Title: A Study on Congenital Anomalies in Fetuses based on Educational and Socio-Economic Status of the Mother

Authors: Dr D.Sudhakar Babu, Dr V.Sailaja, Dr M.Padmavathi

 DOI:  https://dx.doi.org/10.18535/jmscr/v5i11.40

Abstract

Aims and Objectives: To assess the association of the various congenital malformations based on maternal education and socio-economic status.

Materials and Methods: Fetuses of pregnant women attending government hospitals in Hyderabad during the a period of one year from October 2011 to September 2012 were screened through ultrasonographic evaluation in the second trimester (12wks to 28wks) for congenital anomalies considering the maternal educational status and socio-economic status according to Kuppuswamy’s classification.

Results: The congenital anomalies are seen more affecting uneducated women of low socio-economic status in our study

Conclusion: congenital anomalies are more commonly seen in illiterate women & to prevent them more focus should be laid on maternal education, pre-marital councelling,antenatal care, supplementation with folic acid, prenatal ultrasonography & genetic studies in at-risk individuals.

Keywords: congenital defects, fetal anomalies, maternal education, socio-economic status,  prenatal ultrasonography

References

  1. Kumar et al (2007). Kuppuswamy's socioeconomic status scale-Updating for 2007. Indian J Pediatr; 74:1131-2.  
  2. Roya Mokhtari, Amrita Bagga (2003), ‘Consanguinity, genetic disorders and malformations in the Iranian population’. Acta Biologica Szegediensis Volume 47(1-4):47-50.
  3. Neelu A Desai, Avinash Desai (2006), Congenital Anomalies: A Prospective Study. Bombay Hospital Journal. July; 442-445.
  4. Amar Taksande, et.al (2010), Congenital malformations at birth in Central India: A rural medical college hospital based data. Indian J Hum Genet. Sep-Dec; 16(3): 159–163.
  5. Anupam Kaur and Jai Rup Singh (2010), Chromosomal Abnormalities: Genetic Disease Burden in India. Int J Hum Genet, 10(1-3): 1-14 .
  6. Mehrabi Kushki Msc, B. Zeyghami PhD (2005),The effect of Consanguineous Marriages on Congenital Malformation. Journal of Research in Medical Sciences; 10(5): 298-301
  7. G Long, A Sprigg (1998),A comparative study of routine versus selective fetal anomaly ultrasound scanning. J Med Screen; 5:6–10.
  8. Shama Munim, Salva Nadeem, Nadya Ali Khuwaja (2006), The Accuracy of Ultrasound in the Diagnosis of Congenital Abnormalities. J Pak Med Assoc. January; Vol. 56, No. 1: 16-18.
  9. Muhammad Nafees et.al (2006), Congenital Fetal Anomalies Antenatal Ultrasound Detection. www.paf mj.org/printdetail.php?id=100&t=o. September; Issue 3:1-6
  10. Zilfalil BA. and Rowani MR (1997), Online Birth Defects in Newborn at Hospital Universiti sains Malaysia, Kelantan. www.eimjm.com/Vol2-No1/Vol2-No1-B3.htm

Corresponding Author

Dr V.Sailaja

Army College of Dental Sciences, Secunderabad, Telangana

Email: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.