Title: A Study of Clinical Presentation and Accuracy of the Scoring System (Based on Boey) in Predicting postoperative Morbidity and Mortality of Perforated Peptic Ulcers

Authors: Dr Sudha Dhiyanesh.R, Dr Ashok Swaminathan.G, Prof. Dr C.S.Subramanian, Dr Achyutha Krishnan.T

 DOI:  https://dx.doi.org/10.18535/jmscr/v5i11.96

Abstract

Background: To evaluate the postoperative outcomes of perforated peptic ulcers(PPU)using Boey scoring system.

Materials and Methods: All patients who were operatedfor perforated peptic ulcers during the study period in our hospital. Boey scoring done preoperatively and surgical outcomes were interpreted. All patients were taken up for emergency laparatomy after informed consent and closure of the perforation done.

Result: The study consists of about 104 patients with the mean age being 43yrs and 88% found to be males. Overall mortality was found to be around 10% and morbidity around 35%. Both morbidity and mortality increased with increase in Boey score: 0%, 5%, 24% and 40% mortality for the scores 0,1,2 and 3 respectively. 25%, 35%, 62% and 100% morbidity for scores 0,1,2 and 3 respectively.

Conclusion: Although many scoring systems are available to stratify risks in PPU, Boey scoring system found to be an easy and useful predictor for estimating postoperative mortality and morbidity with three simple parameters.

Keywords: Perforation, peptic ulcer, Boey score, perforated ulcer, peritonitis.

References

  1. Lohsiriwat et al. Perforated Peptic Ulcer: Clinical Presentation, Accuracy of the Boey Scoring System in Predicting Postoperative Morbidity and Mortality. World J Surg (2009) 34:80-85
  2. Boey J, Choi S, Poon et al: Risk stratification in perforated peptic ulcers. A prospective validation of predictive factors.AnnSurg 1987;205(1):22–26
  3. Predicting mortality and morbidity of patients operated on for perforated peptic ulcers.Lee F, Leung L, Lai S, Ng SS, Dexter S, Lau WY.Department of Surgery, The University of Hong Kong, Shatin, New Territories, Hong Kong, China.Arch Surg. 2001;136(1):90-93. doi:10.1001/archsurg.136.1.90
  4. Factors influencing mortality in perforated peptic ulcer following emergencysurgical repair.JNMA Nepal Med Assoc. 2006 Jan-Mar; 46(165):31-5.
  5. Jhobta RS, Attri AK, Kaushik R et al (2006) Spectrum of perforation peritonitis in India-review of 504 consecutive cases. World J Emerg Surg 1:2617.
  6. Sharma Smita S , Mamtani Manju, Sharma Mamata, Kulkarni Hemant.A prospective cohort study of postoperative complica-tions in the management of perforated peptic ulcer. Bio Med Central 2006,6:824.
  7. Subedi SK, Afaq A, Adhikari S et al. Factors influencing mortality in perforated duodenal ulcer following emergency surgical repair.JNMA J Nepal Med Assoc. 20(T/\Jan- Mar;46(165):31-5.
  8. Svanes , Lie R, Svanes K, Lie S, Søreide OAdverse effects of delayed treatmentfor perforated peptic ulcer.. Annals of surgery 1994; Vol. 220. No.2. 168-175
  9. Boey J, Wong J, Ong GB.Ann Surg. 1982 Mar;195(3):265-9.A prospective study of operative risk factors in perforated duodenal ulcers.A prospective study of operative risk factors in perforated duodenal ulcers.Boey J, Wong J, Ong GB.
  10. Kuipers EJ, Thijs JC, Festen HP. The prevalence of Helicobacter pylori in peptic ulcer disease. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 1995; 9 Suppl 2:59.
  11. Aro P, Storskrubb T, Ronkainen J, et al. Peptic ulcer disease in a general adult population: the Kalixanda study: a random population-based study. Am J Epidemiol 2006; 163:1025.
  12. Kurata JH. Epidemiology: Peptic ulcer risk factors.Semin Gastrointest Dis 1993; 4:2.
  13. Dutta AK, Chacko A, Balekuduru A, et al. Time trends in epidemiology of peptic ulcer disease in India over two decades. Indian J Gastroenterol 2012; 31:111.
  14. Tovey F. Peptic ulcer in India and Bangladesh. Gut 1979; 20:329.
  15. Chiorean MV, Locke GR 3rd, Zinsmeister AR, et al. Changing rates of Helicobacter pylori testing and treatment in patients with peptic ulcer disease. Am J Gastroenterol 2002; 97:3015.
  16. Huang JQ, Sridhar S, Hunt RH. Role of Helicobacter pylori infection and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs in peptic-ulcer disease: a meta-analysis. Lancet 2002; 359:14.
  17. Lanza FL, Chan FK, Quigley EM, Practice Parameters Committee of the American College of Gastroenterology. Guidelines for prevention of NSAID-related ulcer complications. Am J Gastroenterol 2009; 104:728.

Corresponding Author

Dr Sudha Dhiyanesh.R

Post graduate, Department of General Surgery,

Rajah Muthiah Medical college and Hospital,

Annamalai University, Annamalainagar- 608002