Title: Laparoscopy and Laparotomy as Savior for all cases of Abdominal Tuberculosis

Authors: Dr Shamim Khurrum Azmi (M.S), Dr Talat Fatma (M.D), Dr Jagdish Chandra (M.S)

 DOI:  https://dx.doi.org/10.18535/jmscr/v5i3.117

Abstract

Aim: To establish that laparoscopy is important modality of diagnosis and treatment in all cases of abdominal tuberculosis and can be life saving in certain grave and complicated cases.

Design: Prospective study done at department of surgery, Darbhanga Medical College and Hospital, Bihar from 2011- 2015. Cases were analyzed in terms of demography, clinical features, investigations, operative treatment, and outcome.

Materials and Methods:  80 patients with abdominal tuberculosis having age between 10yrs to 80 yrs age were included in the study. Among these there were 55 %( n=44) male patients and 45% (n=36) female patients with abdominal tuberculosis.

All the patients were subjected to detailed history and clinical examination followed by investigations and diagnostic laparoscopy.

Diagnostic laparoscopy was done to confirm the diagnosis. The following features seen by laparoscopy supports the diagnosis of abdominal tuberculosis:

  • Ascitic fluid in Peritoneal Cavity
  • Adhesions & Bands in Peritoneum
  • Tubercles
  • Stricture
  • Enlargement of mesenteric lymph node

Histopathology: biopsy of lymph nodes was sent for histopathological examination for final confirmation of diagnosis of tuberculosis.

Management: The cases were divided into two groups:

  1. Conservative: this group consisted of cases presenting with features of subacute obstruction .This group was managed by antitubercular drug treatment along with advise on diet and nutrition.
  2. Operative: this group consisted of patients presenting with features of acute obstruction .This group was subjected to laparoscopy and /or laparotomy and the following operative procedures were done:
  • Conservative ileo caecal resection
  • Ileotransverse anastomosis
  • Stricturoplasty
  • Resection and anastomosis
  • Simple closure of perforation
  • Right hemicolectomy
  • Laparotomy and biopsy

Follow up: After recovery patients were discharged with advise on use of drugs and report for checkup after 1 month, then 3 months, then 6 months and 1 year .In follow up subjective symptoms like abdominal distension, constipation, diarrhea, anorexia and weakness were regularly monitored. Objective improvement by accessing gain in body weight, hemoglobin percent and fall in E.S.R. was considered.

Results

  • 5% cases (n=10) improved on conservative management with antitubercular treatment along with hydration, correction of electrolyte imbalance, vitamin supplementation and nutritional support.
  • Remaining 87.5% cases (n=70) had to undergo surgical intervention in form of laparoscopy or laparotomy for definitive treatment.
  • Limited right hemicolectomy (ileo caecal resection) was the most common surgical procedure and done in 42.5% of cases (n=34).
  • Laparoscopic adhesiolysis was done in 25% of cases (n=20) presenting with adhesions and abdominal cocoon.
  • Stricturoplasty was done in 12.5% cases (n=10)
  • Resection and anastomosis was done in 7.5% cases (n=6) presenting with perforation and multiple adjacent strictures.

Conclusions: Laparoscopy is invaluable tool aiding in early diagnosis of abdominal and intestinal tuberculosis. In acute cases, surgical management is life saving. Limited right hemi-colectomy (ileo caecal resection) is the most commonly performed procedure with good results.

Keywords: Abdominal tuberculosis, laparoscopy, Intestinal stricture, Bowel perforation, Resection anastomosis, hemicolectomy.

Keywords:  laparoscopy, Laparotomy, Abdominal tuberculosis, Intestinal stricture, Bowel perforation, Resection anastomosis, right hemicolectomy.

References

  1. Kedar RP, Shah PP, Shirde RS, Malde HM. Sonographic findings in gastrointestinal and peritoneal tuberculosis. Clin Radiol. 1994;49:24-9.
  2. Kapoor VK. Koch’s or Crohn’s: the debate continues. Int J Clin Pract. 1997;51:532. 31. Kapoor VK. Abdominal tuberculosis. Postgrad M1998;74:459-67 .
  3. Khan R, Abid S, Jafri W, Abbas Z, Hameed K, Ahmad Z. Diagnostic dilemma of abdominal tuberculosis in non-HIV patients: An ongoing challenge for physicians. World J Gastroenterol. 2006;12:6371-5.
  4. Tandon RK, Bansal R, Kapur BML, Shriniwas. A study of malabsorption in intestinal tuberculosis: stagnant loop syndrome. Am J Clin Nutr. 1980;33:244-50.
  5. Charokar K, Garg N, Jain AK. Surgical management of abdominal tuberculosis: a retrospective study from Central India. Int Surg J 2016;3:23-31.
  6. Al-Hadeedi S,Walia HS, , al-Sayer HM. Abdominal tuberculosis. Can J Surg 1990; 33: 233–237.[PubMed]
  7. Mukerjee P, , Chopra I. Gynaecological tuberculosis in relation to abdominal tuberculosis. Proc Assoc Surg E Afr 1979; 2: 81–84.
  8. Rangabashyam N, Anand BS, Om Prakash R. Abdominal Tuberculosis. : Morris PJ, , Wood WC, editors. . Oxford Textbook of Surgery. 2nd edn. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2000. pp3 ,237–3, 249.
  9. Prakash A Ulcero-constrictive tuberculosis of the bowel. Int Surg 1978; 63: 23–29. [PubMed]
  10. Bankier AA, Fleischmann D, Wiesmayr MN, et al.. Update: abdominal tuberculosis – unusual findings on CT. Clin Radiol1995; 50: 223–228. [PubMed]
  11. Hossain J, , Al-Aska AK, , Al Mofleh I. Laparoscopy in tuberculous peritonitis. J R Soc Med  1992; 85: 89–91. [PMC free article] [PubMed].

Corresponding Author

Dr Shamim Khurrum Azmi

Email: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it., Mobile no: 9939980820