Title: The Accuracy of Diagnostic High Frequency Ultrasound Imaging For Musculoskeletal Soft Tissue Pathology

Authors: Dr Pooja Shamsukha, Dr Prasanna Mishrikotkar

 DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.18535/jmscr/v7i3.132

Abstract

Introduction: With increased incidence of sports injuries the practice of musculoskeletal ultrasound is gaining wide popularity outside the traditional radiology practice. Use of musculoskeletal ultrasound other than for sports injuries includes evaluation of musculoskeletal soft tissue pathologies. Ultrasonography is a non-invasive, readily available, safe, low cost and a patient comfortable modality. Application of high resolution USG in soft tissue pathologies of musculoskeletal system has evolved exponentially in the past two decades and is useful in not only evaluating the nature of soft tissue swellings but also aids in detection of histology in mostly all cases. We undertook this study to analyze the accuracy of USG in diagnosing soft tissue musculoskeletal pathologies.

Materials and Methods: This was a prospective study conducted in the Department of Radiodiagnosis of a tertiary care medical college situated in an urban area. 200 subjects with superficial soft tissue swellings referred from various clinical departments were included in this study on the basis of a predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria. All the soft tissue swellings were imaged by with high resolution USG transducer of 4-12 MHz with Seimens Acuson NX3 and Phillips Affinity -30. The sonographic indices of the soft tissue swellings noted were location/plane, nature, size, margin, echo pattern and calcification. Vascularity of the lesions was assessed with color and spectral Doppler parameters. The ultrasonographic diagnosis was then correlated initially on the clinical diagnosis. Soft tissue swellings like foreign bodies, liquefied abscess and hematomas were 19 readily confirmed to evaluate the accuracy of USG in these lesions. In patients who underwent surgical excision a correlation of USG and HPE was also done. For statistical purposes p value less than 0.05 was taken as statistically significant.

Results: Out of total 200 patients there were 92 males and 108 females with a M:F ratio of 1:1.17. The mean ageof the studied cases was found to be 33.31 +/- 16.44. Majority of the patients (55.5%) presented aspainless swelling while painful swelling and traumatic swelling was seen in 54 (27%) and 35 (17.5%) patients respectively. Common locations were upper limb (33%) followed by lower limb (27.5%).Majority of the lesion were subcutaneous (60.5%) followed by arising from deeper structures (13%). On ultrasound 113 (62.5%) patients had solid lesions whereas cystic and mixed echogenic lesions were seen in 61 (30.5%) and 24 (12%) patients. In majority of the cases the lesions had a well-defined margin (63%) whereas ill-defined and lobulated margins were seen in 67 (33.5%) and 5 (2.5%) patients respectively. Most lesions were either hypoechoic (41.5%) or anechoic (24%) and on Doppler majority of the lesions were avascular (73.5%). 82 (41%) patients had tumoral lesions whereas 108 (54%) were found to haven on tumoral lesions. 20 (10%) patients had foreign body as the cause of swelling and all of them were readily diagnosed on ultrasound. Most common site of lipoma was found to be tors (26/44) and majority of them were found in subcutaneous plane (77%). Lipoma, nerve sheath tumors and ganglion cysts were found to be hyperechoic (75%), hypoechoic (66.66%) and anechoic (75%) in majority of the cases.

Conclusion: High frequency ultrasound imaging is found to be capable of diagnosing musculoskeletal soft tissue pathologies with high accuracy. It has the distinct advantage of being dynamic, non-invasive, affordable, accurate, quick and accessible imaging modality for a variety of musculoskeletal soft tissue pathologies.

Keywords: soft tissue pathologies, high frequency ultrasound, Dynamic Imaging, Echogenicity.

