Details
Category: Volume 06 Issue 07 July 2018
Hits: 1491

Title: A Comparative Study of Fetal Weight Estimation at Term by Clinical Method and Ultrasonography

Authors: Dr Sachin Singh Yadav, Dr Prachi Singh, Dr Shweta Yadav

 DOI:  https://dx.doi.org/10.18535/jmscr/v6i7.118

Abstract

Background: Fetal weight estimation is an important factor for decisions about the delivery mode and the timing of labor induction specially at term birth weight is a major determinant of infant mortality in first year of life and mortality rate is more sensitive to birth weight than gestational age.

Objectives: Assessment of fetal weight at term pregnancy by Clinical method and Ultrasonography (USG) and compare the accuracy of each with the birth weight.

Study design:-A prospective study was conducted in the Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology & Department of Radiology, in TMMC & RC Moradabad, over a period of 12 months.

Material & Methods: 100 pregnant women between gestational ages 37 to 40 weeks who were admitted in the ward for delivery were included in the study. After taking Informed consent detailed history and clinical examination was done as per pretested proforma. The actual birth weight was compared with the in-utero fetal weight estimated by symphysiofundal height (SFH) measurement using Johnsons Formula and ultrasonographic Hadlock’s formula.

Results: In our study the fetal weight estimation by clinical method and ultrasound was comparable to the actual birth weight. Estimated fetal weight (EFW) by Ultrasound offers no advantage over clinician’s EFW when performed during late pregnancy or labour. An EFW should be recorded in the assessment of all patients who are at term and again when they are in labour, with full awareness of the limitations of the methods for making such estimates. The estimation of fetal weight by SFH measurement is useful alternative, where USG is not available or affordable. This simple method of fetal weight estimation is useful particularly in remote areas where there is shortage of experienced medical personnel and to decide the mode of delivery and place of delivery.

Keywords: SFH, Johnsons Formula, Hadlock’s Formula, Estimated Fetal Weight (EFW), Actual Birth Weight.

References

  1. Steer P, Alam MA, Wadsworth J, Welch Relation between maternal haemoglobin concentration and birth weight in different ethnic groups.BMJ. 1995; 310(6978):489-91.
  2. Williams I, Cunningham GC, Haines WE, Norris FD, Tashiro M. Fetal growth and perinatal viability in California.Obstet. Gynaecol.1982;59 (5):624-32.
  3. Chauhan SP et al. Limitations of clinical and sonographic estimates of birth weight: experience with 1,034 parturients. J Obstet Gynecol. 1998; 91:72–7.
  4. Kurmanavicius J et al. Ultrasonographic fetal weight estimation:accuracy of formulas and accuracy of examiners by birthweight from 500 to 5000 Journal of perinatal medicine, 2004; 32:155–61.
  5. Ratanasiri T et Comparison of the accuracy of ultrasonic fetalweight estimation by using the various equations. J Med Assoc Thai. 2002; 85:962–7.
  6. Jolly MC, Sebire NJ, Harris JP, Regan  L,  Robinson S. Risk factors for     macrosomia and its clinical consequences: a study of 350,311 Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol.2003;111(1):9-14.
  7. Coomarasamy A, Connock M, Thornton J, Khan Accuracy of ultrasoundbiometry in the prediction of macrosomia: a systematic quantitative review. BJOG 2005;112(11): 1461-1466.
  8. Shamley KT, Landon Accuracy and modifyingfactors for ultrasonographic determination offetal weight at term. J Obstet Gynecol1994;84:926-930.
  9. Ben-Haroush A et al. Accuracy of sonographically estimatedfetal weight in 840 women with different pregnancy complicationsprior to induction of Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2004, 23(2):172–176.
  10. Shittu AS, Kuti O, Orji EO, Makinde NO, Ogunniyi S, Ayoola o.et al. Clinical versus Sonographic Estimation of Foetal Weight in Southwest J HEALTH POPUL NUTR. 2007;25(1):14-23
  11. Woo JS, Ngan HY, AuKK et al. “Estimation of fetal  weight in utero  from symphysis  - fundal height and abdominal girth measurements” Br J Obstet Gynecol. 1979;86(12):722-728
  12. Mhaskar R, MhaskarA, Molly SR. Symphysiofundal height (SFH) measurement for prediction of birth weight-A new formula. J Obstet Gynecol. 2001;51:73-76.
  13. Fatemeh Ghaemmaghami MD, A sharaf Jamal MD, Mohammed Reza Soleimani MD et al. - “ Parturient fundal height and birth weight estimation”. Arch Iranian Med 2002; 5(2):80-
  14. Rajyashri Sharma, Namrata A, Bharwaj -“Use of Johnson’sformula in HCH training” J Obstet Gynaecol of 2002;53(3):44-50
  15. Hendrex NW, Grady CS, Chauhan SP Clinical sonographic estimate of birth weight in term parturients. A randomized clinical trial.J Reprod Med. 2000;45 (4):317-322
  16. Sherman DJ, Joseph SA, Torbin A comparison of clinical and ultrasonic estimation of fetal weight. Obstet Gynecol.1998; 91(2):212-217
  17. Titapant v, Chawan PS, Mingnitpatanakul Comparison of clinical and ultrasound estimation of fetal weight. J Med Assoc Thai .2001;84:1251-1257.
  18. Baum JD, Gussman D, Wirth JC. Clinical and patient estimation of fetal weight versus ultrasound estimation. J Repord 2002;57(9):558-559.

Corresponding Author

Dr Prachi Singh

G 203, Faculty Block, TMU, Moradabad (UP), India

Mobile no:-8218770640, Email: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.