Title: Bolton Ratios in Crowded and Non-Crowded Dentition among Solapur Population: An In-vitro Study

Authors: Dr Sukumar Vitthal Lipare, Dr Sunilkumar P., Dr Chandrashekhar Gouda B. Patil, Dr Akash B. Lavate, Dr Prashant J. Yaragamblimath, Dr Sneha V. Hoshing

 DOI:  https://dx.doi.org/10.18535/jmscr/v6i3.67

Abstract

Introduction: It has been seen that specific dimensional relationship must exist between the maxillary and mandibular teeth to ensure proper inter digitation, overbite and overjet. The purpose of this study is to compare bolton ratios in crowded and non-crowded dentition.

Materials and Methods: Out of the 60 cases, 30 were non-crowded cases and the rest 30 were crowded cases. Carey’s Arch perimeter analysis was done on the patient casts. The arch length anterior to the first permanent molar was measured using a soft brass wire. The mesiodistal width of the teeth anterior to the first molars (second premolar to second premolar) was measured and summed up. The discrepancy referred to the difference between arch length and tooth material. Presence of difference (AL-TTM) greater than 2mm in both arches was considered as a non-crowded case and difference (AL-TTM) less than 2mm was considered as a crowded case. Mesiodistal width of each tooth was measured using digital Vernier caliper. Tooth width ratios were calculated in the two groups using formulas proposed by Bolton.

Results:  No significant difference was found in the anterior and overall ratio between crowded and non-crowded dentitions between both males and females.

Conclusion: This study concluded that not much differences was found between Bolton’s ratio and the ratios for the Solapur population. Crowded or non-crowded dentition did not show any difference in the ratio while the crowded dentition showed larger teeth in the mesio-distal dimension. When males & females were compared, the ratio did not vary considerably.

Keywords: Bolton Ratios, Bolton discrepancy.

References

  1. Sanjay Naduwinmani, Jyosna Preetham Naduwinmani, U.S.Krishna Nayak.  Evaluation Of Bolton’s Tooth Width Ratios In Crowded And Non-Crowded Dentitions Among The South Indian Population: An In-vitro Study,IJCD DECEMBER 2010 ;1(3):99-106.
  2. Dr Karan Purohit et al. Clinical Significance of Bolton’s Ratio in Crowded and Non-crowded Dentition With Gender Variations. JANUARY 2016 ;6(1): 560-563.
  3. Lundstrom A. Intermaxillary tooth width ratio and tooth nalignment and occlusion. Acta Odontol Scand. 1955; 12:265–292.
  4. Bolton WA. Disharmony In tooth size and its relation to the analysis and treatment of malocclusion. Angle Orthod 1958; 28:113– 130.
  5.  Bolton WA. The clinical application of tooth-size analysis. Am J Orthod 1962; 48:504–529.
  6. Fastlicht J. Crowding of mandibular incisors. Am J Orthod 1970; 58:156–163.
  7.  Norderval K, Wisth PJ, BoeOE. Mandibular anterior crowding in relation to tooth size and craniofacial morphology. Scand J Dent Res 1975; 83:267–273.
  8.  Doris JM, Bernard BW, Kuftinec MM, Stom D. A biometric study of tooth size and dental crowding. Am J Orthod 1981; 79:326– 336.
  9. Adams CP. A comparison of 15 year old children with excellent occlusion and with crowding of the teeth, Angle Class I maloc- clusion, in respect of face size and shape and tooth size. Swed Dent J Suppl 1982; 15:11–26.
  10. Dr Smith RJ, Davidson WM, Gipe DP. Incisor shape and incisor crowding: a re-evaluation of the Peck and Peck ratio. Am J Orthod 1982; 82:231–235.
  11. Chang HF, Shiau YY, Chen KC. The relationship of dental crowd- ing to tooth size, dental arch width, and arch depth. Proc Natl Sci Counc Repub China B 1986; 10:229–235.
  12.  Yoshihara T, Matsumoto Y, Suzuki J, Sato N, Oguchi H. Effect of serial extraction alone on crowding: relationships between tooth width, arch length, and crowding. . Am J Orthod 1999; 116:691–696.
  13.  Eduardo Bernabe´, Karla M. Villanueva, Carlos Flores-Mir. Tooth Width Ratios in Crowded and Noncrowded Dentitions, Angle Orthod 2004;74:765–768.
  14. Crosby Dr, Alexander CG. The occurrence of tooth size discrepancies among different malocclusion groups. Am J Orthod 1989; 95:457-61.
  15. A1-Tamimi T, Hayder A. Hashim. Bolton tooth size ratio revisited. World J Orthod 2005; 6:289-295
  16. Profit WR. Contemporary orthodontics, 3rd Edn. St Louis: Mosby, 2000; 170.

Corresponding Author

Dr Sukumar Vitthal Lipare

529 / A, plot No. 24/ A, Kamathipura, Satara-415001 Maharashtra

Telephone No.– 02162- 222663, Mobile No.- 08087944191