Title: Role of Imprint Cytology in the Diagnosis of Malignant Lesions- A Hospital Based Study

Authors: Shivani Gandhi, Arvind Khajuria, K.C. Goswami

 DOI:  https://dx.doi.org/10.18535/jmscr/v6i7.48

Abstract

Background: Imprint cytology is a simple, cost effective and rapid procedure for the diagnosis of various malignant lesions. However histopathological examination remains the gold standard for the diagnosis of the malignant lesions.

Methods: The present study consisted of 100 resected specimen received in the department of pathology over the period of 18 months from May 2016 to November 2017. Imprints were made by touching the clean glass slides over the involved area of the resected specimen and smears were stained with Papanicolaou (PAP) stain.

Results: The present study included 47% were males and 53% were females.  Out of the total 100 specimen, 78% were found to be malignant and remaining 22% were benign. The accuracy of the imprint cytology for the diagnosis of malignant lesions was found to be 90% and for benign lesions it was 100%.

Conclusion: Imprint cytology is a cheap and rapid method for the diagnosis of malignant lesions.

Keywords: Imprint cytology, Malignant lesions.

References

  1. Harnish B, Nidhi V, Neena D. Usefulness of touch Imprint Cytology in Cancer diagnosis: A study of 119 cases. Int Res J Medical Ssi. 2014: 2(10); 19-25.
  2. Mangia, Anita, Chiriatti, Annalisa, Chiarappa et al. touch Imprint Cytology in tumour banks for the Confirmation of Neoplastic Cellularity and for DNA Extraction. Arch Pathol Lab Med, 2008: 132; 974-78.
  3. AI Rikabi AC and AI Sohaibani M. Intraoperative cytology and frozen sections of breast lesions: A comparison from Saudi teaching hospital. Bahrain Med Bull, 1996: 18(1).
  4. Hahn PF, Eisenberg PJ, Pitman MB, Gazelle GS and Mueller PR. Cytopathologic Touch Preparations (Imprints) from Core Needle Biopsies: Accuracy Compared with that of Fine Needle Aspirates. AJR, 1995: 165; 1277-79.
  5. Shirley SE, Escoffery CT. Usefulness of touch Preparation Cytology in Post mortem Diagnosis: A study from University Hospital of West Indies. Internet Journal of Pathology, 2005: 2(3).
  6. Gore CR, Singh BK, Chandanwale SS, Gurwale SG, Kumar H, Bawikar R et al. imprint cytology: A boon in tissue diagnosis. Medical Journal of Dr. D.Y. Patil Vidyapeeth, 2017: 10(1); 58-63.
  7. Orki A, Tezel C, Kosar A, Ersev AA, Dudu C, Arman B. Feasibility of imprint cytology for evaluation of mediastinal lymph nodes in lung cancer. Jpn J Clin Oncol, 2006: 36; 76-9.
  8. Walker E and Going JJ. Cytopathology in the post mortem room. J Clin Pathol, 1994: 47(8); 714-17.
  9. Suen KC, Wood WS, Syed AA, Quenville NF and Clement PB. Role of imprint cytology in intraoperative diagnosis: Value and limitations. Acta Cytol, 1978: 22(3); 133-7.
  10. Mavec P. Cytologic diagnosis from tumor tissue using the “quick method” during operation. Acta Cytol, 1967: 11(3); 229-30.

Corresponding Author

Dr Shivani Gandhi

Post Graduate, Department of Pathology,

Acharya Shri Chander College of Medical Science & Hospital, Sidhra, Jammu (J&K), India

Email: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it., Phone: +91-9796651403