Details
Category: Volume 07 Issue 02 February 2019
Hits: 2301

Title: Comparative Analysis of Random Blood Glucose Levels in Serum, Plasma and Whole Blood Using Glucose Oxidase and Hexokinase Methods under Spectrophotometric and Electrochemical Platforms

Authors: Joyce M. Gachoki, Dr Amos K.Mbugua PhD, Dr Stanley K. Waithaka PhD

 DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.18535/jmscr/v7i2.31

Abstract

Diabetes is, a condition associated with the impairment of the body’s ability to produce or utilise the hormone insulin. This leads to abnormal metabolism of carbohydrates and elevated levels of glucose in the blood. This serious non-communicable disease has been on the rise in Kenya partly because many people are not aware that they are diabetic since there are no serious early symptoms associated with the disease. It is estimated that the prevalence of diabetes in Kenya ranges from 2.7% (rural settings) and 10% (urban areas) affecting both the affluent and non-affluent population. It is expected that the actual numbers could be higher since many cases go unreported for lack of regular screening in the general population. In Kenya there is no study that has been conducted to compare the performance of current blood glucose testing methods being used. The suitability of serum or plasma as alternatives to whole blood has also not been well researched. The sample of choice for glucose testing has always been whole blood, either in fluoride or from a finger prick. The aim of the study was to compare the results obtained from these three sample types (whole blood, serum and plasma) using two methods: glucose oxidase and hexokinase methods. The investigation was carried out using 300 study subjects that included 150 diabetic patients attending diabetic clinic either for management, diagnosis or monitoring of blood sugar and 150 healthy individuals in the blood donation centre at Kenyatta National Hospital Nairobi County. The analytical instruments used were glucometers and a spectrophotometer to compare blood glucose levels in serum, plasma and whole blood using electrochemical and spectrophotometric platforms. While comparing the serum and plasma glucose concentration using hexokinase method under electrochemical and spectrophometric platforms, the mean difference for the two protocols was 0.145 which was found to be statistically insignificant (p=0.342) using paired T-test. Similarly while comparing the same using glucose oxidase method under the electrochemical and spectrophotometric platform, the mean difference for the two protocols was 0.012 which was found to be statistically insignificant (p=0.135) using paired T-test. The results revealed that the two methods used in glucose concentration analysis were similar irrespective of the method or sample used. There was no significant difference in their means. Either of the two methods can be used interchangeably in the analysis of glucose and either serum or plasma in fluoride can be used as a specimen of choice.

