Title: A Study of Impact of Patient Education of Diabetes on His Knowledge, Attitude and Practices

Authors: Dr Sunita Gupta MD, Dr Mohit Singla MD, Dr Neeraj Gupta MBBS

 DOI:  https://dx.doi.org/10.18535/jmscr/v5i11.77

Abstract

Poor awareness among diabetic patients are some of the important variables influencing the progression of diabetes and its complications, which are largely preventable through education and involvement of the patient.

Objective: We evaluated the knowledge, attitude and practices in diabetic patients for diabetes mellitus and impact of the diabetic education on knowledge, attitude and practice(KAP) score.

Methods: The study was conducted among type 2 diabetic patients taken from O.P.D and indoor wards of M.M Institute of Medical Sciences and Research, Mullana, Ambala. A total of hundred diabetic patients were enrolled in the study and randomized into the test and control groups. Each group consisted of 50 patients. The patients in the test group received diabetic education and patient education leaflet at baseline and same was given to the control group at the end of the study. Knowledge, attitude and practices were evaluated  using a KAP questionnaire with maximum score of 25(knowledge14,attitude-5 and practices-6)

Results: In our study population, 59(59%) were males and 41(41%) were females. Majority of patients (62%) were between the ages 40-59 years and maximum number of patients (53%) had diabetes less than 5years.  Most of the patients (63%)were overweight. The mean knowledge, attitude and practices score at baseline was 6.52(46.57%), 2.26(45.2%) and 2.42(40.33%) respectively and mean KAP score was 11.21(44.84%). At baseline, mean knowledge, mean attitude and mean practice score was 6.56 ± 4.06, 2.24 ± 1.65 and 1.74 ± 1.26 in the control group respectively and 6.48 ± 4.49, 2.18 ± 1.36 and 3.1 ± 1.5 in the test group respectively. Mean KAP score at baseline was 10.46 ± 6.19 in the control group and 11.96 ± 6.84 in the test group. At final follow-up, mean knowledge, mean attitude and mean practice score was 7.12 ± 3.98, 2.24 ± 1.33 and 1.92 ± 1.34 in the control group respectively and 12.12 ± 2.12,4.12± 0.87 and 4.46 ± 1.01 in the test group respectively. Mean KAP score at final follow up was 11.36 ± 6.12 in the control group and 20.78 ± 3.13 in the test group. At baseline, mean RBS was 228.58 ± 83.58 mg/dl in the control group and 265.79 ± 130.76mg/dl  in the test group, whereas at final follow-up mean RBS was 175.56 ± 48.12mg/dl and in the control group and 152.06 ± 36.42mg/dl in the test group. We observed significant increase in knowledge, attitude and practice score (p<0.0001) and significant reduction in RBS (p<0.0007) after education in the test group as compared to the control group.

Conclusion: The results of this study suggested that diabetic patients had low levels of knowledge, attitude and practice for diabetes mellitus. The health education is vital in improving patient’s knowledge, attitude and practices regarding diabetes mellitus and attaining better glycemic control.

