Title: Incidence of wound infection post subcuticular suturing versus simple suturing a comparative study in KMC, Katihar
Authors: Dr Shakeb Ahmad, Dr Md. Abdur Rahman, Dr Yasir Tajdar, Dr Ankita Sharma, Dr Sunil Kumar, Dr Shashank Saurav, Dr Tuba Yazdani
DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.18535/jmscr/v7i7.76
Abstract
To prevent SSI post surgery is an important aim after every surgery. There are two methods of wound closure technique i.e. simple wound closure and subcuticular suturing which is cosmetically better suturing technique. A prospective non-randomized study of 100 patients with surgical wound was carried out over a period of 12 months(June 2018 to June 2019) in 50 patients (group A), wound closure was done with simple interrupted method and in 50 patients(group B) with subcuticular method. This study was done in Katihar medical college, Katihar. Data including age, sex, wound infection, wound type were collected. 3% of patients in group A and 2% in group B had wound infection. Wound type of 65% of the group A and 58% of patients in the group B were clean contaminated. 42 percent of patients in group A and 36 % of patients in group B are located in the age of 21 to 40 years. 74% of group A and 70% of group B were male. Surgical site of 88 %, 1%, 2% and 9% of patients in group A and 80%, 2%, 10% and 8% of patients in group B was in abdomen, thorax, head and neck and extremity, respectively. Incidence of wound infection in patients who had surgical wounds sutured by subcuticular and simple were 8% and 4%, respectively that this difference was not statistically significant. Therefore in our study it depicts that subcuticular suturing is having better aesthetic result. In our study, the incidence of wound infection was lower than other studies.
Keywords: Infection, simple, subcuticular.
References
- Grant SW, Hopkins J, Wilson SE; Operative site bacteriology as an indicator of postoperative infectious complications in elective colorectal surgery. Am Surg., 1995; 61(10):856-61.
- Borges AF; Techniques of wound suture. Elective Incisions and Scar Revision. Boston: Little Brown., 1973;65-76.
- Kudur MH, Pai SB, Sripathi H, Prabhu S; Sutures and suturing techniques in skin closure. Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol., 2009;75:425-34.
- Moy RL, Waldman B, Hein DW; A review of sutures and suturing techniques. J Dermatol Surg Oncol., 1992;18:785-95.
- Zachary CB; Suture techniques. In: Zachary CB, editor. Basic Cutaneous Surgery. New York: Churchill Livingstone., 1991;53-75.
- Moy RL, Lee A, Zalka A; Commonly used suturing techniques in skin surgery. American Family Physician., 1991;44(5): 1625–34.
- Sakka SA, Graham K, Abdulah A; Skin closure in hip surgery: subcuticular versus transdermal. A prospective randomized study. Acta Orthop Belg., 1995;61(4):331-6.
- Zografos GC, Martis K, Morris DL;Laser Doppler flowmetry in evaluation of cutaneous wound blood flow using various suturing techniques. Ann Surg., 1992; 215(3):266-8.
- Fiennes AG; Interrupted subcuticular polyglactin sutures for abdominal wounds. Ann R Coll Surg Engl., 1985;67:121.
- Corder AP, Schache DJ, Farquharson SM, Stephen GT; Wound infection following high saphenous ligation. A trial comparing two skin closure techniques: Subcuticular polyglycolic acid and interrupted monofilament nylon mattress sutures. Journal of the Royal College of Surgeons of Edinburgh., 1991;36(2):100-2.
- Gilmore OJA., Martin TDM; Aetiology and prevention of wound infection in appendectomy. Br. J. Surg., 1974; 61(4):281-87.
- Foster GE, Hardy EG, Hardcastle JD; Subcuticular suturing after appendicectomy. Lancet., 1977;1(8022): 1128-9.