Keywords: Glucose oxidase, Hexokinase, electrochemical , spectrophotometric

References

  1. Ajjan, R. A. (2017). How Can We Realize the Clinical Benefits of Continuous Glucose Monitoring ?, 19, 27–36. http://doi.org/10.1089/dia.2017.0021
  2. Ackermann, R. T., Liss, D. T., Finch, E. A., Schmidt, K. K., Hays, L. M., Marrero, D. G., &Saha, C. (2015). A randomized comparative effectiveness trial for preventing type 2 diabetes. American Journal of Public Health, 105(11), 2328–2334. http://dx.doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2015.302641
  3. Ahmad OB, Boschi-Pinto C, Lopez AD, Murray CJL, Lozano R, Inoue M. Age Standardisation of rates: a New WHO standard. Global program on evidence for health policy discussion paper series: No 31.Geneva: World Health Organisation; 2001.
  4. Ali, M. K., Echouffo-Tcheugui, J., & Williamson, D. F. (2012). How effective were lifestyle interventions in real-world settings that were modeled on the Diabetes Prevention Program? Health Affairs, 31(1), 67–75. http://dx.doi.org/10.1377/hlthaff.2011.1009
  5. American Diabetes Association. (2016). Standards of medical care in diabetes—2016. Diabetes Care, 39(Suppl 1), S4–S5. http://dx.doi.org/10.2337/dc16-S003
  6. Arias, E. (2014). United States life tables, 2010. National Vital Statistics Reports, 63(7), 1– 62. Retrieved from http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/nvsr/nvsr63/nvsr63_07.pdf
  7. Ayyanar, K., Pichandi, S., & Janakiraman, P. (2018). Evaluation of Glucose Oxidase and Hexokinase Methods. International Journal of Biotechnology and Biochemistry, 14(1), 51–58.
  8. Ayah, R., Joshi, M. D., Wanjiru, R., Njau, E. K., Otieno, C. F., Njeru, E. K., &Mutai, K. K. (2013). A population-based survey of prevalence of diabetes and correlates in an urban slum community in Nairobi, Kenya. BMC Public Health, 13, 371. http://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-13-371
  9. Barte, J. C. M., terBogt, N. C. W., Bogers, R. P., Teixeira, P. J., Blissmer, B., Mori, T. A., & Bemelmans, W. J. E. (2010). Maintenance of weight loss after lifestyle interventions for overweight and obesity, a systematic review. Obesity Reviews, 11(12), 899–906. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-789X.2010.0074
  10. Berg JM, Tymoczko JL, Stryer L. Biochemistry. 5th edition. New York: W H Freeman; 2002. Section 30.2, Each Organ Has a Unique Metabolic Profile.Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK22436/
  11. Burrin, J. M., Price, C. P. (1985) Measurement of blood glucose. Ann. Clin. Biochem. 22, 327–342. Chromý, V., Fischer, J., Havel, J., Votava, M. (2002) Bioanalytics – Analytical Chemistry in Laboratory Medicine. Masaryk University, Brno. (in Czech)
  12. Burtis, Carl A et al. Tietz Fundamentals of Clinical Chemistry, 6th ed. Saunders: St Louis, Missouri, 2008.
  13. Carstensen B, Lindström J, Sundvall J, Borch-Johnsen K, Tuomilehto J, (2008). Measurement of blood glucose: comparison between different types of specimens. Annals of Clinical 45(2):140-8.
  14. Comparison of Three Methods for Determination of Glucose Dohnal L.1 , Kalousová M.2 , Zima T.2
  15. Dempír, J., Dohnal, L. (2005) Some robust procedures for determination of mean values and deviation of data and their usage. Klin. Biochem. Metab. 13(34), 139–144. (in Czech) Diabetes Care. 2004 May; 27(5):1047-53.
  16. Evaluation and comparison of 10 glucose methods and the reference method recommended in the proposed product class standard (1974). Clin. Chem. 23, 131–139. Sacks, D. B. (2006) Carbohydrates.
  17. Evaluation of Glucose Oxidase and Hexokinase Methods Mrs. Kavitha Ayyanar1, Dr. Suresh Pichandi2*, Janakiraman P3. International Journal of Biotechnology and Biochemistry ISSN 0973-2691 Volume 14, Number 1 (2018) pp. 51-58 © Research India Publications http://www.ripublication.com
  18. Giampletro, O., Pilo, A., Buzzigoli, G., Boni, C., Navalesi, R. (1982) Four methods for glucose assay for various glucose concentrations and under different clinical conditions. Clin. Chem. 28(12), 2405–2407.
  19. Global prevalence of diabetes: estimates for the year 2000 and projections for 2030.
  20. healthy adults from metropolitan region (Nairobi) of Kenya .International Journal of  Health
  21. Hye Soon Kim(2016). Blood Glucose Measurement: Is Serum Equal to Plasma? journal of diabetes metabolism. 40(5)
  22. In: Tietz Textbook of Clinical Chemistry and Molecular Diagnostics, 4th Edition, eds. Burtis, C. A., Ashwood, E. R., Bruns, D. E., pp. 37–901, Elsevier Saunders, St. Louis.
  23. Jia KK and Zhang J.(2010). Evaluation of five routine glucose methods on an Olympus AU5400 analyzer using the CDC hexokinase reference method. Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory  48(3):361-4
  24. Waithaka, S.K, Njagi, E.N, Ngeranwa, J.N, Muturi, D.M,, Chiuri B.M, Njagi .LJ, Gatua, K.G Wild S, Roglic G, Green A, Sicree R, King H

Corresponding Author

Joyce M. Gachoki

Medical Laboratory Science Postgraduate

Research Performed at Jomo Kenyatta University of Agriculture and Technology, College of Health Sciences, School of Biomedical Sciences, P.O Box 62000-00200,

Tel; 067-53-52711, 52181/4 Ext; 4071/2, Fax; 067-52164 Thika, Email: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.