Title: Congenital Hypertrophic Pyloric Stenosis At A Tertiary Care Hospital: A Surgical Experience With 30 Infants

Authors: Dr Kawadu S. Jawade, Dr Ansari Mohammed Abdul Muqtadir, Dr Sarojini P. Jadhav, Dr Ashish B Raut

 DOI:  https://dx.doi.org/10.18535/jmscr/v5i9.99

Abstract

Background: Congenital hypertrophic pyloric stenosis (CHPS), first described in 1888 by Harald Hirschsprung, is one of the most common cause of gastric outlet obstruction in infants. The incidence is approximately 1–4 per 1000 live births although the incidence differs in various regions and communities. It is usually seen in first born male infants and is characterized by projectile or forceful vomiting due to high pressure generated by the hypertrophied gastric muscles. No exact etiological cause is known but genetic and environmental factors are thought to be involved in etiopathegenesis. The diagnosis is usually established by ultrasonography which shows increased pyloric muscle thickness, length and diameter. Ramstedt's pyloromyotomy introduced in 1912, still remains the operative procedure of choice for management of CHPS. There is little published data regarding this condition in our setting hence we conducted this study to describe the clinical presentation, Ultrasound findings, post-operative complications and outcome in infants having CHPS.

Aims and Objectives: (1)To study the incidence and demographic characteristics of patients with CHPS. (2) To study clinical presentation like projectile vomiting, palpable lump, jaundice and dyselectrolytemia in these patients. (3) To study USG findings like pyloric canal length and wall thickness. (4) To study operative outcomes in terms of cessation of vomiting. (5) To study complication like wound gaping, persistent vomiting and aspiration.

Materials and Methods: This was a prospective cohort study comprising of 30 patients with CHPS. For this study infants presenting with non-bilious vomiting and ultrasonography features of CHPS were screened and included depending upon inclusion and exclusion criteria. All patients underwent detailed history, clinical examination, investigation and surgical treatment and they were studied for clinical features, investigation, management and morbidity and mortality patterns. The data was studied using complex statistical software.

Results: The study comprised of 50 infants with congenital hypertrophic pyloric stenosis. Out of the 30 studied cases 20 were males and 10 were females with a M: F ratio of 1: 0.5. Predominantly first born children were affected (70%) while CHPS was found in 9 cases (30%) who were second by order of birth. The most common age of presentation was 4-8 weeks (56.7%) followed by within 4 weeks (33.3%) and 8-12 weeks (10%). The analysis of children with respect to their expected weight revealed that 23 (76.6%) infants had normal weight while 7 (23.4%) infants had weight less than expected foe their age. As expected in CHPS all infants had non bilious vomiting. There was no patient with associated congenital anomalies. In 2 (6.7%) infants there was a family history of CHPS in 1st or 2nd degree relatives. Jaundice and constipation was present in 5 (16.67 %) and 3 (10 %) patients respectively. On clinical examination abdominal distension, palpable epigastric lump, visible peristalsis and was present in 22 (73.3%), 14 (46.7%) and 8 (26.7%) infants respectively. All patients had some form of dehydration. Mild and moderate dehydration was present in 22 (73.3%) and 8 (26.7%) patients respectively. Hyponatremia and hypokalemia was present in 7 (23.3%) and 9 (30%) patients respectively. Ultrasound examination of the cases revealed that pyloric thickness was more than 4 mm in 24 (80%) infants and pyloric length was more than 16 mm in 29 (96.7%) cases. The sensitivity of ultrasound examination for diagnosis of CHPS was found to be 97%. Isolyte P alone (50%) or in combination with DNS (13.3%) or RL (36.7%) was used to correct electrolyte imbalance before surgery. In post-operative period a combination of Isolyte P and Ringers lactate was used in majority (53.3%) of the infants. Ramstedt's pyloromyotomy was done in all the infants with CHPS. In majority of the infants (79.3%) feeding was started within 72 hours after surgery. The most common postoperative complications seen in studied cases were respiratory tract infection (20%) followed by vomiting (16.7%) and wound gaping (10%). 14 (46.7%) patients remained under follow up while 16 (53.3%) were lost to follow up. Growth and development was found to be satisfactory in infants who were brought for regular follow up.

Conclusion: Congenital hypertrophic pyloric stenosis is most common cause of infantile gastric outlet obstruction with most common age of presentation between 4 to 8 weeks of life with a male preponderance. The condition can be diagnosed by ultrasonography and Ramstedt's pyloromyotomy is still procedure of choice for treatment of these patients.

Keywords: Congenital hypertrophic pyloric stenosis, Ultrasonography, Surgical management, Ramstedt's pyloromyotomy, outcome.

