Title: Medical Autopsy Need of Time

Authors: Harish Bohra, Khethmal P, Sukanata Tripathy

 DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.18535/jmscr/v7i7.172

Abstract

With the advent of modern diagnostic technology, use of the autopsy as a means of assessing diagnostic accuracy has declined precipitously. However, the rate of misdiagnosis found at autopsy has not changed. The purpose of the present study was to analyze the discrepancies obtained from the comparison between clinical and autopsy diagnosis in a tertiary care hospital. Medical records, autopsy reports and death certificates were analyzed for 59 consecutive autopsies performed over a 2 yrs period from Jan 2009 to Dec 2010, who died in a tertiary care hospital in Delhi. Errors in clinical diagnosis were assigned to one of four classes as suggested by Goldman. Total Deaths were 1055 and total 59 (5.6%) autopsies were performed. The mean age of patients excluding neonates was 36.2 years (range 1 day -59 days) and average length of stay was 6.2 days (range few hours to 42 days). Major discrepancies involving cause of death was 17 (28.8%). Additional findings not detected antemortem were 42 (71.1%). The class I error were 10 (23.7%) of Class II error, 13 (22.1%) of class II errors, class III 20 (32.3%) and class IV were 7 (11.9%). In 9 cases not enough information was found in the medical records to carry out a diagnostic correlation analysis. Discrepancies between Clinical and Autopsy Diagnosis continues to be high. Unexpected findings are identified relatively more frequently at autopsy, when the autopsy is proceed by a short hospital stay.The autopsy remains a vital tool for determining diagnostic accuracy, despite modern modalities of clinical investigation and diagnosis.

References

  1. Pai SA. Autopsy. In: Lock S, Last JM, Dunea G (eds). The Oxford illustrated companion to medicine. Oxford:Oxford University Press; 2001:88–90..
  2. Campos FPF, Rocha LOS. The pedagogical value of autopsy. Autops Case Rep 2015;5:1-6.
  3. van den Tweel JG, Taylor CR. The rise and fall of the autopsy. Virchows Arch 2013;462:371-80
  4. Pujol FR, Bernet VM, Castellsague J, et al. Análisis de concordancia entre diagnósticos clínicos y de autopsia en un hospital general. An Med Interna 1994;5:48-56..
  5. Tavora F, Crowder CD, Sun CC, et al. Discrepancies between clinical and Autopsy diagnosis: A comparison of University, Community, and Private Autopsy practices. Am J Clin Pathol 2008;129:102-109.
  6. Nemetz PN, Tanglos E, Sands LP, et al. Attitudes Toward the Autopsy – An 8-State Survey. Medscape General Medicine 2006;8:80.
  7. Arce MF, Fernández FF, Mayorga FM, et al. La autopsia clínica. Revista Electrónica de la Autopsia 2009;7.
  8. Pakis I, Polat O, Yayci N, et al. Comparison of the clinical diagnosis and subsequent autopsy indings in medical malpractice. Am J Forensic Med Pathol 2010;31:218-221.
  9. Ayoub T, Chow J. The conventional autopsy in modern medicine. J R Soc Med 2008;101:177-181.
  10. Richardson LCV, Coronel MDL. Discrepancia entre los diagnósticos clínicos y por autopsia en un hospital pediátrico de tercer nivel. Bol Med Hosp Infant Mex 2006;63:232-240.
  11. Goldman L, Sayson R, Robbins S, et al. The value of the autopsy in three medical eras. N Engl J Med 1983;308:1000-1005.
  12. Minces P, Schnitzler E. Necropsy: The importance of being aware of discrepancies. Pediatr Crit Care Med 2006;7:487-488.
  13. Sonderegger K, Burger S, Muntwyler J, et al. Diagnostic errors in three medical eras: a necropsy study. Lancet 2000;355: 2027-2031.
  14. Mark EJ. The state and use of the autopsy around the world. Histopathology 2002; 41:197-21
  15. Roulson J, Benbow EW, Hasleton PS. Discrepancies between clinical and autopsy diagnosis and the value of post mortem histology; a meta-analysis and review. Histopathology 2005;47:551-559.
  16. Editorials ‘Living in the clouds of a vain illusion’:The decline and fall of clinical autopsies THE NATIONAL MEDICAL JOURNAL OF INDIA VOL. 29, NO. 3, 2016 125-128.
  17. The annual reports (2016-17) Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research (Chandigarh), Seth Gordhandas Sunderdas Medical College and King Edward Memorial Hospital (KEM), Mumbai, All India Institute of Medical Sciences New Delhi and  National Institute of Mental Health and Neuro Sciences, Bengaluru.
  18. María Victoria González-Franco, Marco Antonio Ponce-Camacho, Oralia Barboza-Quintana, Jesús Ancer-Rodríguez, Luis Angel Ceceñas-Falcón. Discrepancies between clinical and autopsy diagnosis: A study of 331 autopsies performed over a 7 years period. Medicina Universitaria 2012;14(54):16-22.

Corresponding Author

Khethmal P

Senior Demonstrator, Dept of Pathology, Government Medical College (RJMES), Pali, Rajasthan, India