Title: Bacteriological profile in various types of ulcers -A comparative study from a tertiary care centre in North Kerala

Authors: Dr Akhila Aravind, Dr Joana Mary Magdaline, Dr Joseph Francis

 DOI:  https://dx.doi.org/10.18535/jmscr/v6i3.35

Abstract

Ulcers especially chronic ulcers pose a significant health care burden worldwide. The non- healing of such ulcers could be due to multiple factors among which bacterial infections are the forerunners. The present study was undertaken for a period of 1 year from February 2015 to know the prevalence of various types of chronic ulcers in our locality as well as to compare the flora obtained from the various types of ulcers. We had identified diabetic foot ulcers as the most prevalent type among the study population followed by venous ulcer s& decubitus ulcers. On comparison of pattern of flora of the above types of ulcers in our study it was observed that all of them had a predominant monomicrobial infection with equal proportions of Gram positive & Gram negative isolates, but there was diversity in the individual isolates from different types of ulcers.

Keywords: Chronic ulcers, diabetic ulcers, venous ulcers, decubitus ulcers, bacterial flora

References

  1. Patricia .M. Tille, Bailey and Scott’s Diagnostic microbiology, 13th Edition , Mosby/Elsevier : 961
  2. Kirketerp-Møller K, Zulkowski K, James G. Chronic Wound Colonization, Infection, and Biofilms. In: Bjarnsholt T, Jensen PØ, Moser C, Høiby N, editors. Biofilm Infec-tions [Internet]. New York, NY: Springer New York; 2011 [cited 2016 Jun 26]. p. 11–24. Available from: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-1-4419-6084-9_2
  3. Agale SV. Chronic Leg Ulcers: Epidemiology, Aetiopathogenesis, and Management. Ulcers. 2013:1–9
  4. de Souza JM, Vieira EC, Cortez TM, Mondelli AL, Miot HA, Abbade LPF. Clinical and microbiologic evaluation of chronic leg ulcers: a cross-sectional study. Adv Skin Wound Care. 2014;27(5):222–227.
  5. Renuka Sharma, R K Sharma, Pradeep Goyal, Ashok Sharma, Monique Suresh, Saurav. Review of chronic leg ulcers over a period of one year in a tertiary care hospital in North India. Sch. J. App. Med. Sci., 2016; 4(4D):1392-1397
  6. Bowler PG, Duerden BI, Armstrong DG. Wound Microbiology and Associated Approaches to Wound Management. ClinMicrobiol Rev. 2001 Apr 1;14(2):244–69.
  7. Zubair M, Malik A, Ahmad J, Rizvi M, Farooqui KJ, Rizvi MW. A study of biofilm production by gram negative organisms isolated from diabetic foot ulcer patients. Biol Med. 2011;3(2):147–57.
  8. Zhao G, Usui ML, Lippman SI, James GA, Stewart PS, Fleckman P, et al. Biofilms and Inflammation in Chronic Wounds. Adv Wound Care. 2013 Sep;2(7):389–99.
  9. Smith DM, Snow DE, Rees E, Zischkau AM, Hanson JD, Wolcott RD, et al. Evaluation of the bacterial diversity of Pressure ulcers using bTEFAPpyrosequencing. BMC Med Genomics. 2010 Sep 21;3:41.
  10. Davies CE, Hill KE, Wilson MJ, Stephens P, Hill CM, Harding KG, et al. Use of 16S Ribosomal DNA PCR and Denaturing Gradient Gel Electrophoresis for Analysis of the Microfloras of Healing and Nonhealing Chronic Venous Leg Ulcers. J ClinMicrobiol. 2004 Aug 1;42(8):3549–57.
  11. Marie S. Tuttle. Association Between Microbial Bioburden and Healing Outcomes in Venous Leg Ulcers: A Review of the Evidence. Wound Heal Soc. Advances In Wound Care, Volume 4, Number 1.
  12. Reddy M, Gill SS, Wu W, Kalkar SR, Rochon PA. Does This Patient Have an Infection of a Chronic Wound? JAMA. 2012 Feb 8;307 (6):605–11.
  13. D. Isenberg, Clinical Microbiology Procedures Handbook, American Society for Microbiologists, Volume 1 :1.16.4.
  14. Washington Winn Jr, Allen S, William Janda, Koneman E, Gary Procop, Schrekenberger P, et al. Koneman’sColor Atlas and Textbook of Diagnostic Microbiology. 6th ed. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins: 96
  15. Perim MC, Borges J da C, Celeste SRC, Orsolin E de F, Mendes RR, Mendes GO, et al. Aerobic bacterial profile and antibiotic resistance in patients with diabetic foot infections. Rev Soc Bras Med Trop. 2015 Oct;48(5):546–554.
  16. Nair S, Rajan R, Lalithabhai SD. A clinicomicrobiological study of diabetic foot ulcers from South Kerala. J AcadClinMicrobiol. 2015;17(2):94.
  17. Zubair M, Malik A, Ahmad J, others. Clinico-bacteriology and risk factors for the diabetic foot infection with multidrug resistant microorganisms in north India. Biol Med. 2010;2(4):22–34.
  18. Tiwari S, Pratyush DD, Dwivedi A, Gupta SK, Rai M, Singh SK. Microbiological and clinical characteristics of diabetic foot infections in northern India. J Infect DevCtries. 2012;6(4):329–332.
  19. Chellan G, Shivaprakash S, Karimassery Ramaiyar S, Varma AK, Varma N, Thekkeparambil Sukumaran M, et al. Spectrum and Prevalence of Fungi Infecting Deep Tissues of Lower-Limb Wounds in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes. J ClinMicrobiol. 2010 Jun 1;48(6):2097–102.
  20. Dowd SE, Sun Y, Secor PR, Rhoads DD, Wolcott BM, James GA, et al. Survey of bacterial diversity in chronic wounds using Pyrosequencing, DGGE, and full ribosome shotgun sequencing. BMC Microbiol. 2008;8(1):43.
  21. Daltrey DC, Rhodes B, Chattwood JG. Investigation into the microbial flora of healing and non-healing decubitus ulcers. J ClinPathol. 1981;34(7):701–705.
  22. Smith DM, Snow DE, Rees E, Zischkau AM, Hanson JD, Wolcott RD, et al. Evaluation of the bacterial diversity of Pressure ulcers using b TEFAP pyrosequencing. BMC Med Genomics. 2010 Sep 21;3:41

Corresponding Author

Dr Akhila Aravind

Senior Resident, Department of Microbiology,

Govt. Medical College, Ernakulam, Kerala, India