 

References

  1. Hirschsprung H. Falle von angeborener pyloric stenose. Jb Kinderheik. 1888;27:61.
  2. Ohshiro K, Puri P. Pathogenesis of infantile hypertrophic pyloric stenosis: recent progress. PediatrSurg Int. 1998 Apr;13(4):243-52.
  3. Feng Z, Nie Y, Zhang Y, et al. The Clinical Features of Infantile Hypertrophic Pyloric Stenosis in Chinese Han Population: Analysis from 1998 to 2010. Huang L-M, ed. PLoS ONE. 2014;9(2): e88925.
  4. Schechter R, Torfs CP, Bateson TF. The epidemiology of infantile hypertrophic pyloric stenosis. PaediatrPerinatEpidemiol. 1997 Oct;11(4):407-27.
  5. Chalya PL, Manyama M, Kayange NM, Mabula JB, Massenga A. Infantile hypertrophic pyloric stenosis at a tertiary care hospital in Tanzania: a surgical experience with 102 patients over a 5-year period. BMC Research Notes. 2015;8:690.
  6. Hussain M. Sonographic Diagnosis of Infantile Hypertrophic Pyloric stenosis- Use of Simultaneous Grey-scale &Colour Doppler Examination. International Jour-nal of Health Sciences. 2008;2(2):134-140.
  7. Maxwell-Armstrong CA, Cheng M, Reynolds JR, Holliday HW. Surgical management of infantile hypertrophic pyloric stenosis--can it be performed by general surgeons? Annals of The Royal College of Surgeons of England. 2000;82(5):341-343.
  8. Hulka F, Harrison MW, Campbell TJ, Campbell JR. Complications of pyloromyotomy for infantile hypertrophic pyloric stenosis. Am J Surg. 1997 May;173(5):450-2.
  9. Carter CO, Evans KA , Inheritance of congenital pyloric stenosis.J Med Genet. 1969 Sep; 6(3):233-54.
  10. C Paul , MJ Alam IHPS Faridpur Med Coll.J.2011;6 (1); 01-04 .
  11. Salman Al Ghawzwany , Infantile hypertrophic pyloric stenosis, Annals pediatric surgery 2012 vol 8 no 2 ; 39-42
  12. Amier A Ejrish IHPS, MEDICAL JOURNAL of BABYLON ; 2014; Vol 6 (3) 596-599.
  13. Kumar A et al , study of clinical, biochemical evaluation and outcomes in
    hypertrophic pyloric stenosis , Int J ContempPediatr. 2016 may ; 3 (2) 473-476
  14. Phillipo L Chalya, Mange Manyama, Neema M. Kayange , Infantile pyloric stenosis BMC Res Notes 2015 ; 8: 690
    Mitchell LE, Risch N. The genetics of infantile hypertrophic pyloric stenosis A reanalysis. Am J Dis Child. 1993 Nov;147(11):1203-11.
  15. Atwell JD, Levick P. Congenital hypertrophic pyloric stenosis and associated anomalies in the genitourinary tract. J Pediatr Surg. 1981 Dec;16(6):1029-35.
  16. Ranells JD, Carver JD, Kirby RS. Infantile hypertrophic pyloric stenosis: epidemic-ology, genetics, and clinical update. AdvPediatr. 2011;58(1):195-206.
  17. Nmadu PT. Alterations in serum electrolytes in congenital hypertrophic pyloric stenosis: a study in Nigerian children. Ann Trop Paediatr 1992; 12:169.
  18. Spicer RD. Infantile hypertrophic pyloric stenosis: a review. Br J Surg 1982;
    69:128.
  19. Tutay GJ, Capraro G, Spirko B, Garb J, Smithline H. Electrolyte profile ofpediatric patients with hypertrophic pyloric stenosis. PediatrEmerg Care. 2013 Apr;29(4):465-8.
  20. Said M, Shaul DB, Fujimoto M, Radner G, Sydorak RM, Applebaum H. Ultrasound Measurements in Hypertrophic Pyloric Stenosis: Don’t Let the Numbers Fool You. The Permanente Journal. 2012;16(3):25-27.
  21. Hussain M. Sonographic Diagnosis of Infantile Hypertrophic Pyloric stenosis- Use of Simultaneous Grey-scale &Colour Doppler Examination. International Journal of Health Sciences. 2008;2(2):134-140.
  22. Costa Dias S, Swinson S, Torrão H, et al. Hypertrophic pyloric stenosis: tips and tricks for ultrasound diagnosis. Insights into Imaging. 2012;3(3):247-250.
  23. Schwartz MZHypertrophic pyloric stenosis in paediatric surgery. 1111-17.
  24. HishamNazer Allan C. Terminantsog good outcome in pyloric stenosis. JPS
    2006:42(3):86-8.
  25. Carpenter RO, Schaffer RL, Maeso CE, Sasan F, Nuchtern JG, Jaksic T, Harber FJ, Wesson DE, Brandt ML. Postoperative ad lib feeding for hypertrophic pyloric J Pediatr Surg. 1999 Jun;34(6):959-61.
  26. Aspelund G, Langer JC. Current management of hypertrophic pyloric stenosis. SeminPediatr Surg. 2007 Feb; 16(1):27-33. Review. PubMed PMID: 17210480.
  27. Georgeson KE, Corbin TJ, Griffen JW, Breaux CW Jr. An analysis of feeding regimens after pyloromyotomy for hypertrophic pyloric stenosis. J Pediatr Surg. 1993 Nov;28(11):1478-80
  28. Solowiejczyk M, Holtzman M, Michowitz M. Congenital hypertrophic pyloric stenosis: a long-term follow-up of 41 cases. Am Surg. 1980 Oct;46(10):567-71.
  29. Gibbs MK, Van Herrden JA, Lynn HB. Congenital hypertrophic pyloric stenosis. Surgical experience. Mayo Clin Proc. 1975 Jun;50(6):312-6.

Corresponding Author

Dr Kawadu S. Jawade

Senior Resident, Department of General Surgery

Government Medical College & Hospital Nagpur