References

  1. Modh KM, Patel KM, Singh IA, Patel CN, Patel S. Impact of Clinical Pharmacist Intervention on Quality Of Life in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus. Int J Adv Pharm Res. 2011 Aug;2(8):451-60.
  2. Saadia Z, Rushdi S, Alsheha M, Saeed H, Rajab M. A study of knowledge, attitude and practices Of Saudi Women towards diabetes mellitus. A (KAP) study in Al-Qassim Region. The Internet Journal of Health. 2009;11(2).
  3. Lewis RK, Lasack NL, Lambert BL, Connor SE. Patient counseling--a focus on maintenance therapy. Am J Health Syst Pharm. 1997 Sep 15;54(18):2084-98.
  4. Renders CM, Valk GD, De Sonnaville JJ, Twisk J, Kreigsman DM, Heine RJ et al. Quality of care for patients with Type 2 diabetes mellitus--a long term comparison of two quality improvement programmes in Netherlands. Diabet Med. 2003 Oct;20(10):846-52.
  5. Via PS, Salyer J. Psychosocial self-efficacy and personal characteristics of veterans attending a diabetes education program. Diabetes Educ. 1999 Sep-Oct;25(5):727-37.
  6. Executive Summary: Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes-2014. American Diabetes Association. Diabetes Care. 2014 Jan;37 Suppl 1:S5-13.
  7. Park K. Nutrition and Health. In: Park K, editor. Park’s textbook of Preventive and Social Medicine, 20thed.Jabalpur: BanarsidasBhanot;2009. p. 526-80.
  8. Ng SH, Chan KH, Lian ZY, Chuah YH, Waseem An, Kadirvelu A. Reality vs Illusion: Knowledge, Attitude and Practice among Diabetic Patients. IJCRIMPH. 2012;4(5):723-32.
  9. Palaian S, Acharya LD, MadhvaRao PG, Shankar PR, Nair NM, Nair NP. Knowledge, Attitude, and Practice Outcomes: Evaluating the Impact of Counseling in Hospitalized Diabetic Patients in India. PharmacolTher. 2006 Jul;31(7):383-95.
  10. Malathy R, Narmadha MP, Ramesh S, Alvin JM, Dinesh BN. Effect of a diabetes counseling programme on knowledge, attitude and practice among diabetic patients in Erode district of South India. J Young Pharm. 2011 Jan-Mar;3(1):65–72.
  11. Marian AO, Joy IO. Knowledge, Attitudes and Practices of People with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus in a Tertiary Health Care Centre, Umuahia, Nigeria. J Diabetes Metab. 2012;3(3):187.
  12. Shah VN, Kamdar PK, Shah N. Assessing the knowledge, attitudes and practice of type 2 diabetes among patients of Saurashtra region, Gujarat. Int J DiabDevCtries. 2009 Jul-Aug;29(3):118-22
  13. Sharma B, Mahajan H, Gill N. Impact of health education on knowledge, attitude, self care practices and life style modification factors in diabetic patients. International Journal of General Medicine and Pharmacy (IJGMP). 2013 Jul;2(3):29-38.
  14. Upadhyay DK, Palaian S, Shankar PR, Mishra P. Knowledge, attitude and practice about diabetes among diabetes patients in Western Nepal. Rawal Med J. 2008;33:8-11.
  15. Puepet FH, Mijinyawa BB, Akogu I, AzaraI.Knowledge, Attitude and Practice of Patients with Diabetes Mellitus before and after Educational Intervention in Jos, Nigeria. The Journal of Medicine in the Tropics. 2007;9(1):3-10.
  16. Chhutto MA, Qadr HUR, Abro HA, Shaikh MA, Shaikh BA, Shaikh N et al. Awareness of Diabetes Mellitus and its Complications in Diabetic Patients. Med Channel. 2009 Oct-Dec;15(4):153-6.
  17. Hartayu TS, MI MI, Suryawati S. Improving of type 2 diabetic patients’ knowledge, attitude and practice towards diabetes self-care by implementing Community-Based Interactive Approach – Diabetes Mellitus Strategy. BMC Research Notes. 2012;5:315.
  18. Adepu R, Rasheed A, Nagavi BG. Effect of patient counseling on quality of life in type-2 diabetes mellitus patients in two selected South Indian community pharmacies: A study. Indian J Pharma Sci. 2007;69(4):519-24
  19. Mukhopadhyay P, Paul B, Das D, Sengupta N, Majumder R. Perceptions and Practices of type 2 diabetics: A cross- sectional study in a tertiary care hospital in Kolkata. Int J DiabDevCtries. 2010 Jul-Sep;30(3):143-9.
  20. Mazzuca SA, Moorman NH, Wheeler ML, Norton JA, Fineberg NS, Vinicor F et al. The diabetes education study: a controlled trial of the effects of diabetes patient education. Diabetes Care. 1986 Jan-Feb;9(1):1-10.
  21. Jaber LA, Halapy H, Fernet M, Tummalapalli S, Diwakaran H. Evaluation of a pharmaceutical care model on diabetes management. Ann Pharmacother.1996 Mar;30(3):238-43.
  22. Mehuys E, De Bolle L, Van Bortel L, Annemans L, Van Tongelen I, RemonJPet al. Medication use and disease manage-ment of type 2 diabetes in Belgium. Pharm World Sci. 2008 Jan;30(1):51-6.
  23. Karter AJ, Ackerson LM, Darbinian JA, D'Agostino RB Jr, Ferrara A, Liu Jet al. Self-monitoring of blood glucose levels and glycemic control: the Northern California Kaiser Permanente Diabetes registry. Am J Med. 2001 Jul;111(1):1-9.

Corresponding Author

Dr Sunita Gupta

B2 Near Shiv Mandir, MMU campus Mullana Ambala India

Email: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it., 91-9671023536