Title: Recent trend of clinico-pathological presentation of malignant soft tissue sarcoma patients - a retrospective study at Regional Institute of Medical Sciences (RIMS), Manipur

Authors: Yumkhaibam Sobita Devi, Arindam Bhaumik, Deiwakor Chyrmang, Srigopal Mohanty, Laishram Jaichand singh

 DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.18535/jmscr/v7i9.83

Abstract

  

Background: Increasing incidence of soft tissue sarcoma (STS) in recent years has created a major health problem. Knowledge of clinical presentation of patients with soft tissue sarcoma may help in planning prevention, early detection and treatment of STS in this region (MANIPUR)

Methods: This is a retrospective case study on 55 cases of STS patients who were registered at Regional Institute of Medical Sciences, Manipur during the period from January, 2015 to December, 2018. The data were analyzed using SPSS-21 and the results were presented in percentage and simple frequency.

Result: Among the patients, the ages ranged from 14 to 81 yrs. Maximum number of patients reaches a peak between 60 - 81 years (56.0%). Painless mass (52%) was the most common presentation, 6% presented with only pain, 32% presented with painful mass. Duration of symptoms was less than 6 months for more than half of the patients (52%). In this study, maximum (42%) of STS cases were found in extremities (upper limb and lower limb), most commonly in the lower extremity (26%). 12%, 8%, 10% and 12% of STS cases were found in retroperitoneum, abdominal wall / trunk, head and neck region and pelvic cavity respectively. Very less number (14%) of cases were found in the other parts of the body. According to this study, we had data on 12 histological subtypes of STS, among which leiomyosarcoma had maximum incidence (22%), followed by fibrosarcoma (12%), liposarcoma (12%) and GIST (12%), sarcoma not otherwise specified (10%) and less percentage of other rare subtypes (malignant fibrous histiosarcoma- 4%, rhabdomyosarcoma-6%, peripheral nerve sheath tumour-4%, extra skeletal ewing’s sarcoma-6%, kaposi’s sarcoma-8%, sarcomatoid mesothelioma-2%, neuroblastoma-2%) also found. In this study, half of the patients (50%) had tumour size of 5-10 cm and 24% patients had node positivity and 18% of patients had metastatic disease at the time of diagnosis.

Conclusion: Majority of the patients was males (52%) and most of the patients were in the age group of 60-81 years. From among the types of STS, leiomyosarcoma has the highest incidence (22%). 42% of STS cases were found in the extremities, most commonly in the lower extremity (26%). At the time of diagnosis, 24% of patients had node positive and 18% had metastatic disease. Knowledge of clinical presentation of patients with soft tissue sarcoma may help in planning prevention, early detection and treatment of STS in this region (MANIPUR)

Keywords: Clinical presentation, Histopathology, Soft tissue sarcoma.

References

  1. Siegel RL, Miller KD, Jemal A. Cancer Statistics, 2017. CA Cancer J Clin 2017;67:7–30.
  2. Bhatt N, Deady S, Gillis A, Bertuzzi A, Fabre A, Heffernan E, et Epidemiological study of soft‐tissue sarcomas in Ireland. Cancer Med. 2016 Jan;5(1):129-35.
  3. Saltus CW, Calingaert B, Candrilli S, Lorenzo M, D’yachkova Y, Otto T, et Epidemiology of adult soft-tissue sarcomas in Germany. Sarcoma. 2018;2018.
  4. Toro JR, Travis LB, Wu HJ, Zhu K, Fletcher CD, Devesa SS. Incidence patterns of soft tissue sarcomas, regardless of primary site, in the surveillance, epidemiology and end results program, 1978–2001: an analysis of 26,758 Int J Cancer. 2006 Dec 15;119(12):2922-30.
  5. Lahat G, Lazar A, Lev D. Sarcoma epidemiology and etiology: potential environmental and genetic factors. Surg Clin North Am. 2008 Jun 1;88(3):451- 81.
  6. Kuruva SP, Bala S, Konatam ML, Karnam AK, Maddali LS, Gundeti Clinicopathological features, treatment and survival outcomes of synovial sarcoma. South Asian J Cancer. 2018 Oct;7(4):270.
  7. Siwillis EM, Dharse NJ, Scanlan T, Ngoma M, Abraham ZS, Kahiu Pediatric Soft Tissue and Bone Sarcomas in Tanzania: Epidemiology and Clinical Features. J Glob Oncol. 2019 Mar 27;5:1-6.
  8. Natekar A, Basu S, Gupta G, Pujari M. Spectrum of bone and soft tissue tumors in a tertiary cancer institute in Eastern India. Int J Res Med Sci. 2018 Aug;6(8):2686-2690.
  9. Kadhim M, Oyoun NA, Womer RB, Dormans JP. Clinical and radiographic presentation of pelvic sarcoma in children. SICOT-J. 2018;4.
  10. Johnson CJ, Pynsent PB, Grimer RJ. Clinical features of soft tissue sarcomas. J Glob Oncol. 2001 May;83(3):203.
  11. Ashamalla M, Guirguis A, Mokhtar BE, Ashamalla H. Clinical Presentation and Patterns of Care in SCARE Soft Tissue Sarcoma. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2017 Oct 1;99(2):E749.
  12. Dyrop HB, Vedsted P, Safwat A, Maretty-Nielsen K, Hansen BH, Jørgensen PH, Baad-Hansen T, Keller J. Alarm symptoms of soft-tissue and bone sarcoma in patients referred to a specialist center. Acta Orthop. 2014 Dec 1;85(6):657- 62.
  13. Burningham Z, Hashibe M, Spector L, Schiffman JD. The epidemiology of Clin Sarcoma Res. 2012 Dec;2(1):14.
  14. Fletcher CDM, Bridge JA, Hogendoorn PC, et al., eds. World Health Organization classification of tumours of soft tissue and bone. 4th ed. Lyon, France: IARC Press, 2013.
  15. Brady MS, Gaynor JJ, Brennan MF. Radiation-associated sarcoma of bone and soft tissue. Arch Surg 1992;127(12):1379–1385
  16. Lawrence W Jr, Donegan WL, Natarajan N, et al. Adult soft tissue sarcomas. A pattern of care survey of the American College of Surgeons. Ann Surg 1987;205:349–359.
  17. Daigeler A, Kuhnen C, Moritz R, et al. Lymph node metastases in soft tissue sarcomas: a single center analysis of 1,597 patients. Langenbecks Arch Surg 2009;394:321–32.

Corresponding Author

Arindam Bhaumik

M.D - Radiation Oncology