Title: MRI Evaluation of Internal Derangements of Knee Joint

Authors: Dr Josey Verghese, Dr Abin Thambi, Dr Sajitha K

 DOI:  https://dx.doi.org/10.18535/jmscr/v5i3.61

Abstract

Background- The knee is one of the most commonly involved joint in the external injuries. Internal derangement of knee (IDK) joint is a common cause of morbidity in the young, active individuals like athletes. The most widely used investigations are arthroscopy and Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI). Arthroscopy is considered as the gold standard for diagnosis of traumatic intra-articular lesions, however, it is an invasive procedure requiring hospitalization and anaesthesia and is associated with complications. Hence Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) has now been accepted as the best imaging modality for non-invasive evaluation of knee injuries. This study has been done to know the pattern of distribution of different types and incidence of injuries in traumatic knee joint by MR imaging and to compare with arthroscopy or arthrotomy findings.

Aim- a) To evaluate the pattern of distribution of ligamental and mensical injuries using Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)

 b) To find the proportion of cases where the MRI findings agree with arthroscopy or arthrotomy findings.

Materials and Methods- 69 Patients who undergo MR imaging of the knee on the advice of the referring doctor on his suspicion of internal derangement of the knee (IDK) in the department of Radiodiagnosis served as the subjects for this study from january 2013 to june 2014. Arthroscopy was carried out in OT by orthopedic surgeons in selected and available cases for diagnostic or therapeutic purposes.  Findings of MRI of the Knee are correlated with the arthroscopic findings in patients with internal derangements of knee.

Results- Qualitative data is described in terms of percentage from the 69 patients with suspected internal derangement of knee joint evaluated with MRI with assessment of 95% confidence interval and in selected cases proportion of agreement with the arthroscopy or arthrotomy is obtained.

Conclusion- MRI is a noninvasive, useful, noninvasive, radiation free & reliable diagnostic tool for evaluating knee injury and it should be done in suspected menisci and ligamentous injury, to be posted for arthroscopy, thus preventing unwanted diagnostic arthroscopy.

Keywords- MRI, Arthroscopy, IDK.

References

1.      Crema MD, Hunter DJ, Roemer FW, et al. The relationship between prevalent medial meniscal intrasubstance signal changes and incident medial meniscal tears in wo-men over a 1 year period assessed with 3.0

2.      Marc A. Camacho. The Double Posterior Cruciate Ligament Sign. Radiology 2004; 233:503– 504.

3.      Sonin AH, Fitzgerald SW, Friedman H: MR imaging of Posterior cruciate ligament; Normal, Abnormal and associated injury pattern. Radiographics 1995; 15: 551-561.

4.      Ryu KN, Kim IS, Kim EJ, et al. MR imaging of tears of discoid lateral menisci. AJR 1998; 171:963–967

5.      Grover JS, Bassett LW, Gross ML. Posterior cruciate ligament: MR imaging. Radiology 1990;174:527-530.

6.      Akisue T, Kurosaka M, Yoshiya S. Evaluation of healing of the injured posterior Cruciate Ligament: analysis of Instability and Magnetic Resonance Imaging. Arthroscopy 2001;17(3): 264–269.

7.      Miller TT, Gladden P, Staron RB, Henry JH, Feldman F: Posterolateral Stabilizers of the knee : anatomy and injuries assessed with MR imaging. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1997;169(6):1641-1647.

8.      Edwin H G Oei, Abida Z Ginai, M G Myriam Hunink. MRI for Traumatic Knee Injury: A Review. Semin Ultrasound CT MRI 2007;28:141-157.

9.      Mink JH: The Cruciate and Collateral ligaments, in Mink JH, Reicher MA, Crues JV III, (eds) : MRI of the Knee (2nd ed ). New York, Raven, 1993, pp 141- 188.

10.  Edwin H G Oei, Jeroen J Nikken, Antonia C M Verstijnen, Abida Z Ginai, M G Myriam Hunink.MR Imaging of the Menisci and Cruciate Ligaments: A Syst-ematic Review. Radiology2003;226:837–848.

11.  Samoto N, Kozuma M, Tokuhisa T, et al. Diagnosis of Discoid Lateral Meniscus of the Knee on MR imaging. Magn Reson Imaging 2002; 20(1):59–64.

12.  Michael G. Fox, MR Imaging of the Meniscus: Review, Current Trends, and Clinical Implications; radiolclin N Am 2007; 45:1033-1053.

13.  Singh JP, Garg L, Shrimali R, Setia V, Gupta V. MR Imaging of knee with arthroscopic correlation in twisting injuries. IJRI 2004;14: 33-40.

14.  Andrew H Sonin,Fitzerald SW,Friedman H,et al . PCL injury : MRI diagnosis and pattern of injury .Radiology 1994 167:121-12

15.  Thomas H. Berquist. Osseous and Myotendinous Injuries About the Knee. Radiolclin N Am2007;45: 955-968.

16.  Bernard Rosner, Fundamentals of Biostatistics. In: Bernard Rosner, editor. Fundamentals of Biostatistics. 5thed. Duxbury: Blackwell, 2000; 80-240.

17.  M. Venkataswamy Reddy, Statistics for Mental Health Care Research. In: Subba Rao, S Jingar editors, NIMHANS, INDIA 2002.

Corresponding Author

Dr Josey Verghese

Department of Radiodiagnosis, Government Medical College, Alppuzha, Kerala INDIA

Ph: 9447342889 Fax: 04772282368

Email: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.