Details
Category: Volume 07 Issue 07 July 2019
Hits: 1049

Title: Mischevious Lymph Node in Peadriatic Age Group

Authors: Roopali Jandial, Ritu Bhagat, Kuldeep Singh

 DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.18535/jmscr/v7i7.89

Abstract

Introduction: Assessment of a child with lymphadenopathy is a common clinical consequence for the pediatricians. They are considered enlarged when their diameter transcends 1cm for cervical and axillary nodes and more than 1.5 cm for inguinal nodes.

Method and Material: This prospective study was carried out over a period of one year in the department of Pathology, Government Medical College, Jammu, India. All pediatric cases (up to 17 years) with palpable lymph nodes attending the cytology section of the department were included.The aim of this study is to evaluate the role of FNAC in the diagnosis of pediatric lymphadenopathy and to study diverse cytomorpho­logical patterns and their incidence in lymph node aspirates.

Results: A total of 129 cases were studied. The age range we included was 0-17 years. Majority of the patients with lymphadenopathy were in the age group of 6-10 years 52%. The male to female ratio was found to be 3:1. The most common group of lymph nodes involved was cervical group 94%. Sixty-seven cases presented with multiple lymph node enlargement. Non neoplastic group of lesions dominated the study, most common diagnosis was non specific reactive lymphadenitis with 60.5% cases.Among the neoplastic lesions one case each of Hodgkin lymphoma, non Hodgkin lymphoma and metastatic tumour were seen over the study period.

Conclusion: The FNAC is a cost effective diagnostic procedure to diagnose majority of cases. This helps in avoiding unnecessary invasive procedures and associated complications.

Keywords: Childern, Lymph node, Peadriatics, Reactive.

References

  1. Lymphadenitis and Lymphangitis. In: Case Based Pedi­atrics For Medical Students and Residents. New York: Churchill Livingstone. 2003:34.
  2. EU Regulations for Clinical Studies in Pediatric Pa­tients. EU Pediatric Patient Guidelines. (EC) No. 1901/2006 (amended by 1902/2006).
  3. Andrew W. Bazemore. Lymphadenopathy and Malig­nancy.AmFam Physician. 2002;66:2103-11.
  4. Chesney P. Cervical Adenopathy. Pediatrics in Review. 1994;15:276-284.
  5. Kliegman M. Robert, Behrman E. Richard. The Lym­phatic System. In: Nelson Textbook of Pediatrics 18 Ed. Elsevier. 2007;2:2093.
  6. Handa U, Mohan H, Bal A. Role offine needle aspiration cytology in evaluation ofpaediatric lymphadenopathy. Cytopathology. 2003:14; 66 – 69
  7. Ajmal F, Imran A. Comparison of FNACvs excision biopsy for suspected tuberculous cervicallymphadenopathy. Annals King Edward med coll. 2003; 9:216-8.
  8. Hafez NH, Tahoun NS. Reliability of fine needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) as a diagnostic tool in cases of cervical lymphadenopathy. J Egypt NatlCanc Inst 2011;23: 105-114.
  9. Wakely PE Jr, Kardos TF, Frable WJ. Application of fine needle aspiration biopsy to pediatrics. Hum Pathol. 1988;19:1383-6.
  10. Ponder TB, Smith D, RamzyI. Lymphadenopathy in children and adolescents: role of fine-needle aspiration in management. Cancer Detect Prev. 2000;24:228-33.
  11. Bezabih M, Mariam DW, Selassie SG.Fine needle aspiration cytology of suspected tuberculous lymphadenitis. Cytopathology. 2002;13:284-90.
  12. Mitra S, Ray S, Mitra PK. Fine needle aspiration cytology of supraclavicular lymph nodes: Our experience over a three-year period. J Cytol. 2011;28:108-10.
  13. Haque MA, Talukder SI. Evaluation of fine needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) of lymph node in Mymensingh. Mymensingh Med J. 2003;12:33-5.
  14. Pandit AA, Candes FP, Khubchandani SR. Fine needle aspiration cytology of lymph nodes. J Postgrad Med. 1987;33:134.
  15. Tariq Ahmad, Mohammad Naeem, Siddique Ahmad, AmbreenSamad, Amir Nasir. J Ayub Med CollAbbottabad. 2008;20:34-37.
  16. Steel BL S, Schwartz MR, Ramzy I. Fine needle aspiration biopsy in the diagnosis of lymphadenopathy in 1,103 patients. Role, limitations and analysis of diagnostic pitfalls. ActaCytol. 1995;39:76-81.
  17. MukhtarHussain, Akram Shad Chisti, RubinaMukhtar, Hanif Khan, HussainSiddiqui, HaroonKd Pasha. Peripheral Lymphadenopathy in Children, Comparison of Fine Needle Aspiration Cytology with Open Biopsy. Ann King Edward Med Coll. 2005;11:398-9.
  18. K Alam, V Maheshwari, N Haider, FA Siddiqui, A Jain, AH Khan: Fine needle aspiration cytology (FNAC), a handy tool for metastatic lymphadenopathy. The Internet Journal of Pathology. 2010;10:21-28.
  19. Kumral A, Olgun N, Uysal KM, Corapcioğlu F, Oren H, Sarialioğlu F. Assessment of peripheral lymphadenopathies: experience at a pediatric hematology-oncology department in Turkey. PediatrHematolOncol. 2002;19:211-8.
  20. Lake MA, Oski FA. Peripheral lymphadenopathy in childhood. Am J Dis child. 1978;132:357-359.
  21. Annam V, Kulkarni MH, Puranik RB. Clinicopathologic profile of significant cervical lymphadenopathy in children aged 1-12 years. ActaCytol. 2009;53:174-8.
  22. Hag IA, Chiedozi LC, al Reyees FA, Kollur SM. Fine needle aspiration cytology of head and neck masses. Seven years' experience in a secondary care hospital. ActaCytol. 2003;47:387-92.
  23. Bhandari B, Jain AM. Lymph node biopsy in infants and children A new bedside method. Arch of Dis child. 1970; 45:510-512.

Corresponding Author

Dr Ritu Bhagat

Department of Pathology, Government Medical College, Jammu, J&K, India