Title: Evaluation of Spinal Anaesthesia Using Low Dose Hyperbaric Bupivacaine for Day-Care Surgery

Authors: Sanjeev Kumar, Ravi Anand, Chandrakant Prasad, Saurav Shekhar, Kishore, K. H. Raghwendra, Arun Kumar

 DOI:  https://dx.doi.org/10.18535/jmscr/v5i7.120

Abstract

Aim: To compare recovery time and evaluate home readiness time after different dosage of hyperbaric bupivacaine.

Material and Methods: This study was performed in 3 different groups: group-I, group-II & group-III, each containing 50 patients. In study group-I, 6mg of hyperbaric bupivacaine, 8 mg in hyperbaric bupivacaine in group-II and in study group-III 10 mg hyperbaric bupivacaine was injected. The level of injection in all cases was at L2/3 vertebral interspace.

Results: In study group-I (6mg bupivacaine) failure rate was 6%. Peri­operative complain of discomfort and pain was also high (12.76%). Study group-Ill (10mg bupivacaine) did not show any advantage over group-II (8 mg bupivacaine). The 10mg dose prolonged the stay in PACU and delayed home-readiness by 44 min when compared with the 8mg dose of spinal bupivacaine.

Conclusion: Standardized spinal anaesthesia technique with 8mg dose of hyperbaric bupivacaine produced a good quality highly predictable spinal block with average duration of 57 minutes stay in PACU and average home readiness time was 4.15 hours. Furthermore, a small change in dose on upper and lower side (6mg or 10 mg) altered the reliability,   spread and recovery of the spinal anaesthesia.

Keywords: Hyperbaric Bupivacaine, Day-care surgery, Spinal anaesthesia.

References

1.      McGrath B, Chung F (2003) Postoperative recovery and discharge. Anesthesiology Clin North America 21:367-86

2.      Mulroy MF (2002b) Spinal Anaesthesia. In Mulroy MF(ed) Regional Anesthesia: An illustrated procedure guide, 3rd Edition. Lippincott Williams Wilkins, Philadelphia

3.      Dahl V, Gierloff C, Omland E, Raeder JC (1997) Spinal, epidural propofol aesthesia for out-patient for knee arthroscopy? Acta Anaesthesiology Scand 41:1341-5

4.      Heidvall M , Hein A, Davidson S, Jakobsson J (2000) Cost comparison between three different general anaesthetic techniques for elective arthroscopy of the knee. Acta Anaesthesiology Scand44 : 157-62

5.      Korttila K. Recovery from outpatient anaesthesia: factors affecting outcome Anesthesia 1995;50 (Suppl): 22–8.

6.      Apfelbaum JL, Walawander CA, Grasela TH,  et al. Eliminating intensive post operative care in same day-surgery patients using short acting anaesthetics. Anaesthesiology 2002; 97; 66-74.

7.      Aldrete JA, Kroulick D (1970); A post anaesthetic recovery score. Anesth Analg 49: 924-34.

8.      Aldrete JA (1995); The post-anaesthesia recovery score revisited. J Clin Anaesth 7:89-91

9.      ChungF, Chan VW, Ong D (1995). A post-anesthetic discharge scoring system for home readiness after ambulatory surgery. JClinABath7:500-6.

10.  Kuusniemi KS, Pihlajamiki KK, Kirveli OA, Korkeila JE (2001) Spinal anesthesia with hypobaric bupivacaine for knee arthroscopies: effect of posture on motor block. Reg Anath Pain Med 26:30-4

11.  Kuusniemi KS, Pihlajamiki KK, Pitkinen MT, Korkeila JE (1999) low-dose bupivacaine:   a    comparison     of hypobaric    and   near   isobaric solutions    for arthroscopic surgery of the knee. Anaesthesia 54:540-5

Corresponding Author

Dr Ravi Anand

Ex. Junior Resident, Dept. of Anaesthesiology & Critical Care Medicine

IGIMS, Patna, India

Email: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.