Title: A Paper on Clinical Significance of Cervical Insufficiency in Bad Obstetric History

Authors: Dr Vinodkumar Suresh Basavaradder, Dr Ratana Usham, Prof. Ng. Indrakumar Singh

 DOI:  https://dx.doi.org/10.18535/jmscr/v6i11.24

Abstract

Background: Death of a fetus in-utero or at birth has always been devastating and painful experience for the mother and of concerned in clinical practice. Perinatal mortality remains a challenge in the care of pregnant women worldwide particularly for those who had history of adverse outcome in previous pregnancies. For the modern obstetrician, the cervical insufficiency represents a controversial problem as the treatment modalities for the same have changed with time since its description and there is no clear cut diagnosing criteria for the diagnosis and hence there is need for the presumptive diagnosis of cervical insufficiency in women with recurrent pregnancy losses after ruling out all possible causes and usefulness of cervical encerclage operation in management of cervical insufficiency.

Result: The three pregnant women who presented to Gynaec OPD at around 16-18 weeks of gestation with history of recurrent pregnancy loss during 2nd trimester and early 3rd trimester were provisionally diagnosed to have cervical insufficiency based on clinical history and in all three women prophylactic encerclage procedure was done. Two were delivered at term and one at 34 weeks of gestation. All three newborn babies were healthy with no complications postpartum.

Conclusion: Recurrent miscarriages may increase psychological stress. Managing recurrent pregnancy loss should be individualised. By using the correct weapon, required target can be achieved. In our case series all patients provisionally diagnosed to have cervical insufficiency, were treated with prophylactic encerclage (McDonald procedure). Above said intervention led to fruitful outcome of all three pregnancy.

Keywords: Cervical insufficiency, Cervical circlage, McDonald procedure, Shirodkar procedure.

References

  1. Norwitz ER RJ, Greene M. Cervical Cerclage-elective and emergent. ACOG Update. 1999;24:1-11.
  2. Slattery MM, Morrison JJ. Preterm delivery. Lancet. 2002;360 (9344):1489–1497.
  3. Easterday CL, Reid DE. The incompetent cervix in repetitive abortion and premature labor. N Engl J Med. 1959,260:687-690.
  4. Kaufman RH. Structural changes of the genital tract associated with in utero exposure to diethylstilbestrol. Obstet Gynecol Annu. 1982;11:187–202.
  5. Anum EA, Hill LD, Pandya A, Strauss JF. Connective tissue and related disorders and preterm birth: clues to genes contributing to prematurity. Placenta. 2009;30(3):207–215.
  6. Berghella V TJ, Kuhlman K, Weiner S, Bolognese RJ, Wapner RJ. Cervical ultrasonography compared with manual examination as a predictor of preterm delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1997;177(4):723–730.
  7. Vyas NA, Vink JS, Ghidini A. Risk factors for cervical insufficiency after term delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2006;195 (3):787–791.
  8. Donders GG, Van Calsteren C, Bellen G. Association between abnormal vaginal flora and cervical length as risk factors for preterm birth. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2010.
  9. Page EW. Incompetent internal os of the cervix causing late abortion and premature labor; technic for surgical repair. Obstet Gynecol 1958;12:509-515.
  10. Bergman P, Svennerud S. Traction test for demonstrating incompetence of the internal os of the cervix. Int J Fertil 1957;2:163-167.
  11. Goldenberg RL IJ, Miodovnik M, Van Dorsten JP. The preterm prediction study: risk factors in twin gestations. National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Maternal-Fetal Medicine Units Network. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1996;175:1047–1053.
  12. Heath VC, Southall TR, Souka AP, Elisseou A, Nicolaides KH. Cervical length at 23 weeks of gestation: prediction of spontaneous preterm delivery. Ultra-sound Obstet Gynecol. 1998;12:312-317.
  13. McDonald IA. Suture of the cervix for inevitable miscarriage. J Obstet Gynaecol Br Emp. 1957;64:346-350.
  14. Shirodkar VN. A new method of operative treatment for habitual abortions in the second trimester of pregnancy. Antiseptic 1955;52 299-300
  15. Hefner JD, Patow WE, Ludwig JM, JR. A new surgical procedure for the correction of the incompetent cervix during pregnancy. The Wurm procedure. Obstet Gynecol 1961;18:616-20.
  16. Benson RC, Durfee RB. Trans abdominal cervico uterine cerclage during pregnancy for the treatment of cervical incompetency. Obstet Gynecol 1965;25:145-155.

Corresponding Author

Dr Vinodkumar Suresh Basavaradder

Postgraduate Trainee, Obstetrics and Gynaecology, JNIMS, Imphal, Manipur, India