneration in Burn Scars: Marjolin's Ulcer. Annals of Surgery. 1965. Volume 162, Number 2
  15. Love RL, Breidahl AF. Acute squamous cell carcinoma arising within a recent burn scar in a 14 year old boy. Plast Recon Surg. 2000; 106:1069–71.
  16. Onesti MG, Fino P, Fioramonti P, Amorosi V, Scuderi N. Ten years of experience in chronic ulcers and malignant transformation. Int Wound J 2015; 12:447–450
  17. Alconchel MD, Olivares C, Alvarez R. Squamous cell carcinoma, malignant melanoma and malignant fibrous histiocytoma arising in burn scars. Br J Dermatol. 1997; 137:793–8.
  18. Ozyazgan I, Kontaş O. Burn scar sarcoma. Burns. 1999;25(5):455–8.
  19. Taxy JB, Battifora H. Malignant fibrous histiocytoma. Cancer. 1977;40:254
  20. Copcu E. Marjolin's ulcer: a preventable complication of burns? Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 2009 Jul; 124(1):156e-64e.
  21. Bradford PT. Skin cancer in skin of color. Dermatol Nurs. 2009 Jul-Aug;21(4):170-7, 206; quiz 178.

Corresponding Author

Dr Saurabh Gupta

Resident, Department of Pathology, Hind Institute of Medical Sciences, Barabanki, Uttar Pradesh, India