References

  1. In: Allan, Baxter, Weston, (editors). Clinical Ultrasound. 3rd ed. Churchill Livingstone; 2011. Pp. 1109-1125.
  2. Kinare A, Brahmnalkar M, D'Costa S. Ultrasound of musculoskeletal soft tissue Indian J Radiol Imaging. 2007;17 (3):201-08.
  3. Cheng J, Tang S, Yang Y, Chou S, Wong A, Tsai W, et al. Sonographic features of soft tissue tumors in the hand and forearm. Chang Gung Med J. 2007;30:54754.
  4. Chiou H, Chou Y, Chiou S, Wang H. High-resolution USG in superficial soft tissue tumors. J Med Ultrasound. 2007;15:152-74.
  5. Cook CR. Ultrasound Imaging of the Musculoskeletal System. Vet Clin North Am Small Anim Pract. 2016 May;46 (3):355-71.
  6. Dill T. Contraindications to magnetic resonance imaging: non-invasive imaging. Heart. 2008 Jul;94(7):943-8.
  7. Lento PH, Primack S. Advances and utility of diagnostic ultrasound in musculoskeletal medicine. Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med. 2007;1(1):24-31.
  8. Lento PH, Primack S. Advances and utility of diagnostic ultrasound in musculoskeletal medicine. Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med. 2007;1(1):24-31.
  9. Wang MY, Wang XB, Sun XH, Liu FL, Huang SC. Diagnostic value of high-frequency ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging in early rheumatoid arthritis. Exp Ther Med. 2016;12(5):3035-3040.
  10. Grover VP, Tognarelli JM, Crossey MM, Cox IJ, Taylor-Robinson SD, McPhail MJ. Magnetic Resonance Imaging: Principles and Techniques: Lessons for Clinicians. J Clin Exp Hepatol. 2015;5(3):246-55.
  11. Henderson RE, Walker BF, Young KJ. The accuracy of diagnostic ultrasound imaging for musculoskeletal soft tissue pathology of the extremities: a comprehensive review of the literature. Chiropr Man Therap. 2015;23:31. Published 2015 Nov 5.
  12. Jacobson JA. Seminars in musculoskeletal radiology: 2005.New York: Copyright© 2005 by Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc; 2005. Musculoskeletal ultrasound and MRI: which do I choose? pp. 135–149. 
  13. Hong Jen, Chiou H, Chou H, Chiu S, Wang H, Chen W, Chen T, et al. Differentiation of benign and malignant superficial soft-tissue masses using grayscale and colour Doppler USG. J Chin Med Assoc. 2009:72;307-15.
  14. Hung E, James Francis Griffith1 Alex Wing Hung Ng1 Ryan Ka Lok Lee1 Domily Ting Yi Lau1 Jason Chi Shun Leung; Ultrasound of Musculoskeletal Soft-Tissue Tumors Superficial to the Investing Fascia; AJR:202, June 2014.
  15. Jo VY, Fletcher CD. WHO classification of soft tissue tumors: an update based on the 2013 4th edition. Pathology. 2014;46(2):95-104.
  16. Rahmani G, McCarthy P, Bergin D. The diagnostic accuracy of ultrasonography for soft tissue lipomas: a systematic review. Acta Radiol Open. 2017;6(6): 2058460117716704. Published 2017 Jun 30. doi:10.1177/2058460117716704
  17. Ahuja AT, King AD, Kew J, King W, Metreweli C. Head and neck lipomas:sonographic appearance. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 1998 Mar;19(3):505-8.
  18. Reynolds JH, Wolinski AP. Sonographic appearance of branchial cysts. Clin Radiol 1993;48:109–10. 24. Simonovsky V. Peripheral nerve schwannoma preoperatively diagnosed by sonography: report of three cases and discussion. Eur J Radiol 1997;25:47–51.
  19. Saboo S, Soni S, Adhane V. High-resolution sonography is effective in detection of soft tissue foreign bodies: experience from a rural Indian center. J Ultrasound Med. 2009;28(9):1245-49.
  20. Wang G, Jacobson JA, Feng FY, Girish G, Caoili EM, Brandon C. Sonography of wrist ganglion cysts: variable and noncystic appearances. J Ultrasound Med. 2007 Oct;26(10):1323-8; quiz 1330-1.

Corresponding Author

Dr Pooja Shamsukha

Resident, Department of Radiology, MGM Medical College Aurangabad (MS) India