Title: Comparative evaluation of three different tooth coloured and light cured restorative materials on cervical abrasion lesions- A clinical study

Authors: K Ayyappan, Manoj S, Kurian K George, Jolly Mary Varghese

 DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.18535/jmscr/v7i7.145

Abstract

Aim: This study was conducted to compare the clinical performance of three different tooth colored and light cured materials like Dyract-Compomer, Fuji LC and TPH posterior composite on cervical abrasion lesions.

Materials and Methods: The properties evaluated here are colour match, cavo surface marginal discoloration, marginal adaptation, secondary caries, anatomic form and surface texture. These properties are evaluated by using the USPHS criteria over a period of one year. Patients with three adjacent Supra gingival cervical abrasion lesions were selected. All lesions ware buccal, caries free, non-undercut cervical abrasion lesions which extended into dentin

Results: Of the three materials studied the clinical performance of Fuji II LC found 100% success in all the properties evaluated in the present study. The other two materials also showed 100% success except for marginal adaptation and anatomic form. In these properties the composite restoration showed 18.7% and Dyract showed 49% success after one year.

Keywords: Tooth coloured restorative materials, cervical abrasion lesions.

References

  1. Crocc, Killian (1990). Using Glass Ionomers. Kada (121) 181-183.
  2. Barnes, D.M., Blank, L.W., Gingell, J.C. And Gilner, P.P. : A Clinical Evaluation Of A Resin-Modified Glass Ionomer Restorative Material. J.A.D.A. 1995, 126; 1245–1253.
  3. Chaiwat Maneenut, Martin.J. Tyas (Nov: 1995). Clinical Evaluation Of Resin - Modified Glass Ionomer Restorative Cements In Cervical 'Abrasion' Lesions One Year Study. Quint: Int: (26) 739-743.
  4. B. Mitra, Adhesion To Dentine And Physical Properties Of A Light Cured Glass Ionomer Liner/Base. J Dent Res. 1991 Jan;70(1):72-4.
  5. Mclean Jw, Nicholson Jw, Wilson Ad Proposed Nomenclature For Glass-Ionomer Dental Cements And Related Materials. Quintessence Int. 1994 Sep;25(9):587-9
  6. Inokoshi S, Burrow Mf, Kataumi M, Yamada T, Takatsu Opacity And Colour Changes Of Tooth - Coloured Restorative Materials. Oper Dent. 1996 Mar-Apr;21(2):73-80 17.
  7. Mount Gj. Adhesion Of Glass Ionomer Cement In The Clinical Environment. Oper Dent. 1991 Jul-Aug;16(4):141-8
  8. Aboush Ye, Jenkins Cb An Evaluation Of Bonding Of Glass Ionomer Restoratives Of Dentine And Enamel. Br Dentj, 1986 Sept.6. 179-184.
  9. J, Christenson (Aug: 1995). Restorative Dentistry.An Update. Jada (126) 1165-1168.
  10. D.Puclett, James.G. Fitchie, Beth Benett, John-H.Hembree (Nov: 1995). Micro Leakage And Thermal Properties Of Hybrid Ionomers. Quint: Int: (26) 577-581.
  11. C.L., Degee. A.J (1994). Self Repair Of Damaged Glass Ionomer Cement, J.Dent, Res (73)181.
  12. Wilson, E.L. Pashley, L. Tao, W.G. Matthews, D.H. Pashley (1993). Bond Strengths Of Superficial, Intermediate And Deep Dentine In Vivo With Four Dent In Bonding Systems. Dent: Mater. (9) 19-12.
  13. V.H (1996). Sealing Capacity Of Resin - Modified Glass - Ionomer And Resin Composite Placed In Vivo In Class V Restorations. J. Oper. Dent. (21) 69-72.
  14. S. Mathis, J.L. Ferracane (1989). Properties Of Glass Ionomer Resin-Composite Hybrid Material. Dent. Mater,5(5) ;355-358.
  15. H.O, Sturdevant. J.R, Bayne. S. Wilder. A.D(1991). Examining The Tooth Flexure Effects On Cervical Restorations: A Two Year Clinical Study. J Am Dent Assoc, 1991, (122) (5);41-47

Corresponding Author

Manoj S

Associate Professor in OMFS department, Government Medical College, Manjeri