Details
Category: Volume 06 Issue 05 May 2018
Hits: 1036

Title: Ultrasonographic and Mammographic Evaluation of Breast Lesions

Authors: Dr M. Padmavathi, Dr D. Sudhakar Babu, Dr V. Sailaja

 DOI:  https://dx.doi.org/10.18535/jmscr/v6i5.113

Abstract

The Study was done in 200 female patients with various breast lesions by using six parameters. In the study of incidence of breast lesions in relation with age it was found that the vulnerable age groups for the different lesions of breast were between 40-49, 50-59 years. Regarding the site of lesion, the author found the upper outer quadrant was vulnerable for all types of lesions especially in left side. Comparing the accuracy of diagnostic procedure of mammography and ultrasonography, the mammogram showed only 86% accuracy with some false positive cases, whereas ultrasonography showed high percentage of accuracy, and also was simplest technique, comparatively cheaper and so widely used over the mammogram.

Keywords: Mammogram, ultrasonogram, breast lesion, incidence, diagnostic accuracy.

References

  1. Gray’s Anatomy – Normal Anatomy 38th edition, page no 418-424.
  2. Mahesh K. Shetty, Prospective evaluation of the value of combined MG & USG assessment in patients with palpable abnormalities of the breast. J ultrasound Med, 22:263-268, 2003.
  3. Sachin Prasad N,A comparison of mammography and ultrasonography in the evaluation of breast masses. Biomed papmed Fac unicpalacky Olomouc czehrepub. 151(2):315-322, 2007.
  4. Sandhya P Iyer, Epidemiology of Benign Breast diseases in females of child bearing age group:http://bhj.org/journal/2000-4201.
  5. Katsaros, Comparison of mammography, ultrasonography & nuclear scintigraphy in the detection of malignant breast lesions. Journal of the American Chiropractic association Dec2002.
  6. Janardhan V Bhatt, Pathophysiology of breast lesions: vision beyond the clinical eye. 2002.
  7. Mona A,Outline of Breast diseases in Qatif Central Hospital. Kuwait Medical Journal, 36(3): 182-185, 2004
  8. Raafta, Sensitivity of Scintimammography for diagnosis of breast carcinoma in different breast sites 99 Mtc --sestemibi scintimammagraphy. Effect of lesion site size and Cancer inst. Vol.12, No.3, sept, 183-189 ;2000.
  9. ShozoOhsuni,Breast biopsy for mammographically detected nonpalpable lesions using a vaccum assisted biopsy device and an upright type stereotactic mammography. Japanese Journal of clinical oncology, 2001.
  10. Noriyuki Tohnosu, A comparison between USG and MG, computed tomography and digital subtraction angiography for the detection of breast cancers. Surgery today :0941-1291:1436-2813, volume 23, No.81, pages 704-710, August 1993.
  11. Nasu S,A study of breast cancer undetectable by USG and MG. Health evaluation and promotion; YO267A:1347-0086. Vol.30:No: 4 page.436-438;2003.
  12. Hiecken TJ, Correlating USG, MG and pathology in the assessment of breast cancer size. AM J surg;182:351-4, 2001.
  13. COX BA Kelly, Ultrasound characteristics of breast carcinoma. AM Surg,Oct:64 (10):934-8; 1995.

Corresponding Author

Dr M. Padmavathi

Government Medical College, Adilabad, Telangana, India