Title: An Audit on Abdominal Trauma

Authors: Ramanauj Mukherjee, Shreya Poddar, Arup Mohanta, Asutosh Nayek, Divyendu Goutam

 DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.18535/jmscr/v6i12.42

Abstract

Background: One of the most frequently occurring surgical emergency is Blunt Abdominal Trauma, and has a strong association with high rates of mortality or morbidity. Being the leading cause of disability it poses a huge burden on the individual and the society, both mentally and financially. Even Though Liver and Spleen are the most commonly affected organs many patients present with polytrauma without distinctive signs and symptoms. Such cases, without, proper equipments, for diagnosis, highly efficient and quick managerial techniques could even lead to fatal results.

Materials and Methods: A descriptive longitudinal study was carried out on three hundred and fifty one patients who presented to the hospital .with signs of trauma. The patients were studied over six months. This study aims at assessing various presentations in cases of abdominal trauma and management systems that can control these situations.

Results: With a high segment of as much as 32 percent, accelerating injuries was found to be the most prominent mechanism of injury. Liver was the most commonly injured organ followed by spleen. Injuries to the genitourinary system, small and large bowel as well as bony injuries were also frequently present.

Keywords: solid organ trauma, road traffic injuries, abdominal trauma, accelerating, injuries management.

References

  1. Park K Textbook of Preventive And Social Medicine 22nd edition page no 374-375
  2. Townsend C M, Beauchamp R D, Evers B M, Mattox K L; Sabiston Textbook of Surgery, 19th. Ed; Philadelphia: Saunders; 2012. p 455-467.
  3. Advanced Trauma And Life Support, student course manual, 8th edition page 115-125
  4. M Mokhopadhyay: Intestinal injury from blunt abdominal trauma: a study of 47 cases. Oman Medical journal 2009, vol 24, Issue 4, October 2009
  5. Ministry of Health and Family Welfare. Integrated Disease Surveillance Project- Project Implementation Plan 2004-2009. New Delhi: Government of India; 2004:1-182
  6. Davis JJ, Cohn I, Nance, FC. Diagnosis and management of blunt abdominal trauma. Ann Gurg 1976: 183;672-677.
  7. Olinde HDH. Non penetrating wounds of the abdomen: a report of 47 cases with review of the literature, South Med J 1960:53;12701272.
  8. Drapanas T, McDonald J. Peritoneal tap in abdominaltrauma. Surgery 1961:50:742-744
  9. Haynes CD, Gunn, CH, Martin JD. Colon injuries Arch Surg. 1968:96; 944-948.
  10. Fitzergald JF, Crawford ES, DeBakey MD. Surgical considerations of non-perentrating abdominal injuries.
  11. Roman E, Silva, YJ, Lucas, C. Management of Blunt duodenal. Injury Surg Gynecol Obstet 1971:132.
  12. Cusheri A Giles,G R Moosa A R Essential surgical practice 1998. p 263- 304
  13. Stawicki SP, Trends in nonoperative management of traumatic injuries: A synopsis.
  14. Schwab CW. Selection of nonoperative management candidates. World J Surg 2001.
  15. Ozturk H, Dokucu AI, et al. Nonoperative Management of Isolated Solid Organ Injuries.
  16. Scalea TM, Rodriguez A, et al. Focussed Assessment with Sonography for Trauma.
  17. Jurkovich GJ, Carrico CJ. Trauma: Management of the acutely injured patient. In: Sabiston DC Jr, et al., editor. Textbook of Surgery. NOIDA: Thomson Press (India) Ltd; 1997; pp. 296-337.
  18. Weledji EP1* and Tambe J2 Department of Surgery, University of Buea, Cameroon 2Imaging Centre, Regional Hospital, Cameroon; Perspectives on the management of abdominal trauma; Austin journal  of surgery.

Corresponding Author

Dr Ramanauj Mukherjee

Address: 1, Khudiram Bose Sarani, Kolkata 700004. West Bengal, India

Phone: 9883129894, Email: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.