Details
Category: Volume 07 Issue 09 September 2019
Hits: 1131

Title: Effect of Physical Activity on PEFR in Apparently Normal & Healthy Subjects, a cross sectional analytical study

Authors: Dr Manohar Lal Bhandari, Dr Priyanka Verma, Dr R. K Choudhary, Dr Sachin Kuchya

 DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.18535/jmscr/v7i9.53

Abstract

    

Introduction

In diagnosis and treatment of respiratory diseases, the assessment of lung functions is of considerable importance(1). The Peak Expiratory flow Rate (PEFR) is a simple, reproducible & easily affordable test of lung function. Standard or Reference PEFR, hence forth called as Reference PEFR values for an individual subject depends upon his / her gender, height, weight, ethnicity & smoking status(2), are obtained with the help of specific formulae’s or with the help of nomograms.

An Individual subject has a PEFR, determined with the help of peak flow meter, the Cipla Breathometer(3) being the most studied one. The PEFR of an individual subject varies with the reference value. A higher deviation is often seen in those with respiratory illness, which is used for diagnosis or treatment of Respiratory Illness. The said deviation is also seen in subjects without history of any Respiratory or related Illness.

This cross sectional study was conducted to measure the PEFR values and an attempt has been made to find out the correlation between PEFR values and dynamic anthropometric parameter such as Chest expansion & Physical activity.

References

  1. Dhungel KU1, Parthasarathy D, Dipali S. Peak expiratory flow rate of Nepalese children and young adults. Kathmandu Univ Med J (KUMJ).2008 Jul-Sep;6(23):346-54.
  2. Ebomoyi MI1, Iyawe VIVariations of peak expiratory flow rate with anthropometric determinants in a population of healthy adult nigerians. Niger J Physiol Sci.2005 Jun-Dec;20(1-2):85-9.
  3. Kodgule R R, Singh V, Dhar R, Saicharan B G, Madas S J, Gogtay J A, Salvi S S, Koul P A. Reference values for peak expiratory flow in Indian adult population using a European Union scale peak flow meter. J Postgrad Med 2014;60:123-9
  4. Islam MN1, Islam MN, Hoque MA, Latif SA, Mollah AH, Hossain MA, Husain MF, Rahman MA, Akhtaruzzaman M, Khan AH, Paul BK, Kundu GK. Peak expiratory flow rate of normal school going children in Mymensingh municipality. Mymensingh Med J.2013 Jul;22(3):438-43.
  5. Gagnier JJ1, Morgenstern H. Misconceptions, Misuses, and Misinterpretations of P Values and Significance Testing. J Bone Joint Surg Am.2017 Sep 20;99(18):1598-1603. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.16.01314
  6. Karthik PS1, Chandrasekhar M2, Ambareesha K3, Nikhil C Effect of pranayama and suryanamaskar on pulmonary functions in medical students. J Clin Diagn Res.2014 Dec;8(12):BC04-6. doi: 10.7860/JCDR/2014/10281.5344. Epub 2014 Dec 5.
  7. Physical Activity Guidelines Advisory Committee (PAGAC). Physical Activity Guidelines Advisory Committee Report, 2008. Washington, DC, US Department of Health and Human Services, 2008.
  8. Bauman A, Lewicka M, Schöppe S. The Health Benefits of Physical Activity in Developing Countries. Geneva, World Health Organization, 2005.
  9. Warburton D et al. A systematic review of the evidence for Canada’s Physical Activity Guidelines for Adults. International Journal of Behavioural Nutrition and Physical Activity, 2009 [under review for publication].
  10. Rajani S. Pagare, Ratnaprabha B. Pedhambkar. ASSESSMENT OF REFERENCE VALUES OF CHEST EXPANSION AMONG HEALTHY ADULTS IN PUNE, INDIA. Int J Physiother Res 2017;5(1):1819-1823.

Corresponding Author

Dr Priyanka Verma